Consultation open for Pillar Two legislative instrument

Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

We’ve published a draft legislative instrument LI 2025/D17 Taxation Administration (Exemptions from Requirement to Lodge Australian IIR/UTPR tax return and Australian DMT tax return) Determination 2025 and an explanatory statement. These are available for public consultation until 24 September.

The draft LI 2025/D17 is a determination that’s designed to provide relief from certain lodgment obligations for in-scope multinational enterprise (MNE) groups in circumstances where top-up tax amounts will always be nil.

However, you’ll still be required to lodge a tax return in circumstances where top-up tax amounts may not always be nil.

The instrument sets out circumstances in which a group entity of an in-scope MNE group does not need to lodge the below tax returns for a fiscal year:

  • an Australian IIR/UTPR Tax Return, and/or
  • the Australian DMT Tax Return.

It doesn’t exempt lodgment of either the:

  • GloBE Information Return (GIR), where local lodgment is required
  • foreign lodgment notification, where GIR is lodged in a foreign jurisdiction.

We’re calling for feedback from all MNE groups in Australia, as well as tax and legal professionals, advisers and consultants of MNE clients. You can provide comments directly to the contact person listed on the draft LI 2025/D17.

Consultation is open until 24 September.

Keep up to date

We have tailored communication channels for medium, large and multinational businesses, to keep you up to date with updates and changes you need to know.

Read more articles in our online Business bulletins newsroom.

Subscribe to our free:

  • fortnightly Business bulletins email newsletterExternal Link
  • email notifications about new and updated information on our website – you can choose to receive updates relevant to your situation. Choose the ‘Business and organisations’ category to ensure your subscription includes notifications for more Business bulletins newsroom articles like this one.

Citizen scientists and holidaymakers key to restoring confidence in SA’s algal bloom-hit coastline

Source:

28 August 2025

Getty Images.

With South Australia’s harmful algal bloom devastating coastal communities, a University of South Australia tourism expert is urging its local communities to show solidarity and find creative ways to support affected regions.

Adjunct Senior Lecturer in Tourism Management Dr Freya Higgins-Desbiolles is asking South Australians to rally behind coastal communities hit hard by the bloom which has killed thousands of marine animals and triggered widespread anxiety and economic pain.

For months the state’s coastline has been plagued by a large-scale bloom of Karenia mikimotoi, a harmful algae killing marine life and degrading once-thriving underwater ecosystems. The disaster has also dealt a heavy blow to local tourism and community livelihoods, and has the potential to extend into the peak holiday season.

Dr Higgins-Desbiolles says intrastate travellers should use the crisis as an opportunity to support affected communities by holidaying in coastal hotspots during the upcoming spring and summer holidays and by thinking creatively about how to spend time there.

“In addition to its economic value, tourism has potential social and ecological value, so we should be focusing on how it can connect our communities and support recovery,” she says. “We might rethink tourism to centre local communities and get their input into recovery policies and planning. As we head into summer, we’ll need to get creative with events that bring people together and help build resilience.

“Most tourism businesses along the SA coast remain open for business, and although the conditions of the water may differ from time to time, visiting the beach can still be enjoyed and other activities such as beach games and walks can be explored. Interstate visitors could also help by staying longer and ensuring their spending goes into local businesses, such as markets, shops, bakeries, pubs and wineries.”

Dr Higgins-Desbiolles says it could also be an ideal time for a niche group of tourists – citizen scientists – to visit affected areas, helping local communities to collect data and boost scientific understanding of the bloom.

“We could call upon certain types of visitors – volunteer tourists – who are keen to give back and help. For example, under water divers could visit our coastal areas and help with some of the scientific or restoration work,” she says.

“One of the most interesting insights into this crisis has been the number of people who are providing data on the scale of marine deaths. Citizen scientists have recorded 32,000 entries on 480 species of perished marine life, often through the iNaturalist website. These people are helping address the difficulty of the situation by contributing their time and energy.”

A recent survey by the Tourism Industry Council SA involving restaurants, hotels and marine tourism operators on the Yorke, Eyre and Fleurieu peninsulas, Kangaroo Island and metropolitan Adelaide found that 40% of SA businesses impacted by the algal bloom have experienced a downturn in trade.

