Next stage for key road upgrades in Brisbane’s north

Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

A major step forward in busting congestion in Brisbane’s north is underway, with a new contract awarded to deliver significant upgrades to the Gateway Motorway and Bruce Highway.

The Gateway to Bruce Upgrade (G2BU) will tackle long‑standing congestion and safety issues on one of North Brisbane’s busiest transport corridors.

The project combines the delivery of the $1 billion Gateway Motorway, Bracken Ridge to Pine River upgrade and the $948 million Bruce Highway (Brisbane – Gympie) Gateway Motorway to Dohles Rocks Road upgrade (Stage 1).

These works are jointly funded, with the Australian Government investing more than $1.5 billion and the Queensland Government investing $389.6 million.

The upgrade involves providing additional lanes on the Gateway Motorway, improving the motorway curve at Bracken Ridge and upgrades to the Bruce Highway interchange with the Gateway Motorway and Gympie Arterial Road, south of the Pine River.

The contract has been awarded to Gateway Connect Joint Venture (GCJV) – a partnership between CPB, BMD and Georgiou, with designers GHD and BG&E.

With significant population growth driving increased travel demand, traffic volumes through this corridor are expected to rise by around 50 per cent by 2041.

Currently, around 160,000 vehicles travel daily between the Moreton Bay Region and north Brisbane via the Gateway Motorway, Bruce Highway and Gympie Arterial Road.

Quotes attributable to Treasurer Jim Chalmers

“We’re backing the Bruce with billions in the Budget, and this major milestone means we’re making progress,” he said.

“This is a big investment in easing congestion in our communities and growing the Queensland economy.

“It will better connect the Bruce Highway and the Gateway Motorway and that will deliver big benefits for Brisbane.

“As a Queenslander I know how important the Bruce is to our state.

“The Bruce transports people, goods and opportunities and links local communities and economies right around regional Queensland.

“As Treasurer and as a Queenslander I’m especially proud of the billions we’ve found to back the Bruce.”

Quotes attributable to Federal Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government Catherine King

“The project will support growing traffic demands and improve safety on the National Highway.

“We are committed to bolstering the economy in Queensland through strategic infrastructure investment.

“This commitment by the Australian Government will greatly benefit freight movement, local and regional commuters, and holiday makers.

“Without additional capacity, this vital section of the national highway will face longer periods of heavy congestion.”

Quotes attributable to Queensland Minister for Transport and Main Roads Brent Mickelberg

The upgrades will deliver real benefits for communities across Brisbane, Moreton Bay and the Sunshine Coast.

“Traffic comes to standstill on this section every morning and afternoon.

“We’re taking action – this is a real plan backed by real investment – to tackle congestion on this notorious stretch of road.

“The upgrade is about reducing travel times for motorists travelling between Brisbane and the Sunshine Coast and helping those heading to the airport or back home to Moreton Bay.

“The Gateway to Bruce Upgrade is a prime example of how we’re investing to deliver for Queenslanders and making a real difference in their lives.”

Quotes attributable to Federal Member for Petrie Emma Comer

“This investment is critical for our growing region, and the Gateway Motorway and Bruce Highway are two of the busiest roads in South East Queensland, and they are only going to get busier. I’m proud of the investment by the Federal Government, delivered in partnership with the Queensland Government.

“This investment in our critical road infrastructure will play a massive role in increasing safety and reducing travel times, something I know local residents have been asking for.”

Arrest – Aggravated assault – Humpty Doo

Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

The Northern Territory Police Force has arrested a 38-year-old man in relation to multiple unprovoked aggravated assaults that occurred in Stuart Park last week.

Between Friday 17 October and Wednesday 22 October 2025, the Joint Emergency Services Communication Centre received multiple reports that an unknown man attended a unit complex on Winston Street multiple times, assaulting two people on separate occasions and causing property damage.

It is alleged the offender assaulted the first victim, punching him to the head several times before the victim was able to retreat and secure himself inside his unit. The offender fled the scene, returning the following day and smashed the victim’s vehicle windscreen.

On Tuesday 21 October, the offender again returned to the unit complex, allegedly armed with an offensive weapon and was reported to have been looking through the windows at the complex.

The following day, the offender allegedly returned to the location and waited in a vacant parking bay before approaching a man who was unlocking his front door. The offender punched the man multiple times before placing him in a headlock and continuing to assault the victim until he fell to the ground. Witnesses disturbed the offender, who then kicked the victim to the head before fleeing the scene.

