Source: Jobs and Skills Australia
Slight uplift in recruitment activity in November
Linda
Source: Jobs and Skills Australia
Slight uplift in recruitment activity in November
Linda
Source: Workplace Gender Equality Agency
The Albanese Government is making it easier to travel across the Illawarra with a $10 million investment to plan Dapto’s new south-facing ramps, matching a $10 million investment from the Minns Labor Government.
The announcement follows an initial consultation period, conducted by the NSW Government, which received over 4,000 ideas and suggestions from the local community, all of which will inform next steps of the planning process.
The jointly-funded planning work will explore south-facing ramps onto the M1 Princes Motorway from Emerson Road, or from Fowlers or Kanahooka Roads which have existing north-facing ramps.
The project will deliver better connections between suburbs to the south such as Shellharbour and Kiama to suburbs like Dapto, Horsley and Brownsville.
The north facing on and off-ramps at Fowlers and Kanahooka roads currently limit Princes Motorway access to residents travelling to or from the north, forcing commuters travelling to or from south of Dapto to detour via the Princes Highway.
This leads to inflated travel times and distances for Illawarra motorists, particularly during morning, evening and weekend peak periods.
The population of the Illawarra-Shoalhaven is expected to grow by around 100,000 extra people by 2041. As the population continues to grow and travel habits change, the southern ramps will simplify travel options across the region.
Quotes attributable to Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government Minister Catherine King:
“With the population of the southern Illawarra booming, it’s vital that our investment in essential infrastructure keeps up.
“These southern ramps are a simple intervention, but one that will have an incredibly positive impact on the way people travel around this region.
“Work is already underway with the NSW Government completing initial consultation and planning. This additional investment will assist with detailed planning and progressing the project so we can get shovels in the ground sooner.”
Quotes attributable to NSW Minister for Roads John Graham:
“The community has spoken, they want these ramps. Now that $20 million has been committed from State and Federal Government, the detailed work can be done to ensure south-facing ramps go from being a good idea, to an every day reality.”
Quotes attributable to Member for Whitlam Stephen Jones:
“The madness of the north-only ramps means my constituents have to double back and forth between the highway and motorway to cover simple trips. Dapto’s north-only ramps have been a headache for locals for too long. This funding means we can finally get on with the job.
“As new developments spring up in West Dapto, it’s vital we get these ramps up and running so people aren’t caught in endless traffic jams. These south-facing ramps will give people a direct route and ease the bottlenecks on our roads.”
Quotes attributable to NSW Member for Shellharbour Anna Watson:
“2023 was the year of commitment, where our community made the case for this investment. 2024 was the year of consultation, where Transport for NSW heard directly from residents and motorists what they want to see from this project.
With this additional funding from the Federal Government, 2025 can be the year of detailed planning and development, as we get closer to starting work on this vital project.
Source: Australian Capital Territory Policing
Unregistered builder Mark (Najy) Rayes has been convicted and fined for taking more than $100,000 in payments from customers for services he did not provide.
Rayes, 47, was running an unregistered building and landscaping business when he committed the offences, between 2021 and 2023.
Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV) investigated Rayes after receiving customer complaints. He was convicted and fined $15,000 for offences under the Australian Consumer Law and $1,000 for breaches of the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995.
People are reminded that when hiring someone to do a renovation, extension, repairs or other building work worth more than $10,000, the contractor must be registered as a building practitioner and provide a written contract.
Registered builders are subject to professional standards, which means consumers are more likely to end up with a job they are happy with.
Hiring someone who isn’t registered risks hiring someone who isn’t skilled and consequently, consumers may end up with poor quality work, as well as limited recourse if the builder walks away.
Jobs worth more than $16,000 must also be covered by domestic building insurance, which protects consumers if the builder dies, disappears or is declared insolvent. For this work, builders must provide:
CAV Director Nicole Rich is urging people who are renovating or getting building work done to make sure they are covered.
“For more complex jobs, it’s essential to make sure you only hire practitioners with the right cover and qualifications,” she said.
“The law is there to protect you. Doing your due diligence can help ensure the build or reno is completed to the standard you want and expect.”
Find a registered builder on the Victorian Building Authority website.
For more about planning a renovation or build, including what to do if things go wrong, go to our Building and renovating information.
Source: FairTrading New South Wales
On 15 November 2024, Court Services Victoria (CSV) implemented requested changes to the wording of Magistrates’ Court and Children’s Court family violence intervention orders (FVIOs).
A coding error was made as part of those changes to a legacy system, leading to a line in the orders being omitted when printed.
CSV was notified about the error on 4 March 2025 and took immediate steps to rectify it.
All copies of family violence intervention orders printed from 6 March 2025 no longer omit the relevant line.
A full post-incident review is underway.
CSV acknowledges and apologises for the error. The safety of all affected family members was CSV’s priority as we remedied the issue.
Affected family members or respondents can call the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria’s Service Centre on 03 9087 6116 between 9am and 7pm Monday to Friday.