The average year on year loss for a business in July 2025 was $52,000, while 14% of respondents reported losses of more than $100,000.

A dead seal washed up on a beach near Victor Harbor in South Australia. Getty Images.

Dr Higgins-Desbiolles says the biggest threat is to South Australia’s clean and green identity and its reputation for pristine coastal ecosystems and ecotourism.

“The tourism industry is going to be very hurt by the branding impact, particularly Kangaroo Island which is our key drawcard for tourism. The crisis has received attention in international media and so there’s a real concern for the long-term impact to our brand,” she says.

“It (the algal bloom) is not going to go away soon. What we will face in the upcoming summer is unknown, but we need to build that confidence among intrastate travellers that coastal areas are still enjoyable. Our beaches are still open for recreation, swimming and enjoyment.”

The State and Commonwealth governments’ $28.5 million support package allows eligible tourism businesses to apply for $10,000 small business grants. More recently, 20,000 travel vouchers for accommodation and experiences were announced in a bid to lure visitors to SA coastal regions ahead of the September school holidays.

South Australians can apply to win one of the Coast is Calling vouchers, which are similar in concept to travel vouchers launched during the COVID-19 pandemic to boost tourism.

Dr Higgins-Desbiolles says experience shows the vouchers do make a difference in sparking demand for local ‘staycations’ however changing mindsets and boosting confidence in coastal and marine environments is critical to easing people’s trepidations.

“We really must rethink the value of intrastate trips and remember that domestic holidays are about more than just our recreation – we can support each other,” she says. “Considering the increasing numbers of climate related crises in Australia – floods, bushfires and droughts – we will find the intrastate tourism market increasingly important.”

“Travelling within our own state is a source of real reliability and comfort for distressed communities.”

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Contact for interview: Dr Freya Higgins-Desbiolles, Adjunct Senior Lecturer in Tourism Management M: +61 406 019 222
E: Freya.HigginsDesbiolles@unisa.edu.au

Media contact: Melissa Keogh, Communications Officer, UniSA M: +61 403 659 154 E: melissa.keogh@unisa.edu.au

National reforms to child safety in early learning

Source: Murray Darling Basin Authority

As I walked into the Education Ministers Meeting on child safety on Friday, the stories of two strong women came with me.

First, the mother of a child abused in early learning who continues to carry the trauma she felt when first notified of the abuse. A mother who channels that trauma into the courage to advocate for children to be safe in early learning everywhere.

Her strength is both inspiring and devastating, because no mother should have to experience what she has, and every parent deserves to know their child is safe every day in early learning.

And I thought of a young educator I met in my first week as Minister three months ago, a passionate, dedicated educator committed to the children in her care.

She sees a future in early education, because she is supported and encouraged in her role, and because the Government’s 15 per cent pay rise is letting her see a future in the sector that she loves.

I am determined to deliver safe, quality early learning for our children. 

Early learning parents have confidence in.

Early learning that attracts and retains our workforce of dedicated educators. They are our nation’s greatest asset in keeping children safe.

Our task is to continue to back those educators who are there for the right reasons, doing incredible work, while closing the door on those who seek to do harm.

And our task is to support those providers who are there for the right reasons, and hold those operators who aren’t up to scratch to account.

That is what our $189 million package of reforms will do.

We are investing in strong oversight of who works in early education, where they are working, and how they work with children and families.

The first-ever nationwide register of early educators will allow regulators to see, for the first time, who is working in early education across the country.

It will allow regulators to identify patterns of behaviour, raise red flags, and share information about educator conduct across borders.

Child safety training will be mandatory, and managers will be required to take it alongside educators.

Child-safe culture comes from the top, and managers have a responsibility to ensure their educators are supported to actively raise and report issues of concern.

Personal mobile devices are banned in services from 1 September, with the States and Territories responsible for implementation. When educators are working with children, they cannot have their devices with them. Only service-issued devices can be used for taking approved images of children.

A rapid assessment of staff supervision arrangements by the Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA) will report back to ministers by the end of the year. The National Quality Framework sets the existing ratios that providers must follow at all times. We’ve heard too many reports about failure to follow staff-to-child ratios, and failure to provide active supervision of children. That needs to change.