Police attended the scene following each incident and Strike Force Trident took carriage of the investigation. The offender is not believed to be known to the victims.

This morning, around 9:55am, Strike Force Trident, with assistance of the Territory Response Group, executed a planned of the offender at a shopping complex along Freds Pass Road.

During the apprehension, the offender failed to comply with instruction and a taser was successfully deployed.

He was subsequently taken into custody without further incident. He was medically assessed and conveyed to the Palmerston Watch House.

He remains in police custody with charges expected to follow.

Police urge anyone with information about the incidents to make contact on 131 444 quoting reference number NTP2500105217. Anonymous reports can be made through Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or via https://crimestoppersnt.com.au/.

Dam search complete near Yunta

Source: South Australia Police

Police, with the assistance of SES, have drained and searched a dam on a property in the State’s Mid North, however, there has been no sign of missing four-year-old Gus.

Police, including Major Crime and Water Operations Unit, along with SES attended the property this morning.

The operation to drain the main dam into the southern dam commenced at 9.15am today.  It took about three and a half hours to drain the large dam, pumping water at approximately 15,000 litres per minute.  A total of 3.2 million litres of water was removed from the dam.

Police divers have thoroughly searched the main dam and the holding dam, including clearing of weed beds, however, there was nothing of significance found.

The 3.2 million litres of water was then pumped back into the dam, with very little loss of water in the process.

Police thank SES for their invaluable assistance in this operation.

Serious crash at Sandilands

Source: South Australia Police

Emergency services are at the scene of a serious crash at Sandilands on the Yorke Peninsula.

The collision occurred just before 3pm on Friday 31 October on Sandy Church Road, Sandilands, near the intersection of Davies Road.

There are reports of serious injuries.

Motorists should avoid the area.

STEM day ignites passion for innovation and engineering across Hunter region

Source: Mental Health Australia

From designing bridges to building bee boxes for the project, local students received a taste of the fascinating world of STEM as part of the M1 extension to Raymond Terrace project’s most recent open day. 

This year’s event built on the success of the 2024 flagship taster, expanding its scope and impact to provide students with a deeper, hands-on experience of STEM in action.

The open day was part of the project’s Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education program.

On Wednesday, more than 50 local students joined educators and industry professionals to celebrate the role of STEM in shaping infrastructure and community outcomes.

Transport for NSW’s Infrastructure, Projects & Engineering Regional Hub Executive Director Belinda Ritchie said the M1 extension’s STEM taster event aimed to inspire local students by giving them a behind-the-scenes glimpse into how major infrastructure is built.

“The STEM Day reflects the project’s commitment to leaving a legacy that goes beyond physical infrastructure,” Ms Ritchie said.

“This is a fantastic opportunity for local students to have a hands-on experience learning about all the intricacies of building legacy infrastructure, right in their backyards.

“By engaging young people in meaningful, career-focused experiences, the program aims to spark curiosity, build confidence and inspire future pathways in science, technology, engineering and mathematics.”

Students from Maitland Grossmann and Hunter River high schools and Catherine McAuley Catholic College participated in a full-day program designed to showcase real-world applications of STEM. 

Activities included surveying, materials testing, road design, bridge building, environmental assessments and safety challenges—each aligned with current infrastructure practices and delivered by industry experts.

The event was developed in collaboration with the Department of Education, with students selected through an expression of interest process targeting Year 11 and 12 students studying STEM subjects.

“Days such as this give students the opportunity to explore various careers in civil construction, interact with industry professionals, and witness firsthand how STEM principles are applied in real-world projects,” Ms Ritchie said.

“Once completed, the M1 extension to Raymond Terrace – along with the Hexham Straight Widening project – will transform the way road users travel to, from and around the Hunter.”

The M1 Pacific Motorway extension and Hexham Straight widening projects are being funded jointly with a total investment of $2.24 billion – $1.792 billion provided by the Australian Government and $448 million from the NSW Government. 

More information about the M1 extension project is available at https://caportal.com.au/tfnsw/m1rt

The Hexham Straight Widening project’s website also has more information at https://caportal.com.au/tfnsw/hexham-straight

Interview with Hamish Macdonald, Sydney Mornings, ABC Radio

Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

Hamish Macdonald:

The Treasurer, Jim Chalmers is here this morning. He’s delivered a keynote speech at a huge economic conference here in Sydney.

