Supplementary annual GST return

Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

About the Supplementary annual GST return

We’re working to better tailor our engagement with taxpayers under our Top 100 and Top 1,000 justified trust programs for GST. To facilitate this, we’re introducing the Supplementary annual GST return for large businesses that have received a GST assurance rating through a GST assurance review.

The information provided in your annual return will enable more tailored and less resource investment for justified trust reviews for many taxpayers. The return is straightforward to complete and targeted at understanding key governance and GST changes during the year. Taxpayers who have achieved high levels of assurance are expected to benefit most as they’ve already adopted better practice governance and systems practices.

We’re introducing the supplementary return for the 2024–25 financial year, for taxpayers who received a GST assurance report on or before 30 June 2024 with a GST assurance rating.

We’ll notify you directly if you’re required to lodge the return.

The supplementary return covers:

  • how you’ve actioned recommendations, areas of low assurance or red flags outlined by us in your most recent GST assurance review (including subsequent interactions with us)
  • whether you’ve maintained or increased your level of GST governance and if you’ve had any material business or systems changes that impact your GST control framework since your last GST assurance review
  • the reconciliation between your audited financial statements and your annualised business activity statements
  • whether you’ve taken any material uncertain GST positions in the period
  • whether you’ve identified any material GST errors in the period and how these have been rectified, and whether you claimed any material amounts of credits in the period that were referable to earlier periods.

You should keep objective evidence to support your responses in the return.

Who is required to lodge a supplementary return

Public and multinational businesses that have received a GST assurance rating through a Top 100 or Top 1,000 assurance review are required to lodge a Supplementary annual GST return.

You’ll be required to lodge a supplementary return for the 2024–25 financial year if you received one of the following on or before 30 June 2024:

  • Top 100 GST assurance report
  • Top 1,000 combined assurance review report with a GST assurance rating
  • Top 1,000 GST streamlined assurance review.

If you haven’t yet received a GST assurance rating, you’re not required to lodge a supplementary return.

You’ll need to complete a supplementary return starting from the financial year following the financial year you received your GST assurance report.

For example, if you received your first GST assurance rating in a Top 1,000 combined assurance review report issued after 30 June 2024, but before 30 June 2025, you’ll need to complete a Supplementary annual GST return for the 2025–26 financial year onwards.

Examples of lodging a supplementary return

Example 1: GST assurance rating received in September 2024

Titmus Forestry received an initial Top 100 GST assurance report in September 2024, with its first GST assurance rating. Titmus Forestry is an early December balancer.

As Titmus Forestry received the report prior to 30 June 2025, it needs to complete a Supplementary annual GST return for the 2025–26 financial year onwards (that is, for the period 1 January to 31 December 2025).

End of example

If an entity that has been previously assured is no longer a GST reporting entity (that is, no longer lodges business activity statements) but instead is part of a new GST reporting group, then the new GST reporting group must lodge a supplementary annual GST return. This is if the previously assured GST reporting entity (or entities) contributes 50% or more of the GST throughput reported by the new GST reporting group.

Example 2: changes in GST reporting entity

Attia Media Co. received a GST assurance rating in its combined assurance review report in August 2022. In April 2024, Attia Media Co. ceased being a GST reporting entity as it was acquired by another entity and is now a member of a new GST group. Attia Media Co. contributes 75% of the GST throughput reported by the new GST group, Saniel Communications.

Despite Saniel Communications not having had an initial GST assurance review itself, the ATO advises Saniel Communications that it will need to lodge a Supplementary annual GST return for the 2024–25 financial year onwards. This is because Attia Media Co. contributes over 50% of the GST throughput reported by Saniel Communications.

End of example

When the supplementary return is due

Taxpayers who received a GST assurance review report on or before 30 June 2024 will need to lodge a return annually from the 2024–25 financial year, according to the due dates shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Due dates for the 2024–25 financial years

Financial year end

Due date

December 2024

21 August 2025

January, February, March 2025

21 November 2025

April, May, June 2025

21 February 2026

July, August, September 2025

21 May 2026

October, November 2025

21 August 2026

The Supplementary annual GST return is a further return that we require certain taxpayers to lodge under Division 31 of the GST Act. If you need to lodge the supplementary return, you’ll receive a notice under section 31-20 of the GST Act to lodge the return by the specified due date.