Contact: feedback@courts.vic.gov.au
Source: Jobs and Skills Australia
The Australian labour market continues to ease
Vasilisa
Source: South Australia County Fire Service
Issued for MURRAY BRIDGE NORTH near Murray Bridge in the Murraylands.
The CFS is currently responding to a haystack fire on Wilkin Road, Murray Bridge North. Machinery is being used to dismantle the haystack to help extinguish the fire. This process may generate smoke, which could be visible from Mannum Road. .
Message ID 0008406
Source: Allens Insights (legal sector)
Over the past few months, the Government has introduced a number of important reforms to the Australian telecommunications regulatory landscape. These reforms will have a significant impact on all carriers and many carriage service providers. Taken together with the current Telecommunications Consumer Protections (TCP) Code amendment process, they constitute a significant uplift in regulatory obligations applicable to the sector.
The legislative reforms comprise:
All carriers and a subset of CSPs will be subject to all three positive security obligations under the SoCI Act with resect to critical telecommunications assets (as opposed to being subject to parallel obligations which are currently enlivened pursuant to the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Conditions—Security Information) Declaration 2022 (Cth) and the Telecommunications (Carriage Service Provider—Security Information) Determination 2022 (Cth) (the Telco Security Information Instruments) with respect to asset registration and incident notification).
The subset of CSPs to be caught under these new rules (‘relevant carriage service provider asset’) are:
The definition of Critical Telecommunication Asset has been expanded to include:
‘(b) any other asset that is:
(i) owned or operated by a carrier or a carriage service provider; and
(ii) used in connection with the supply of a carriage service’ (emphasis added)
Consistent with reforms to the SoCI Act implemented in December 2024, the effect of this amendment is to ensure that assets owned and operated by carriers/CSPs which are used in connection with the supply of a service (rather than used directly in the supply a service) are captured under the SoCI Act. This would include, for example, CRM systems and corporate IT networks that were not previously clearly captured.
| CARRIER ASSETS | ‘RELEVANT CSP’ ASSETS | OTHER CSP ASSETS | |
| Risk Management Program obligations | ✓ |
✓ |
|
| Obligation to protect asset3 |
✓ |
✓ |
|
| Notification of changes4 |
✓ |
||
| Asset Registration obligation |
✓ |
✓ |
|
| Mandatory Cyber Incident Reporting |
✓ |
✓ |
|
| Government assistance, directions and information-gathering powers |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
The TSRMP Rules largely mirror the existing Security of Critical Infrastructure (Critical infrastructure risk management program) Rules (LIN 23/006) 2023 (Cth) with additions to reflect telecommunications-specific risks, including risks relating to the compromise, theft or manipulation of communications.
Some key points in the draft TSRMP Rules stand out in particular:
The Amended Application Rules will transfer the existing registration obligations for carriers and CSPs, which are currently applicable by virtue of the Telco Security Information Instruments, to the SoCI Act. As per the above table, the obligation to provide ownership, operation, interest and control information to the Register of Critical Infrastructure Assets will apply to carriers and Relevant CSPs.
We understand that the existing equivalent obligations made under the Telco Security Information Instruments will continue to be in effect until 7 July 2025.
The Amended Application Rules will also activate the Mandatory Cyber Incident Reporting obligations for carriers and Relevant CSPs under the SoCI Act.
Again, the existing equivalent obligations made under the Telco Security Information Instruments will remain in effect until 7 July 2025.5
The reforms to the SoCI Act also transfer elements of the TSSR currently contained in Part 14 of the Telco Act into a new Part 2D of the SoCI Act.
Other TSSR components that would be repealed from the existing Telco Act, including other direction-making powers of the Minister for Home Affairs, the Secretary of Home Affairs’ information gathering powers and requirements in relation to security capability plans are not proposed to be replicated into the SoCI Act.
However, the existing SoCI Act’s direction-making, information-gathering powers are broadly equivalent to these provisions.
The Enhancing Consumer Safeguards Bill has been introduced by the Government to improve compliance and enforcement of telecommunications consumer protection rules for the benefit of consumers.6
These proposed reforms coincide with a review by the ACMA of the TCP Code and a draft revised version that has been the subject of public consultation (and much debate).
Currently, there is no licensing or other registration framework that applies to CSPs under the Telco Act (unlike carriers, that must register a carrier licence with the ACMA).
The Enhancing Consumer Safeguards Bill proposes to establish a CSP registration scheme prohibiting:
The CSP registration scheme is proposed to apply to ‘eligible carriage service providers’, being CSPs that enter into the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman (TIO) scheme and supply:
ACMA will also have the power to:
The ACMA does not currently have the power to directly enforce industry codes rather, it must first direct a provider to comply with the code or issue a formal warning.8 The ACMA can currently only take stronger enforcement action if the provider continues to not comply with its directions or warnings.
The Enhancing Consumer Safeguards Bill proposes to make compliance with an industry code mandatory and to make breaches of the obligation to comply with registered industry code a civil penalty provision that is directly enforceable by the ACMA at first instance.