In part he’s announcing plans to make it easier for foreign companies to invest in Australia, to invest here in Sydney as well.

Jim Chalmers, a very good morning to you.

Jim Chalmers:

Good morning, Hamish, thanks for having me back on your show.

Macdonald:

I will get to some of that listener advice on the energy market later –

Chalmers:

Look forward to it.

Macdonald:

– but I want to talk to you about your speech this morning. Under the proposal you’re saying there’d be automatic approvals for so‑called trusted investors in Australia. What is it that’s slowing things down for foreign investment here?

Chalmers:

First of all, this comes from our recognition that if we want the economy to grow in a stronger, more sustainable way, we need more investment. And more investment would make our economy more productive, but it’s also good for our workers and businesses and local economies right around Australia, including here in Sydney.

And so that’s the objective, is to attract more investment. And so the second round of changes that I’m flagging today about foreign investment are all about making the system work faster for low‑risk applications and stronger for higher‑risk applications.

And what I mean by that is that by processing these applications, for people who desperately want to invest in our country, by processing the low‑risk ones faster, we get more of that investment, we attract more of that investment, and that’s good for our economy and our people. But we maintain the ability to scrutinise quite robustly investment in areas which are higher risk, like energy generation, like critical minerals, like critical data and critical infrastructure.

And so we’re not proposing to water down the foreign investment regime or weaken it, we’re proposing to strengthen it, but also to make it faster so that we can attract more of that investment.

Macdonald:

You describe in your speech though a sort of broader competition that Australia is in amongst countries all over the world to attract this investment. What’s the argument or the pitch that you’re making for Australia, ‘cause you’re sort of saying: look, these are complicated times, we’re a better bet. What’s the basis for that?

Chalmers:

I spend a lot of time here talking with big investors and recently on Wall Street in New York City. And one of the things which is very clear from all of that engagement is that Australia is becoming more and more attractive as the world becomes less and less reliable. There’s a lot of global economic uncertainty and volatility, and in that context Australia is seen as a reliable destination for investment. That’s a very good thing for Australia, and we have to make the most of it.

And what investors like about Australia is that our economic fundamentals are very good, obviously our proximity to Asia is very helpful, we’ve got a good skills base, we’ve got big opportunities in energy and technology and critical minerals. And so we’ve got this combination of advantages which make us a very compelling opportunity, and we intend to make the most of it.

Macdonald:

So can you place that pitch in the context of what Kevin Rudd, the Ambassador to the US, has been pitching in Sydney over the last 2 days around Australian super funds investing in the US, because that’s a good opportunity for our super. I’ve noticed as we’ve talked a lot about super in the last couple of weeks, a lot of listeners asking: hang on, why aren’t we directing this investment into Australia and some of the things that we know that we need here?’

Chalmers:

Because it’s not an either, or. The 2‑way investment is really important as well, and we’ve got this enormous pool of capital which comes from super and other sources.

It’s quite remarkable that in an economy which is I think 14th or 15th biggest in the world, we’ve actually got the fourth biggest pool of retirement savings, and very soon we’ll have the second biggest in the world. And so our funds are investing in ways that deliver the best return for their members, there’s huge investments in our own country, but it also is a force multiplier for us in the world.

Superannuation will always primarily be about getting the best returns that we can for the members of those super funds, but it’s a force for good in our own economy, it’s a force multiplier in the world as well, and it’s one of those advantages that we leverage.

And so I work very closely with Kevin Rudd and the superannuation industry to make sure that we’re getting the most of this remarkable opportunity, which is superannuation.

Macdonald:

Could you tease that out a bit, because I think when we were obviously all covering the meeting between the Prime Minister and President Trump, a lot of listeners quite surprised to see their super being a topic of conversation in what’s a much broader geopolitical conversation. What do you mean by force multiplier; why is super something that might be used to the nation’s advantage in those broader arenas?

Chalmers:

Again, primarily, I want to reassure all of your listeners, primarily, first, second and third, the main game for super is to deliver good returns for people’s retirements. That will always be the main game.

But at the same time, it does help us strengthen our economic relationships and partnerships with other countries. And that forecast that President Trump and Prime Minister Albanese and Ambassador Rudd were talking about in Washington DC reflects one very important part of an economic relationship with the US which is of mutual interest.