Division 31 enables us to require taxpayers to lodge a fuller or further GST return for a tax period or a specified period. It enables us to require information to be provided relating to the tax period to which the return relates, or one or more preceding tax periods, or to both.

The Supplementary annual GST return has a due date that aligns with an existing return due at least 7 months after the end of the financial year.

For instance, for June balancers, the 2024–25 Supplementary annual GST return will be an additional return for the January 2026 period, due by 21 February 2026. You will need to provide information about the period 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2025.

The supplementary return does not replace any other GST return required. This return has no effect on the due dates for any other returns. It does not affect the 4-year entitlement period to input tax credits under Division 93 of the GST Act, in any way.

Penalties can apply if you fail to lodge the supplementary return on time.

How we use the information you provide

The information provided in the supplementary return will help us:

  • assess the extent to which we have confidence that GST has been correctly reported
  • determine the level of ongoing investment in GST governance.

Generally, our future engagement with you will depend on a number of factors, including:

  • the level of assurance obtained in our most recent GST assurance review
  • our monitoring and analytics during the periods between assurance reviews
  • the information provided in your return.

The return collects information relevant to your continued investment in GST governance and correct reporting. It includes the work you’ve undertaken to address previous ATO recommendations or areas of low assurance or red flags, and whether you have completed the GST analytical tool or similar reconciliation for the period.

We’ll also use the information provided to identify and monitor GST risks. We’ll differentiate our approach where we identify specific issues that require further engagement with you.

Taxpayers in the Top 100 program

We complete an initial Top 100 GST assurance review for each Top 100 taxpayer and continue annual reviews until overall high or medium assurance is attained.

Once a taxpayer has attained an overall medium or high level of assurance in a Top 100 GST assurance review, they can expect tailored engagement. We review on a periodic basis at least once every 4 years, taking a monitoring stance during the intervening 3-year period. We may conduct targeted assurance activities during this time.

We use the information you provide in the Supplementary annual GST return for Top 100 taxpayers to:

  • monitor your GST disclosures and outcomes in the intervening 3 years
  • inform the scope and intensity of our GST assurance reviews, including refresh reviews.

The return also provides information for the refresh review period that is relevant to each of the 4 focus areas under justified trust. We’ll use this information, in conjunction with our earlier assurance review and what has since been disclosed in real time, to target our focus on the key areas where we need to refresh our assurance base.

Our Top 100 Pre-lodgment disclosure framework sets out our existing expectations for real-time disclosures by Top 100 taxpayers. If you disclose something in real time that needs to be included in your Supplementary annual GST return, you can provide a brief explanation in the return and refer to the date of the prior disclosure for further context.

Example 3: taxpayer in the Top 100 program

Layoun Minerals is a Top 100 taxpayer that has had a GST assurance review and receives an overall high assurance rating and a Stage 2 governance rating. There were no areas of low assurance or red flags in the assurance report.

Our assurance report recommends that Layoun Minerals:

  • create a procedure document in relation to issuing recipient created tax invoices
  • implement a documented procedure to undertake the GST analytical tool (GAT) or similar reconciliation on an annual basis to understand variances between their financial statements and GST reporting
  • evidence independent testing of their GST control framework.

Layoun Minerals actively implements our recommendations. It also makes real-time disclosures when applicable in accordance with the Top 100 Pre-lodgment disclosure framework.

When completing the Supplementary annual GST return for the 2024–25 financial year, Layoun Minerals provides the following responses:

  • Section B – there were no outstanding actions in relation to recommendations or areas of low assurance or red flags from its most recent GST assurance review (including subsequent ATO interactions) as it has
    • implemented a procedure document for recipient created tax invoices
    • a documented process to undertake the GAT annually
    • conducted the first phase of internal controls testing in line with its testing plan, with an independent tester conducting the testing of some specific controls and providing a report outlining the findings.
  • Section C – during the period the return covers, it considers it meets the criteria to maintain the GST governance rating given in the most recent GST assurance review, based on the criteria set out in our GST governance, data testing and transaction testing guide. There have not been any material business changes or material systems changes that impact its GST control framework since the earlier assurance review.
  • Section D – it had completed the GAT for the period the return covers with the following rates provided
    • effective GST rate on sales of 10.03%
    • effective GST rate on expenses of 9.72%
    • net effective GST rate of 9.84%.