CCTV is being used across many services now, and it’s time to assess its merits for keeping children safe, and the guardrails required for effective use. Our nationwide CCTV assessment program will do just that.

Providing parents with better information about standards in their services is critical too. It’s why we’ll fund ACECQA to improve the Starting Blocks website, so parents can see information such as the date a centre last had a regulatory visit, any conditions of approval, and compliance breaches. This will empower parents to make informed decisions about their child’s early learning.

Regulator visits to services will increase with greater investment from both the Commonwealth and the States and Territories. We will provide a $93 million investment in more spot checks and joint compliance work. The states have also committed more than $130 million to increase resources for their regulators – for more officers and more compliance checks.

In making these changes, we are standing shoulder to shoulder with the States and Territories and with the sector. Everyone is stepping up.

All of this work will help keep children safe in early learning.

And our agreement to make the rights and best interests of children the paramount consideration across the sector will reinforce that.

Together, these reforms mean that parents can have confidence in their child’s early learning centre and the people who care for them.

And children can get the lifelong benefits of safe, quality early learning.

Originally published in The Sector, Thursday, 28 August 2025

Repeat offender pleads guilty for illegally storing tonnes of tyres in Wacol

Source: Tasmania Police

Issued: 27 Aug 2025

Open larger image

Approximately 1,000 tonnes of used tires in Wacol

A man with an extensive history of environmental offences has pleaded guilty to the illegal storage and processing of approximately 1,000 tonnes of used tyres in Wacol.

Following a thorough investigation, the Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation (DETSI) commenced a prosecution against Wayne Simmons in April 2025.

The investigation revealed Mr Simmons failed to remove end-of-life tyres he was storing illegally, after being ordered to, later starting to shred them without an environmental authority (EA).

On Tuesday, 26 August 2025, Mr Simmons was sentenced in Richlands Magistrates Court and fined $50,000 after pleading guilty to two offences against the Environmental Protection Act 1994:

  • one offence of carrying out an environmentally relevant activity without holding, or acting under, an EA for the activity,
  • one offence of contravening an environmental protection order.

A critical factor in sentencing Mr Simmons was his extensive history of non-compliance with environmental and related laws, both personally and through various companies.

In January 2025, Mr Simmons was issued an environmental enforcement order to remove the tyres, which he has been complying with.

Jackie Mckeay, Executive Director, Waste and Enforcement Services, DETSI said she is pleased with the Court’s decision.

“We take this type of unlawful conduct seriously and hope this sentence serves as a clear warning to people who think they can ignore their environmental obligations.

“Tyres that are not properly managed and stored can pollute our soil and waterways, threaten native animals, damage fragile ecosystems, and can pose a significant fire risk.

“Unlicensed waste activities not only present significant environmental risks, but also unfairly undercut lawful operators who meet their environmental obligations to protect the environment.”

Everyone can play a part in mitigating unlicensed waste activities by reporting any suspicious behaviour to our 24/7 Pollution Hotline on 1300 130 372 and in mitigating illegal dumping by reporting suspicious activity: Litter and Illegal Dumping Online Reporting System.

Checklist to assist insolvency practitioners

Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

How to access the checklist

To assist insolvency practitioners when preparing an indemnity request, we have developed an Indemnity checklist for insolvency practitioners (PDF, 230KB)This link will download a file.

It is important you refer to the online version each time you prepare an indemnity request. This will ensure the information is current.

This checklist is a fillable form that will not load on a mobile device, tablet or within a browser. To complete the form, you must save it to your desktop computer or laptop (with the latest version of Adobe Acrobat installed):

  1. To download, right click on the link and select Save target as (or a similar option depending on your internet browser) to save it to your computer.
  2. Open the form with Adobe Acrobat Reader DC and enable JavaScript, if prompted before filling in the form.
  3. Once you’ve completed your form, save it using the Save and print form button at the end of the form.

Tip: Update your default app for PDF file types to Adobe Acrobat Reader DC to open all PDF files with Adobe Acrobat.