And so to your listeners thinking about their own superannuation, the funds that their superannuation is held in, they are looking first and foremost and always to get the best returns that they can. But for Australia, the fact that we’ve got these trillions of dollars of investment in Australia, but also around the world, is a very good thing for Australia. It makes us a much more attractive partner, and that’s good for our workers, our businesses, our investors and our local communities.

Macdonald:

What sort of things in the United States might those super investments go into, because I think in part we’re looking at sort of capital infrastructure, the renewal of a lot of the ageing kind of roads and bridges in the United States.

Chalmers:

All kinds of investment. I mean it’s not typically limited, but each fund makes its own decisions. They’ve got investment managers, they look around the world for the best opportunities.

But again, even though there is substantial investment going into the United States, a lot of these funds are investing in those kinds of assets in Australia, in energy assets, in infrastructure, in artificial intelligence and digital economy infrastructure. All of these things which are really important to a new generation of economic growth in our country. Superannuation’s playing a really helpful and a meaningful role here, not just overseas.

Macdonald:

Jim Chalmers, the federal Treasurer is here. Louise in Katoomba’s texted him with a question: ‘If we’re so desirable for investment here in Australia, why are companies closing because of energy costs?’

Now I suspect Louise is referring to Tomago, the aluminium smelter, which we’ve been reporting about here on 702 this week. Between you and the state government you’ve effectively offered a billion‑dollar bail‑out package which Rio Tinto’s rejected. Like, that doesn’t look like a great space for investment, does it?

Chalmers:

Primarily that’s a commercial decision being flagged by Rio, they’ve flagged a consultation process around Tomago. We’ve been working with them, the Industry Minister, we’ve been working with them, and the state government of New South Wales on that for a couple of months now. It’s obviously a very concerning development.

But when it comes to the overall levels of investment in our economy, and Louise’s question that she texted you, investment levels are relatively high, but we need them to be higher.

One of the reasons why we engage in the way that I have been today in Sydney to attract more investment is because we’ve got remarkable industrial opportunities in this country. And in order to make the most of them we need to attract the capital, we need to attract the investment. And it’s possible to do that while recognising that some operations, like Rio’s operation in Tomago and some of the other smelting in other parts of Australia, are going through a difficult time right now and we continue to work with the companies to see if there’s a responsible way for government to help.

Macdonald:

If you can’t do a deal with Rio for them to keep Tomago open, what are the other options you’re looking at as a government.

Chalmers:

I don’t want to flag those, because we are in discussions obviously via Tim Ayres, the Industry Minister, we wouldn’t ordinarily flag those kinds of contingencies and hypotheticals.

But I assure Louise and all of your listeners that if there’s something responsible that we can do there to help, obviously we will consider that. It is a difficult time for the workers in particular, as this consultation process has kicked off in the Hunter.

We’ve engaged with the company, the state government’s got a role here as well, we’ve been talking to them too, to see if there’s anything responsible that we could do.

Macdonald:

We’ve got news headlines coming up with a couple of minutes’ time. Just on energy prices and inflation, inflation figures came out came out this week showing a rise. The former Treasury boss, Ken Henry, had this to say on AM.

[Excerpt]

Ken Henry:

If you have to provide a permanent or semi‑permanent rebate for something, then you’re saying that your policy settings are wrong, you know, your energy policy settings are wrong, there’s just something else that – you can’t have these quick fixes become permanent.

[End of excerpt]

Macdonald:

Are you looking at getting rid of those energy rebates?

Chalmers:

They’re not permanent. I mean Ken’s not right to suggest that they are permanent rebates. We’ve said on a number of occasions that we review them from budget to budget. They won’t be in the budget forever. They’re an important way to help people take some of the edge off their electricity bills. And so we funded them for the last little while, but we’ve made it clear that they’re not a permanent feature of the budget. We’ll have another look at them as we get closer to the mid‑year budget update and the budget in May, but they won’t be in the budget forever.

When it comes to the broader issues that Ken raises – obviously I’ve got a lot of respect for Ken, I spend a bit of time with Ken, and I listened carefully to the back end of your listener in conversation a moment ago – we’ve got a review underway of the National Energy Market to look at some of these structural issues. But we’ve also got this thing called the Capacity Investment Scheme, which is already doing a good job attracting more investment in cleaner and cheaper energy into the grid.

One of the problems we’ve got with the grid is not the new renewable stuff coming on to the grid, it’s the fact that the old stuff, the coal‑fired stuff is becoming less and less reliable, and it will exit the system at some point. And so the Capacity Investment Scheme’s playing an important role, we’ve got other policies which are playing an important role.