It considers that the remaining variance could only be resolved through a transactional-level analysis.

  • Section E – it did not take any material uncertain GST positions in the period the return covers.
  • Section F – during the period the return covers, it has not identified any material GST reporting errors or claimed material input tax credit amounts referable to earlier periods.

Layoun Minerals retains objective evidence to support its responses.

Layoun Minerals has a refresh GST assurance review of the 2024–25 financial year.

We take a tailored approach in determining the scope and intensity of the refresh review. We leverage existing information, evidence and knowledge from our earlier assurance review, in combination with the information provided in Layoun Minerals’ Supplementary annual GST return for the refresh period and any real-time disclosures.

The information indicates that Layoun Minerals has maintained a high level of GST compliance and governance. This enables us to reduce the scope and intensity of the refresh review.

Layoun Minerals has already completed the GAT and can readily provide the objective evidence used to support its calculations.

When considering all the relevant information, including the Supplementary annual GST return, we determine that there will be no requirement to conduct comprehensive data testing in the refresh review.

End of example

Taxpayers in the Top 1,000 program

Under our differentiated approach to combined assurance reviews, we’ll assess the responses to the returns to determine the level of intensity for your next GST assurance review. This may result in a less intensive GST assurance review, or we may decide a GST assurance review is not required, where:

  • you have obtained an overall medium or high assurance rating for GST and a Stage 2 or Stage 3 GST governance rating in your most recent assurance review, with no unresolved ATO or client next actions
  • the information you provide in the return enables us to maintain confidence that your investment in GST governance is maintained and that GST is correctly reported.

Taxpayers who obtained an overall low GST assurance rating or a Stage 1 GST governance rating will continue to be assured as part of their combined assurance review, however our review will be tailored based on the assurance already attained and the responses provided in the return.

For taxpayers with significant systems changes (for example, implementing a new IT system) since their most recent GST assurance review, generally we would need to consider the impacts of these on GST governance through our assurance programs. There may also be taxpayers where specific engagement is required due to GST risks in their business.

We may take a tailored approach to reviewing objective evidence to support responses in the return as part of a combined assurance review. This approach will vary based on the assurance previously attained and the responses in the return. For example, this may include reviewing evidence where a taxpayer indicates it has:

  • increased a rating to Stage 3 for governance
  • addressed recommendations in relation to a specific risk identified in the earlier assurance review
  • GAT workpapers.

Example 4: taxpayer in the Top 1,000 program

Timlin Manufacturing is a Top 1,000 taxpayer that has had a combined assurance review and received an overall high GST assurance rating and a stage 2 GST governance rating. There were no areas of low assurance or red flags in the assurance report.

Our assurance report recommended that the taxpayer:

  • evidence independent testing of their GST control framework
  • document a process to periodically review whether it exceeds the financial acquisitions threshold
  • implement a documented procedure to undertake the GST analytical tool or similar reconciliation on an annual basis to understand variances between their financial statements and GST reporting.

Timlin Manufacturing has actively implemented our recommendations from its assurance review.

When completing the Supplementary annual GST return for the 2024–25 financial year, Timlin Manufacturing’s responses were:

  • Section B – there are no outstanding actions in relation to recommendations or areas of low assurance or red flags relating to its most recent GST assurance review (including subsequent ATO interactions).
    • Timlin Manufacturing has implemented documented procedures to undertake the GST Analytical Tool (GAT) on an annual basis and has introduced documented processes to regularly review whether the financial acquisitions threshold has been exceeded.
    • Timlin Manufacturing has commenced some controls testing in line with its testing plan, however it will not complete the testing until 2025–26 because the testing occurs over a 3 to 5-year rolling audit period.
  • Section C – it considers it meets the criteria to maintain the GST governance rating obtained in the most recent GST assurance review. That is, it considers it has maintained a Stage 2 rating, based on the criteria set out in our GST governance, data testing and transaction testing guide.
  • Section D – it has completed the GAT and considers that all variances can be explained. The following rates were provided:
    • effective GST rate on sales of 9.96%
    • effective GST rate on expenses of 9.94%
    • net effective GST rate of 9.82%.