How to use the indemnity checklist

The indemnity checklist comprises Part 1 and Part 2 with a fillable form at Annexure A:

  • All indemnity requests must be in writing and address Part 1.
  • Part 2 will also need to be addressed where the indemnity is being sought to start a litigation action.
  • Annexure A requires a breakdown of the total costs of an indemnity sought on a task-by-task basis, which will provide a total for the indemnity being sought.

The Annexure A document will be incorporated into a Deed of Indemnity in the event that the indemnity is approved.

Terms of the Deed of Indemnity

The terms of the Deed of Indemnity will not only limit the amount of the indemnity to the overall total approved but will also limit the amount that the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (DCT) will indemnify on a task-by-task basis, unless approved otherwise in a Deed of Variation.

The indemnity will specifically exclude payment of certain costs incurred by insolvency practitioners, including such costs relating to:

  • duties a liquidator or trustee are required by relevant legislation to perform
  • preparing and submitting the indemnity request
  • communicating with the DCT’s officials in relation to the request
  • executing the indemnity agreement
  • reporting to the DCT
  • preparing invoices and all tasks associated with invoicing, including forecasting
  • general ongoing administration of the Deed of Indemnity and any variations agreed to.

Costs and expenses should be treated as costs of the liquidation or bankrupt estate and paid in the prescribed order of priorities pursuant to section 556 of the Corporations Act 2001 (in the case of company liquidations) or section 109 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (in the case of bankrupt estates).

For more information see:

Who needs to report under the SERR?

Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

What is an EDP

An electronic distribution platform (EDP):

  • is a service that allows sellers to make supplies available to buyers
  • is delivered via electronic communication (such as a website, internet portal, gateway, application or online store)
  • doesn’t include a carriage service
  • allows sellers to make supplies available to buyers (for example, booking accommodation or a car ride, or renting out a handbag or lawnmower).

An EDP can be, but is not limited to:

  • a website
  • an internet portal
  • a gateway
  • an application
  • an online store
  • an online marketplace.

Platforms are not an EDP if they only provide:

  • carriage services that transmit electronic communications
  • access to payment systems or payment processing services
  • advertising that makes buyers aware of products and links them to a seller’s website
  • an agent for the suppliers – the term ‘agent’ refers to a legal relationship of authority to act as the supplier on a platform
  • channel management software

Reporting under the SERR

If you operate as an EDP you must report certain transactions involving supplies for consideration made through your platform under the Sharing Economy Reporting Regime (SERR).

What activities are covered under SERR?

EDPs may be required to report information about sellers who earn income through the following activities:

  • ride-sourcing and transport – Includes the purchase or hire of transport services such as
    • ride-sourcing
    • taxis
    • boats
    • other modes of transport
  • accommodation and fixed location assets – covers the rental of physical spaces, including
    • short term accommodation (for example,. holiday rentals)
    • office or parking spaces
    • warehouses or storage units
    • other fixed assets
  • hiring of moveable assets – Includes the rental of items that can be moved or transported, such as
    • vehicles (cars, van, trucks)
    • clothing, equipment and tools
  • services – covers services provided by individuals, including
    • trades and labour (for example., electricians, cleaners)
    • delivery or courier (for example, food delivery, on demand parcel or package delivery)
    • health, beauty and wellness services
    • education and classes
    • tour or guide activities
    • digital services (for example, graphic design, content creations, streaming, publishing, podcast)
    • other freelance, contracting or gig work
  • intangible goods – includes the sale of non-physical goods, such as
    • digital products (for example, eBooks, software, virtual items)
    • tips, donations and gratuities
    • online subscriptions or memberships.

This is a sample of activities that may be reportable under the SERR. This list is not exhaustive and may not cover all scenarios. EDP operators should assess their specific business models and transactions to determine their reporting obligations.

Support available

Support is available at sharingeconomyreporting@ato.gov.au to assist EDPs to make an informed decision on whether they are in scope for the SERR.

Example: service reported under the SERR

Amaya has a wedding to attend and wants to hire a dress that she intends to only wear once.

Borrowed Luxe is an online platform that connects customers like Amaya to a lender (seller) that lends (service) a dress for a period of time for a fee.

Borrowed Luxe facilitates the service between the lender and the customer, including facilitating payment via their website.