So we’re not choosing between near‑term relief or a longer‑term investment and reform of the energy market. We’re doing both simultaneously. There are good reasons to do that, but we won’t be able to afford to do the electricity rebate forever. It may be that when we consider it at some future point that we’ll make an announcement about that then, but it’s not a permanent rebate as Ken Henry was suggesting in your interview.

Macdonald:

All right. We do have to get to the news shortly. I know you’ve been on a big trip over the last few weeks away from home. Will you be home in time for Halloween, taking the kids trick‑or‑treating?

Chalmers:

I’ll take them to basketball training, I think their mum’s going to take them trick‑or‑treating after that.

Macdonald:

Okay, Jim Chalmers, thank you very much.

Chalmers:

Thanks, Hamish, all the best.

Knife uncovered at western suburbs shopping centre

Source: South Australia Police

A man has been arrested after being found in possession of a knife at West Lakes.

Around 7pm on Thursday 30 October, Western District patrols searched a man at the West Lakes Shopping Centre, under Declared Shopping Precinct powers.

During the search, officers uncovered a knife in the man’s sock, and he was subsequently arrested.

The 48-year-old from Royal Park was charged with carrying an offensive weapon in a public precinct and bailed to the Port Adelaide Magistrates Court on 27 November.

Police will continue to exercise powers under the Summary Offences Act to keep the community safe within declared precincts across the state.

280463

370-2025: Services Restored: Friday 31 October 2025 – COLS

Source: Australia Government Statements – Agriculture

31 October 2025

Who does this notice affect?

All importers and customs brokers who will be required to lodge imported cargo documentation to the department for biosecurity assessment.

Information

Restored time:

As of: 01:20 Friday 31 October 2025 (AEDT).

Detail:

Between 16:15 Wednesday 08 October 2025 and 01:20 Friday 31 October 2025 (AEDT), the Cargo Online Lodgement System (COLS) had been experiencing an…

Interview with Trudy McIntosh, Sky News NewsDay

Source: Australia Government Statements 2

Trudy McIntosh, Host: It’s been a big week for the Prime Minister in Asia and it seems he’s managed to become almost Donald Trump’s bestie by the end of it. We saw this toast together at a dinner at the start of APEC before the President’s big meeting with President Xi of China. Donald Trump has flown all the way back to Washington now, leaving our Prime Minister there with other APEC leaders. Joining me live to discuss is the Assistant Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, Matt Thistlethwaite. Matt, as we see these pictures on our screen, we’re waiting for the family photo. Our Prime Minister will be there very shortly, we believe. What did you make of the big superpower showdown yesterday? President Trump and President Xi, it appears there’s an apparent thaw now in these relations. I’m sure we’d all welcome that?

Matt Thistlethwaite, Assistant Minister For Foreign Minister and Trade: Hi, Trudy. We’re definitely welcoming that news, particularly the thawing in the relationship regarding trade. No one wins from the escalation in trade protectionism. And we saw that the United States and China had put in place measures that restricted trade. So, it’s wonderful to see that these outcomes being reached. And Australia has always had the view that we want free and fair trade not only within our region, throughout the world, and this contributed to that. So, it’s a great outcome.

McIntosh: And what about Beijing has said now there’s a one year pause on that sudden export control they put in place for the rare earths. Does that have any impact on the deal that Australia has done in terms of the US deal here with our critical minerals?

Assistant Minister: Well, it’s welcome news because a lot of the magnets associated with medical technology that Australians rely on every day are produced in China. And there was a concern that that could have an effect on our medical industry. I guess what we’ve entered into with the United States is around building our capacity into the future. Australia’s been very good at extracting the rare earths and critical minerals that we have here in Australia, but we’ve tended to ship them overseas for processing. The Future Made in Australia policy is about ensuring that we’re investing in processing them here, that we increase our sovereign capability and that we get better returns from that. And now we’re partnering with the United States to get those investment funds in so that we can develop that capacity here in Australia.

McIntosh: And Matt, standby, I just want to take our viewers to Dan Tehan, the Shadow Energy Minister. He’s just come out of this meeting where they were discussing net zero. Let’s have a listen.