It considers that the remaining variance can reasonably be explained by timing differences.

  • Section E – it has not taken any material uncertain GST positions in the period the return covers.
  • Section F – it has not identified any material GST reporting errors or claimed material input tax credit amounts referable to earlier periods.

Timlin Manufacturing retains objective evidence to support the responses.

Based on the information provided in the return, we were able to assess Timlin Manufacturing’s GST compliance position and determine that it has actioned our recommendations and the responses provided us with confidence that the level of investment in GST compliance has been maintained.

If Timlin Manufacturing is selected for a combined assurance review in the 2024–25 financial year, we would expect to either:

  • not undertake a GST assurance review as part of the combined assurance review
  • take a tailored approach to reviewing objective evidence to support responses in the return.

End of example

Completing and lodging the supplementary return

To get a copy of the return, go to Supplementary annual GST return 2025. You can also read Instructions to complete the Supplementary annual GST return 2025.

Email the completed Supplementary annual GST return to SAGR@ato.gov.au.

If additional lodgment methods are available, we’ll let you know when we issue your notice to lodge.

You should have objective evidence to support your responses in the return. However, you do not need to provide any documentation when lodging your return. We may ask you for supporting evidence later.

More information

If you have any questions about the Supplementary annual GST return, you can email us at SAGR@ato.gov.au.

Arrest made after firearms search in Risdon Park South

Source: New South Wales – News

A man has been arrested and woman reported after police located illicit drugs and a firearm.

Around 11am on Wednesday 7 May, Port Pirie police attended a house in Risdon Park South and conducted a search.

During this search, patrols located methamphetamine, GHB, drug paraphernalia, ammunition and a 3D printed firearm.

A 42-year-old man from Risdon Park South was arrested and charged with possess a firearm without a licence and possess an unregistered firearm and his bail was refused.

A 26-year-old woman from Risdon Park South was reported for possess ammunition without a licence, possess controlled drug and possess equipment to use with a controlled drug.

She will be summonsed to appear in court at a later date.

CO2500018788

Southern road police targeting red lights and mobile phones

Source: New South Wales Community and Justice

Southern road police targeting red lights and mobile phones

Thursday, 8 May 2025 – 11:55 am.

Southern Road Policing Services conducted a targeted traffic operation in central Hobart yesterday, focusing on road safety offences, including drivers disobeying red lights and using mobile phones while driving.
Inspector Kathy Bennett said police were disappointed at the number of drivers who appeared to push the limits of red and orange traffic lights, failing to recognise the importance of stopping safely.
“We remind all motorists that they have a brake pedal as well as an accelerator, and the decision to rush through a changing light could have serious consequences,” she said.
Throughout the operation, officers detected and issued infringements for multiple offences:
• 22 people were caught using mobile phones
• 14 people were caught disobeying red lights
• One driver was caught not wearing a seatbelt
Inspector Bennett said these sorts of operations will continue to target dangerous driving behaviours.
“We will continue conducting targeted operations to ensure motorists adhere to the law and prioritise safety,” she said.
“If you’re on the roads, please follow the road rules, and avoid distractions while behind the wheel.”

Call for information – Aggravated assault – Ludmilla

Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

The Northern Territory Police Force is calling for information in relation to a rock throwing incident in Ludmilla overnight.

Around 10:20pm, the Joint Emergency Services Communication Centre received a report that a brick had been thrown through a rear side window of a vehicle traveling outbound on Bagot Road near the entrance to Bagot Community.

The vehicle was carrying 4 occupants, with a woman suffering a serious injury to her eye.

Police and St John Ambulance attended, and the woman was conveyed to Royal Darwin Hospital for treatment.

The alleged offender is described as a male youth aged around 14-years-old. He allegedly fled with two other youths into Bagot Community.