Borrowed Luxe is required to report under the SERR because it is an EDP (online service) that facilitates the supply (dress hire) to customers.

End of example

Example: service not reported under the SERR

Michelle needs a plumber to fix her kitchen sink. She uses a website called Fix It where she can request quotes for plumbing services.

Jim, a plumber, contacts Michelle and quotes a price, which Michelle accepts.

Fix It is not operating an EDP as its website only allows individuals to find a service provider. Transactions between the buyer and the seller are not accepted through the website, and the details of the service being provided are agreed to outside the platform.

The supply Jim makes to Michelle is not:

made through an EDP

reported under the SERR.

End of example

Instances of multiple EDPs

There may be instances where a supply is made through multiple EDPs.

Where a supply is made through multiple EDPs, the operator of an EDP (the first platform) is not required to report details about the transaction if:

  • the supply is also made through at least one other EDP
  • the first platform doesn’t provide payment directly to the supplier
  • another EDP operator provides all or part of the payment to the supplier and has a reporting obligation under the SERR for that transaction
  • the operator of the first platform notifies us in writing on or before the due date for the reporting period in which the supply was reportable.

If you are unsure whether the operator of another EDP has a reporting obligation, you need to seek confirmation from them before you apply this exemption. If you can’t get confirmation that another platform has a reporting obligation, you shouldn’t rely on this exemption.

EDP obliged to report or exempt

This principle places the obligation to report on the EDP that is closest to the seller or supplier. It reduces the likelihood that the same transaction will be reported to the Commissioner of Taxation by more than one EDP operator. It places the obligation to report the transaction on EDPs that provide all or part of the consideration they receive in relation to the supply directly to the supplier.

If an EDP operator intends to apply this exemption to supplies made through its EDP and another EDP, you must notify the Commissioner in writing that you will be relying on the exemption and not reporting those transactions.

Example: first platform operator in a multiple platform arrangement

Using the Short Stay Marketplace Co EDP, Ezra books a 3-night stay at a property owned by Nina in Melbourne for $450.

To book the accommodation, Short Stay Marketplace Co’s EDP transacts and makes the booking through another EDP, Melbourne Vacations. Short Stay Marketplace Co pays Melbourne Vacations for the bookings, which then pays Nina.

In this case, Short Stay Marketplace Co is the first platform operator and doesn’t pay the supplier directly. Short Stay Marketplace Co confirms with Melbourne Vacations that it has a reporting obligation in relation to the supply of accommodation by Nina and pays Nina.

Short Stay Marketplace Co may elect to rely on the exemption and not report the supply. If it does so, it must notify the Commissioner it is relying on this exemption before the due date for the reporting period in which the supply is reportable.

End of example

What is the SERR?

Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

Background of the SERR

The Sharing Economy Reporting Regime (SERR) is a third-party reporting regime that requires operators of electronic distribution platforms (EDPs) to report on supplies made through the platform to the ATO. Its purpose is to:

  • create a level playing field across industries
  • provide transparency of the income a seller makes from their activities in the sharing economy.

Subdivision 396-B creates a new third-party reporting regime in Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953. This regime requires entities to report information to the Commissioner of Taxation about transactions that could reasonably be expected to have tax consequences for other entities where those entities are connected with Australia.

The SERR requires EDP operators to report certain identity and income information on eligible transactions made through the platform to the ATO.

Reporting dates

EDP operators must report transactions made through their platform twice a year:

  • 1 July to 31 December – report must be submitted by 31 January of the following year
  • 1 January to 30 June – report must be submitted by 31 July of that year.

From 1 July 2023 SERR reporting started for EDPs supplying:

  • taxi services, including ride-sourcing
  • short-term accommodation.

From 1 July 2024, reporting expanded to include all other reportable transactions under SERR.

Refer to Reporting under SERR to view a sample list of activities that may be reportable under this regime.

Why we collect this information

The information collected under the SERR will allow us to:

  • increase community confidence in the integrity of the tax and super systems
  • identify and educate participants who fail to meet their registration or lodgment obligations and help them comply
  • gain insights from the data to help us develop and implement engagement strategies to improve voluntary compliance – including educational or compliance activities
  • obtain intelligence to increase our understanding of behaviours and compliance profiles of participants in the sharing economy.