Currently, maximum civil penalties differ greatly across the Telco Act and the current maximum civil penalty for non-compliance with a direction by the ACMA to comply with a registered industry code is $250,000.9
The Enhancing Consumer Safeguards Bill proposes to increase maximum penalties that can be ordered by the court for individual contraventions to the greater of:
Currently the Telco Act only permits the Minister for Communications to increase infringement notice penalties for breaches of either the general carrier licence conditions or CSP rules.
The proposed amendments to the Telco Act will allow the Minister for Communications to increase infringement notice penalty amounts for any breach where the ACMA can already issue an infringement notice.
Organisations in the telecommunications sector should consider the steps required to ensure compliance with the latest reforms. This might include:
Source:
We develop public advice and guidance to help super funds understand and meet their reporting and legislative obligations.
Our Advice under development – super issues page provides details of advice and guidance products under development for key superannuation issues. It outlines the specifics, purpose, expected completion dates, and contact points for each piece of guidance currently under consideration.
If you’re waiting for updates on a draft law practice statement, an addendum to a ruling, or other guidance, check this page for updates.
We encourage you to regularly review this resource to help you stay informed.
Looking for the latest news for Super funds? You can stay up to date by visiting our Super funds newsroom and subscribingExternal Link to our monthly Super funds newsletter and CRT alerts.
Source:
Open forums are interactive webinars with guest speakers from the ATO and the Tax Practitioners Board.
These webinars give you and your staff an opportunity to:
Your attendance may contribute towards your continuing professional educationExternal Link (CPE) with the Tax Practitioners Board.
You can register for one of our open forums using the ‘Register for this session’ link in the following table.
|
Open forum sessions |
Session topics |
|---|---|
|
An update from the ATO Wednesday 9 April 2025 2:00 pm to 3:30 pm AEST |
Helping small businesses
Cyber security
Improving lodgment performance, part 2 of 3 – why a lodgment deferral request may not be granted
|
|
An update from the ATO Thursday 8 May 2025 11.30 am to 1:00 pm AEST |
eInvoicing
Improving lodgment performance, part 3 of 3 – are you requesting deferrals to support your practice?
NFP (not-for-profit) self-review return
|
Source:
Commencing for the 2023–24 income year, more than 100,000 non-charitable not-for-profits (NFPs) with an active Australian business number (ABN) are now required to lodge an annual self-review return to notify of their eligibility to self-assess as income tax exempt.
The new reporting requirement was introduced in the 2021–22 Federal Budget to enhance transparency and integrity in the tax, super and registry system by ensuring only eligible non-charitable NFPs access that income tax exemption. The law hasn’t changed but the reporting of eligibility has.
The ATO has extended the due date for the 2023–24 income year self-review return until 31 March 2025, to help NFPs lodge their first return. Future self-review returns will be due by 31 October annually.
Charitable NFPs registered with the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) are not required to lodge the self-review return.
ATO Assistant Commissioner Jennifer Moltisanti encouraged NFPs to act now, review their affairs and lodge their first self-review return.
‘With the 31 March deadline fast approaching, it is important that all NFPs who are required to lodge the 2023–24 income year self-review return do so in time. NFPs must meet this requirement to continue self-assessing as income tax exempt,’ Ms Moltisanti advised.
‘Thousands of NFPs have already lodged their first return. It doesn’t take much time to complete the return and lodge’.
‘We know the NFP population is made up of diverse groups that include community service organisations and sporting clubs right across Australia.’
‘It is important all NFPs are aware of their obligations and don’t delay lodging their first return. We will support NFPs that are genuinely trying to do the right thing, however, we will review those who intentionally ignore their obligations.’
‘If you don’t understand the new reporting requirements, we encourage you to act early and ask for help – from the ATO or your registered tax professional,’ Ms Moltisanti said.
Some NFPs, when completing their self-assessment, may realise that they instead need to register with the ACNC as a charitable NFP to access the income tax exemption. Others may come to the conclusion that they have incorrectly assumed that they were entitled to a tax exemption.
‘If you’ve mistakenly assessed as income tax exempt in the past it is important you don’t worry. You can contact our dedicated team and we can help you work it out.’
‘Similarly, if you realise that your organisation should instead be registered with the ACNC as a charitable NFP, you can still lodge the NFP self-review return and we will help you with the next steps,’ Ms Moltisanti said.
The ATO has developed the NFP self-review return flowchart to provide a step-by-step guide on how to access and lodge the return online through Online services for business. NFPs can also phone the ATO’s self-help phone service on 13 72 26 to lodge by phone or use their registered tax agent.
The return only asks for information that NFPs should already know:
NFPs can also phone the ATO’s dedicated NFP Advice Service on 1300 130 248 if they require further assistance.
‘We are committed to supporting NFPs and helping them to meet their obligations.’
The ATO continues to ensure NFPs have the support and information they need to lodge. For more information visit ato.gov.au/NFPtaxexempt.