Patrols were conducted in the area and investigations into the identity of the offender remain ongoing.

Detectives are urging anyone with information, particularly if you have dash-cam footage along Bagot Road yesterday evening , to contact police on 131 444, quoting reference number NTP2500047387. Anonymous reports can be made through Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or via https://crimestoppersnt.com.au.

Doorstop, Canberra

Source: Australian Attorney General’s Agencies

Journalist: Thank you for joining us. Congratulations on Labor’s win. Firstly, it’s removed two leaders, Peter Dutton and Adam Bandt, at the last count. How are you feeling about the landslide?

Trade Minister, Don Farrell: Well, very positive. I think it’s a very positive endorsement of Prime Minister Albanese and the flawless campaign that he ran. He had a vision for Australia. I don’t think any of the other candidates from the other parties had that vision. I think the Australian people have now overwhelmingly endorsed Anthony Albanese’s vision for the future of Australia.

Journalist: And the Labor caucus will meet here tomorrow. Will you remain as Trade Minister?

Minister Farrell: Look, that’s entirely in the hands of the Prime Minister. I’ll be putting myself forward this afternoon and tomorrow for the ministerial positions. What job I get in that new ministry will be entirely in the hands of the Prime Minister. Obviously, I really like the job as Trade Minister and I’d like to continue. But I’m happy to serve Prime Minister Albanese in any way he thinks I should.

Journalist: I believe you are safe. That has been confirmed as the leadership team will stay the same. Where would your first trip be?

Minister Farrell: Well, that’ll be up to the Prime Minister. I know he has some plans to visit some countries and I’d be very happy to go with him if he wanted me to do that. On election night, I got messages from both the Europeans and the Indians indicating that they’re very keen to continue with the discussions to get free trade agreements. Obviously, we’ve got the UAE free trade agreement coming up in a few weeks that will allow all Australian products to go into the UAE tariff-free. So, we’re in the business of supporting free and fair trade and arguing wherever we can that the best interests of Australia and the rest of the world is served by free and fair trade.

Journalist: How are we going securing a tariff carve out with the Trump administration?

Minister Farrell: Look, we’re continuing to prosecute that argument. Obviously, we’ve been in caretaker mode for the last five weeks, but our Ambassador, of course, Kevin Rudd, is doing a really good job in the United States prosecuting the argument on our behalf and will continue to do that.

Journalist: And a difficult time between the United States and China, are we making any headway? How do you plan to tackle that relationship going forward?

Minister Farrell: Our argument is very simple. The way to prosperity is through free trade. Tariffs are the wrong way to go and I think we’ll quickly see in the United States that inflation goes up, unemployment goes up and the share market goes down. None of those are good for working people. We want to prosecute the argument with the United States with China that tariffs are not the way to go and both countries should remove their tariffs. Thank you.

Journalist: Thank you very much.

Interview with ABC News Breakfast

Source: Australian Attorney General’s Agencies

James Glenday, Host: On federal politics, Don Farrell joins us now from Parliament House. Don, good morning and welcome back to News Breakfast.

Trade Minister, Don Farrell: Good morning, James.

Glenday: On the final sitting day, could you have imagined returning to Canberra knowing that you’d knocked off the Liberal Party’s leader, Peter Dutton, and the leader of The Greens, Adam Bandt as well?

Minister Farrell: Well, the truth is, James, I don’t think anybody could have predicted that. I was confident, based on the work that we’d done over the previous three years, especially in my space, of trade, that we would be returned and returned with a majority. But even I couldn’t believe the results as they came in on Saturday night. I think the Greens have suffered because so many times in the last Parliament they blocked sensible policies of the Albanese Government. They voted with the Coalition in the Senate to block, for instance, legislation on housing, sensible housing policy, and I think they’ve paid the political price for that.

Glenday: This outcome must be deeply satisfying for you. Personally, I just wonder, have you ever felt so satisfied after an election win? Where does this rank? Is it the sweetest victory, almost a fairytale for Labor?

Minister Farrell: Look, it doesn’t, doesn’t get any better than this, James. When you’ve been involved in politics as long as I have, this has to be the sweetest victory of all.