[throws to Dan Tehan press conference]

McIntosh: That’s the Shadow Energy and Emissions Reduction Minister, Dan Tehan, that meeting of backbench Liberal MPs wrapping up there, but still the big question is what is going to happen with that net zero target? And for now, there is still no formal position on that out of the Liberals or the Nationals. I want to bring back in the Assistant Foreign Minister, Matt Thistlethwaite, who we were speaking to before. Matt, you were listening to Dan Tehan there. I suppose the question for Labor is what are you doing to bring sections of the community who clearly have a real worry about net zero and the impact on the regions in particular, what is Labor doing to bring that cohort with them?

Assistant Minister: Well, it sounded from Dan Tehan there, Trudy, that they’ve agreed they’ve had a meeting this morning to agree to have another meeting. They’re all at sea when it comes to this issue. There’s a significant proportion of their party that are sceptical about climate change and they’re forcing this scepticism on net zero and that’s providing uncertainty. What the Australian people want is certainty and they want a government that’s committed to taking stronger action on climate change. So, we reduce emissions, but at the same time we transition to renewable energy. And what we’ve done to bring the Australian people with us is provide that certainty through a policy that net zero architecture, policies like the safeguard mechanism, our household battery scheme, our large investments in solar and wind and renewables is all providing that certainty for businesses and households to make that important transition.

McIntosh: Matt, there’s certainty in terms of where Labor is going, but I suppose the other big thing we’re seeing highlighted this week is the uncertainty that’s there for these big smelters. For example, Tomago, the one in lights at the moment, this stalemate with the owner, Rio Tinto over, they’re refusing to take the taxpayer lifeline. They want to lock in a cheaper energy deal from 2028. What lengths is the government willing to go to keep Tomago open?

Assistant Minister: Well, firstly, Trudy, my thoughts are with the workers. There’s thousands of workers there who’ve worked very hard for this company and we want to see Tomago survive. That’s why we’re committed to working with the company to put in place a package that sees it survive into the future regarding their energy costs. They had a very good contract with the NSW Government that’s up for renewal. That’s why the NSW Government is involved in these negotiations. So, you’ve got the NSW Government and our government working with Tomago to try to get them the most favourable energy contract, but also to put in place measures from a Commonwealth level to ensure that the company survives. So, we’re willing to work with them and do whatever we can to keep that company open.

McIntosh: Would there be an option of potential new ownership? I saw in the Financial Review this morning the that government’s not ruling anything out, including that?

Assistant Minister: Well, that’s really a matter for Tomago. They’ve got their owning companies and their shareholders. That’s a matter for them. But they should be under no illusion that the Commonwealth Government and indeed the NSW Government are committed to working with them to try and ensure that the company survives. It’s an important employer in the Hunter region. It produces high quality aluminium that’s sold domestically and on international markets. And we want to be a government and an economy that continues to make important products such as that.

McIntosh: Assistant Foreign Minister, Matt Thistlethwaite, really appreciate your time today. Thank you.

Assistant Minister: Thank you, Trudy.

Interview with Patricia Karvelas, Afternoon Briefing

Source: Australia Government Statements 2

Patricia Karvelas: Anne Aly is the Minister for Multicultural Affairs, International Development and Small Business, and is my guest. Minister, welcome to the program.

Dr Anne Aly: Thank you, Patricia.

Patricia Karvelas: We have to start there, and then we’ll get on to some other issues that we’re focusing on here. The Business Council wants a few elements of the environment laws changed. They are still wanting bipartisanship. Are you prepared as a government at sort of cabinet level where these fights are being had to water down the bill further to meet their demands.

Dr Anne Aly: Well, as you heard there with all of those grabs that you had, pretty much everyone’s got an opinion around this bill. We’re focused on getting the bill passed and getting the balance right between ensuring that our environment is protected but also that there is confidence for industry as well. You know, you’ll be familiar, and perhaps your viewers are also familiar with the Samuel Review that recommended strongly that there be a review of these laws that, frankly, are no longer fit for purpose. They are, you know, laws that were drafted back in the 90s.

And, you know, following on from that review and undertaking the recommendations of that review, one of those recommendations of that review was that the bill not be split, that splitting the bill would water down our environmental protections, but also not give that certainty to business.

Patricia Karvelas: You are a frontbencher but also from WA. We all know WA kind of flexed your muscle, if you like, or the Premier did and clearly believes that that’s a view in the community. So given that, I’m going to ask a very straight question.

Dr Anne Aly: Okay.

Patricia Karvelas: Do you prefer a deal with the Liberals over the Greens?