Glenday: There you go. Now there’s a trade war happening. I’m not sure where you’re going to end up, but if you are reinstalled as Trade Minister, you’ll have a lot on your plate. Do you know where you’ll head?

Minister Farrell: First of all, look, we’ve got a number of objectives that we will need to prosecute and prosecute very quickly. On election night I got messages from my European colleagues, they’re very keen to re-engage and have another crack at an EU free trade agreement. The EU has 450 million people, and a $17 trillion economy. They’ll be very important if we can get a breakthrough there. The Indians also contacted me. We were very close to a new free trade agreement with them and I think we can move very quickly now to finalise that agreement. And of course, in the next few weeks, our new free trade agreement with the United Arab Emirates, which sends all of our products into the UAE tariff free, will come into force and that will be important. And of course we, we want to continue discussions with the United States. We believe in free and fair trade and that’s the argument we’ll be prosecuting with them.

Glenday: I think it’ll be closely watched. Do you expect to head to either China or to the States first?

Minister Farrell: Look, we’ll worry about that after we know who the new Trade Minister is next week.

Glenday: That’s fair.

Minister Farrell: But we will move very quickly to ensure that Australia’s interests are protected here. China, of course, is our largest trading partner. We’re concerned about the tariff war between China and the United States. We believe in free and fair trade and we think that those tariffs should be removed on China.

Glenday: Okay. You are a factional leader of the Labor right. You were once unkindly referred to as a faceless man. Of course you do have a face. And here you are speaking to us. What are you asking the Prime Minister for though? You’ve got a lot of influence as these Ministerial portfolios are carved up.

Minister Farrell: A face that a mother could love. And they do call me other things too, by the way. That’s not the only thing they call me. Look, I’m not going to give the Prime Minister any advice on what he should do. He’s won a fabulous victory here. He ran a flawless campaign. His strategy throughout the whole of the last term was about getting reelected and continuing the policies that we took to the election. I’m very happy to leave it all to him and to accept whatever he might wish me to do in the new government.

Glenday: Ok, just before I let you go, I want to get you on an international issue that’s been developing. Has the Albanese government made any contact with India or Pakistan regarding these cross border strikes we’re seeing?

Minister Farrell: Look, that’s an issue of course, that is in the hands of our very competent and successful Foreign Minister, Penny Wong. But of course we don’t want to see any conflict in our region. We’d like to see an end to the conflict in the Middle East, the conflict in Ukraine, Russia, and we certainly don’t want to see any conflict in our own region.

Glenday: And Don, just one last one. We saw smoke this morning from the Vatican. You went to the Pope’s funeral. I’m not sure what that was like, but do you have a personal preference of who the next Pope should be or the direction of the Catholic Church? I’m guessing this is outside the bounds of your factional influence.

Minister Farrell: Well, as a matter of fact, James, I do have a personal favourite in the Conclave at the moment. And that is the Australian – Ukrainian Cardinal, Cardinal Bychok. I was lucky enough to meet with him twice while I was in Rome. He’s a very, very fine man. A very holy man. I’d like to see him as the next pope. My wife, on the other hand, who’s Filipino, she would like to see Cardinal Tagle as the next pope. And we also had the opportunity of meeting him at the Vatican. So, there’s a couple of candidates for you, James.

Glenday: There you go. Well, we’ll have to wait and see if you’ve backed a winner there, Don Farrell, the Trade Minister. Perhaps the continuing Trade Minister. We’ll wait and see for that as well. Thank you so much for joining News Breakfast this morning.

Minister Farrell: Thanks, James.

New tool to fast-track ovarian cancer diagnosis

Source:

08 May 2025

A woman’s chances of surviving ovarian cancer at least five years after diagnosis come down to the toss of a coin: just 49% will reach that milestone, making it one of the most lethal reproductive cancers worldwide.

One of the reasons for the high mortality rate is late-stage diagnosis and delayed treatment due to nonspecific symptoms that are often missed by healthcare professionals and women themselves.

University of South Australia postdoctoral researcher, Dr Amanda Lumsden, with a transdisciplinary team, is hoping to rectify this by co-designing a user-friendly symptom assessment tool for ovarian cancer, thanks to a $45,087 Catalyst grant from Health Translation SA (HTSA).

Via an online ovarian cancer symptom scoping survey, researchers will gather feedback from people with lived experience of ovarian cancer (as well as clinicians) to help develop a prototype symptom assessment tool. The tool will detail potential symptoms and risk factors for ovarian cancer and will lay the groundwork for a larger study to test how well the prototype performs.

Dr Lumsden, a Research Fellow based in UniSA’s Australian Centre for Precision Health, says that unlike mammograms and cervical screening tests that help detect breast and cervical cancer at an early stage, there are no public screening programs for picking up ovarian cancer early.

“Women with ovarian cancer may experience nonspecific symptoms for up to two or more years before the tumour becomes clinically apparent, and often do not connect these symptoms with cancer,” Dr Lumsden says. “By then, the tumour has usually progressed to an advanced stage.”

“Abdominal issues, including bloating, pain and loss of appetite are red flags. If there is a family history of ovarian cancer, this should also be considered. Some other factors are linked to lower risk, such as having children, and having ever used oral contraceptives.

“We are hoping to identify common symptoms, patterns and themes experienced by people who have experienced an ovarian cancer diagnosis and use these findings to inform the development of the tool.”

“This is a very exciting avenue of research, and an important first step in a larger program of work,” says Professor Elina Hyppönen, who leads the group. If we can find a way to identify high risk women at an earlier stage, this can increase the available treatment options, and hopefully help to ensure better treatment outcomes.”

The online ovarian cancer symptom scoping survey is open until 20 June. Take the survey here:

 https://unisasurveys.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3KuR3ohn99UX48K

………………………………………………………………………………………………

Media contact: Melissa Keogh, Communications Officer, UniSA M: +61 403 659 154 E: melissa.keogh@unisa.edu.au

Researcher contact: Dr Amanda Lumsden E: amanda.lumsden@unisa.edu.au

Other articles you may be interested in

Inside the ACT’s Traffic Management Centre

Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

Staff monitor traffic flow on 30 screens, from over 130 CCTV cameras across Canberra.

In brief:

  • The ACT has a Traffic Management Centre.
  • Centre staff monitor traffic flow around the territory and make changes to traffic signals as needed.
  • This article contains more about the traffic management process.

The ACT’s Traffic Management Centre is the nerve centre for the road network.

For 12 hours a day, centre staff monitor traffic flow on 30 screens, from over 130 CCTV cameras.

They make changes to traffic signals as needed. This helps reduce congestion and improve travel times for motorists.

Staff work with a range of different people, including bus drivers and construction project managers, to do so.

There are several major public and private construction projects underway in the city. The Centre plays an integral role in ensuring motorists, pedestrians and cyclists get where they need to safely and efficiently.

Traffic Management Centre insights

  • Fewer people are on the roads on Mondays and Fridays.
  • Wednesdays are the busiest day on the roads.
  • Peak travel times on weekdays are from 7.30am to 9.30am and 4pm to 6pm. If you can, it’s best to try to travel outside of this time.
  • Routes into the western side of the city, including Edinburgh Avenue and Marcus Clarke Street, are particularly busy in the morning and evening peak times. Motorists are encouraged to take alternate routes where possible.

Keeping Canberrans informed

Hundreds of Bluetooth ‘sniffers’ on the road network also give live anonymous travel time data to the centre.

This data is then placed on variable message signs, including on the Monaro Highway and Tuggeranong Parkway.

They state how long it will take to get to the city via different routes.

Centre staff are always prepared to respond and coordinate with relevant agencies in case of:

  • an accident
  • a vehicle breakdown
  • a special event
  • congestion
  • debris on the road
  • hazards related to weather.

Stay up to date on travel changes in the city at the Built for CBR website.

Read more like this


Get ACT news and events delivered straight to your inbox, sign up to our email newsletter:


ACCP to lead research into European child abuse responses

Source:

08 May 2025

ACCP researcher Dr James Herbert will lead the project to analyse the Barnahus model .