Dr Anne Aly: I prefer a deal that’s going to get us to that position where we have an EPBC Act that looks after the environment and that gives certainty to –

Patricia Karvelas: Would it be your preference, given the WA point I make, to have that deal with the Liberal Party?

Dr Anne Aly: Well, I’m not the one making the deal, so I’ll –

Patricia Karvelas: No, but you were – and you echoed some of Roger Cook’s concern. You didn’t shy away from that, so.

Dr Anne Aly: No, that’s right, and, you know, given that I am not the one making the deal, what I see is that there are two pathways to making a deal – one with the Greens and one with the Libs. And I believe that Murray Watt, as the minister responsible, has done a fantastic job in negotiating thus far. What we want to do is get a bill that does what the review said it needs to do, and that is to bring our laws up to date. We want to get that passed, and we want to get that passed as soon as possible through either of those avenues, as long as it delivers what Australians want, what Australians need, which is environmental protections and certainty to the industry.

Patricia Karvelas: Minister, you were the former Childcare Minister before you took on your new role and came into cabinet. Four Corners tonight has a pretty explosive story just exposing how deep rooted the infiltration from paedophiles is into this sector. I’ve got a really straight question on that as well: were you aware of the extent of this when you were minister?

Dr Anne Aly: When I was minister, no. When I was minister. I will say, though, that very aware that child safety was top priority and remains top priority in early childhood education and care and that the government has taken a number of steps towards ensuring child safety, among them the early childhood education register, which is something that I put into train very early on in my term as the previous minister. Child safety – and let me also make this very clear: that the revelations that are coming out are absolutely devastating – absolutely devastating.

Patricia Karvelas: Does it worry you, though, that you say you didn’t know the extent, but there are obviously many documents that Four Corners has scoured through and obtained to make this case about how serious it is. Was that because you weren’t given the right information? Look, I’m just wondering how this, at the highest levels and then at a state level, was missed as a critical and crisis issue.

Dr Anne Aly: Yeah, I believe that we acted swiftly to rectify all of that, though. I believe that, you know, as soon as the first revelations came out, Jason Clare is the Minister for Education and myself, as the minister responsible for early childhood education at the time, were very swift in conducting a review of safety. And we now have a number of programs and policies in place to ensure child safety, but also that very clear message that early childhood education and care is about education, not about the profit. And if providers are doing the wrong thing or are only in it to make a profit and don’t care about child safety, then they need to vacate the space, so to speak. So as soon as we did learn about it, we were very, very swift in undertaking every action that we possibly could to ensure child safety.

Patricia Karvelas: But even Jason Clare’s conceded he should have acted earlier.

Dr Anne Aly: Well, we should have known earlier. That’s the thing. And the thing is, the framework for child quality and child safety, you’ve got the commonwealth framework and the state frameworks, so it’s a kind of two-level framework where the commonwealth kind of sets the quality standards, and then you have the state regulators doing the monitoring and so on and so forth. Obviously, there’s something going wrong there, and that’s what needs to be rectified.

Patricia Karvelas: Just finally on this – because I know it’s not your portfolio anymore, but you are very across it as an issue.

Dr Anne Aly: Of course.

Patricia Karvelas: The Productivity Commission recommended a commission with teeth be established to deal with the sector. Government hasn’t made a final decision on that, but it does it seem to you that the case is very clearly now been made for that?

Dr Anne Aly: Look, I think in terms of child safety, there are practical things that we can do that will have a practical impact that I think are much more effective – low-hanging fruit, so to speak – that will be much more effective than another kind of layer of regulation or bureaucracy.

Patricia Karvelas: So you’re not –

Dr Anne Aly: Well, I will just also clarify as well, Patricia, that the Productivity Commission recommendation about a commission was really about universal early childhood education and care.

Patricia Karvelas: That’s right.

Dr Anne Aly: So that commission would be responsible to oversee the rollout of –

Patricia Karvelas: But you could make alterations to it so it could have that kind of power and influence.

Dr Anne Aly: You could, but I do believe that right now the important thing is to ensure that what we have, the mechanisms that we do have, are working to ensure child safety, and that is what the government is doing.

Patricia Karvelas: The Prime Minister is overseas for a couple of key meetings. He’s not in the parliament this week – it’s a bit weird, actually, question time without him. How did it go for you? Was it a bit odd?

Dr Anne Aly: No, question time was question time, I guess.

Patricia Karvelas: Okay, you’re like another day, another dollar.

Dr Anne Aly: Another question time.

Patricia Karvelas: Okay. But on his raising of the issue in the South China Sea – and clearly what we have said is inappropriate from China – he’s raised that with the Chinese Premier. We don’t know what the Chinese Premier’s response is. But clearly this relationship is much more difficult to execute than, you know, we thought. Should the Prime Minister be telling us exactly where this relationship is at, what the response was?

Dr Anne Aly: Well, I think the relationship is clear. I mean, every minister that you’ve probably ever interviewed has said that we will work with China, but, you know, we will raise concerns where we need to raise concerns. Just on these two meetings with ASEAN and APEC, I just want to stress how important these two forums are, but also the fact that Australia has a seat at the table at these forums and what we’re using this seat at the table for. We’re using this seat at the table, yes, to ensure our regional security and economic prosperity, but also our domestic security and our domestic economic prosperity, too. If you a have a look at ASEAN, for example, 700 million people, fourth largest economy in the world, You know, by 2040 it will be the fourth largest economy in the world. If you have a look at APEC, one in four Australian jobs relies on trade, and 75 per cent of our trade is with APEC. These meetings really are also about ensuring the future and the present of Australian jobs.

Patricia Karvelas: But raising concerns with China and managing that, it seems that China is provoking Australia.

Dr Anne Aly: Well, you know, diplomatic relationships with countries at varying times can be challenging. And I believe that our government has done substantial work within our region to repair the relationship with China, to restore our critical trade with China. That has really helped Australian industries here. But we will speak up when we need to speak up in Australia’s interests.

Patricia Karvelas: I just have to ask on your hat – I know I’ve moved around on a few issues –

Dr Anne Aly: I’ve got a lot of hats today with you.

Patricia Karvelas: And I’ve called them all hats – let’s call it something else – a cap.

Dr Anne Aly: Tiaras?

Patricia Karvelas: Tiara! With your tiara on, just looking at multiculturalism, you know, that’s a pretty key part of how our country operates.

Dr Anne Aly: Absolutely.

Patricia Karvelas: Both of us being products of it. It’s how we operate this country. But you’ve been – we’ve now had a ceasefire in Gaza – it happened while I was away – and I think that’s a welcome thing.

Dr Anne Aly: Absolutely.

Patricia Karvelas: Have you seen some of the tensions lower since that ceasefire in our own community?

Dr Anne Aly: A bit hard to say because it’s really early days yet, and the ceasefire is very fragile and tentative. So I note that, like, there are still some protests going on, although they’ve come down a little bit. I do believe that there is some kind of easing of the tension, and that’s inevitable because when you have tensions flaring whenever there are global events, as those global events pass or progress, then, you know, there may be another global event. But, yeah, I think so. I think also, you know, I was in India recently, and I do have to say that the reception that I got in India was just how grateful the Indian people were for how our government responded to those protests.

Patricia Karvelas: Let me just pick you up on that. So you’re saying that when you were in India, the way that this debate about Indian Australians had been had was raised with you?

Dr Anne Aly: Yes. And people were very grateful for the response that our government had in not tolerating any kind of racism in those protests and in defending our Indian diaspora. Because our diasporas are really important keys to our relations with foreign governments as well. Those people-to-people links are bridges between us and other countries. And it was really heartening to see that that message had gotten through very clearly to the people in India.

Patricia Karvelas: There’s just one more question relating to this. I know it’s Tony Burke’s main role, but you are assisting very much in this. This is the anti-Semitism report, the Islamophobia report.

Dr Anne Aly: Yes.

Patricia Karvelas: When are we going to see a comprehensive government response to those?

Dr Anne Aly: Well, you know, we’re currently undertaking that. And so we’re looking at both reports, looking at what we’ve already done, looking at what we can do. And that’s underway.

Patricia Karvelas: Is this by the end of the year?

Dr Anne Aly: I don’t want to put a time frame on it because it is a big piece of work, and it’s an incredibly important piece of work, and I think it’s important that we get it right. The efforts that Aftab Malik, as the Islamophobia Envoy, and Jillian Segal, as the anti-Semitism Envoy, have put into the reports deserve us to take our time and be thoughtful and comprehensive in our response.

Patricia Karvelas: Minister, thank you for travelling on many different topics with me. I appreciate it.

Dr Anne Aly: Thank you so much.