UniSA’s Australian Centre for Child Protection (ACCP) will lead research into the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary and child friendly response to child sexual abuse in Europe.

ACCP has been awarded a $910,000 Oak Foundation grant to help evaluate the impact of the Barnahus response to child abuse.

The Barnahus model (translates to ‘Children’s House’ in Icelandic) is a multidisciplinary and child friendly response to child sexual abuse in Europe that aims to bring together all relevant professionals under one roof, creating a safe and child-centred environment for investigation and support.

Dr James Herbert will lead the million-dollar research project with partners in the United Kingdom and Germany to better understand the variations in how countries implement Barnahus and how to measure the impact of these different models for children.

“The project will evaluate the impact of Barnahus in Europe and look at the evidence,” says Dr Herbert.

“An Australian being awarded this grant for a project in Europe is a really important recognition of the work that ACCP has done to date in advancing research into multidisciplinary responses like Children’s Advocacy Centres (CAC) and Barnahus.”

Along with research into multi-disciplinary models in Australia, Dr Herbert has a strong track record of international collaboration.

This has included a national survey of CACs in the United States to identify the scale of resources they had to support children, contributing to a review of medical services at the Chicago CAC, supervising a research project in Canada into the alignment of multi-disciplinary teams, and serving on the international evaluation advisory committee for the Scottish ‘Bairns Hoose’.

The research team will work closely with the Barnahus Network and their membership on the project across 28 countries in Europe.

 “The Barnahus approach is an excellent example of what systems change can look like and what’s possible when we put children at the centre of our considerations,” Dr Herbert says. “Long term, I’m hoping that we will be able to bring the learning and experience from this work back to Australia.”

The ACCP has received the Oak Foundation grant under their Prevent Child Sexual Abuse Programme.

The ACCP is Australia’s premier research centre for the prevention of child abuse and neglect; the Director is currently Professor Leah Bromfield (2025 Australian of the Year for SA). It was established by the Commonwealth Government in partnership with the University of South Australia in 2004 to better prevent and respond to child abuse and neglect by helping to not only grow the evidence base but also translate it into practice.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Contact for interview: Dr James Herbert M: +61 402 298 734 E: james.herbert@unisa.edu.au

Media contact: Candy Gibson M: +61 434 605 142 E: candy.gibson@unisa.edu.au

Other articles you may be interested in

K’gari’s annual planned burning program ignites for 2025

Source: Tasmania Police

Issued: 7 May 2025

The flames of protection and renewal are lighting up K’gari once again as the island’s annual collaborative planned burning program sparks into action.

From now through July, fire-trained Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service (QPWS) rangers and their firefighting partners will be leading the charge across key areas of the island to safeguard its unique ecosystems and protect vital infrastructure.

After a soggy start to the year, including the impacts of Ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred and a bustling Easter holiday season, QPWS has officially launched this year’s planned burn initiative.

In late April, the first planned burns were carefully conducted at the Dundubara camping area.

Over a two-day operation, rangers expertly applied low-intensity fire to reduce fuel loads around the popular campground and nearby dingo exclusion fence.

The result was a safer, more resilient landscape – better prepared for bushfire season and the next phase of aerial planned burns.

Senior Ranger Linda Behrendorff emphasised the importance of timing and ecological balance.

“Now is the prime time for planned burning on K’gari,” Ranger Linda said.

“We take many factors into account – like seasonal wildlife movements, peak visitor periods, and recent weather patterns – to ensure every burn benefits the environment and the community.”

Planned burns play a critical role in QPWS’s long-term fire management strategy.

By creating a diverse mosaic of burnt and unburnt areas, these efforts help reduce bushfire intensity, support biodiversity, and promote healthier ecosystems across the K’gari section of Great Sandy National Park.

Visitors to K’gari over the coming months are encouraged to stay informed, respect Ranger instructions, and look out for signage related to fire operations.

For your safety and the safety of others:

  • Never enter closed areas
  • Only light campfires in designated zones
  • If smoke is present, stay indoors, close windows and doors, and keep respiratory medication handy

For the latest updates, visit the QPWS Fire Management webpage or stay connected via Park Alerts and @QldParkAlerts on X (formerly Twitter).