Transactions reportable under the SERR

Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

Types of supply that must be reported

A supply is made through an EDP if payment and any related discussions, negotiations or other activities are carried out on the platform. For example, if the EDP has a ‘click to chat’ option or call centre that a buyer uses to make enquiries before purchasing via an online checkout, the supply will still be made through the EDP.

EDP operators must report transactions related to the supply of:

EDP operators don’t need to report details of all supplies made through their EDP. Transactions for supplies that don’t need to be reported include:

  • where an amount of the payment for the supply must be withheld under Division 12 in Schedule 1 to the Tax Administration Act 1953, for example, for salary and wages
  • where the operator and seller are members of the same tax consolidated or multiple entry consolidated group
  • sale of goods – the transfer of the title or ownership of goods or real property
  • financial supplies, such as financial securities trading
  • the sale of vouchers, such as a gift cards, with a specified monetary value that can be redeemed for goods or services
  • supplies where the EDP operator is also the supplier (that is, the supplier is not a third party)
  • those completed, including payment being made to the supplier, before the SERR started for that type of supply.

For more information, see Law Companion Ruling LCR 2018/2 GST on supplies made through electronic distribution platforms (paragraphs 19 to 47).

Example: a booking service only

Erica uses Taxi Booking Co’s mobile application to book a taxi. To make the booking, Erica provides:

  • her name
  • the address that she wants to be picked up from
  • the date and time at which the taxi is to pick her up.

Erica doesn’t input any information about her intended destination. Taxi Booking Co arranges for a taxi driver to collect Erica. Payment for the fare is not made through the app and must be made directly to the taxi driver at the end of the trip.

Taxi Booking Co has no way of knowing whether the taxi driver ever actually made the supply of taxi travel or what the value of service would have been and is not required to report this transaction under the SERR.

End of example

Example: tips and gratuities

Lauren is a content creator. Fans of Lauren can pay a fee to Lauren through the Content4Fans platform to access exclusive content which is delivered through the platform.

Some fans also make an additional voluntary payment through that platform to thank Lauren for the content (that is, tips or gratuities). This may be in the form of either money or a digital token that Lauren can redeem for money or other goods or services.

Because the voluntary payments (tips) are given in connection with a supply made through the Content4Fans platform, the operator of Content4Fans needs to include the amount of these tips paid to Lauren in its report in addition to the fee paid to Lauren for access to the content.

End of example

Supplies that are connected with Australia

Only supplies connected with Australia are reportable under the SERR. A supply is connected with Australia if the:

  • service or digital good is provided to an end user in Australia
  • seller makes the sale through a business they carry on in Australia
  • sale is of a right or option to purchase something that would be connected with Australia
  • supply is of real property, such as a supply of short-term accommodation, located in Australia
  • the residency of the supplier doesn’t affect whether the supply is connected with Australia – the supplier doesn’t have to be in Australia for their supplies to be connected with Australia.

Examples of supplies that are connected with Australia include:

  • hiring an asset that is located in Australia, such as a car
  • providing accommodation that is located in Australia, but not accommodation located outside Australia
  • food delivery service in Australia
  • a podcast recorded by a person with an address within Australia.

For more information, see Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2019/1 Goods and services tax: supply of anything other than goods or real property connected with the indirect tax zone (Australia).

Peking Duk and The Living End to headline at Summernats

Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

Canberra duo Peking Duk will take the Summernats entertainment to a new level.

In brief:

  • Street Machine Summernats 38 will be held in January 2026.
  • The event’s entertainment program is led by bands Peking Duk and The Living End.
  • This article outlines some of what ticketholders can expect.

Peking Duk and The Living End will headline at Street Machine Summernats 38.

The award-winning bands lead a stacked entertainment program, which will rock EPIC between 8 and 11 January 2026.

It’s the biggest entertainment lineup in Summernats history. Read on to see some of what’s in store.

Peking Duk – Saturday night

Party starters Peking Duk will hit the main stage with bangers like High and Take Me Over.

The hometown favourites have graced some of the world’s biggest stages.

Now they’re bringing it home to cement Summernats’ iconic festival atmosphere.

The Living End – Friday night

The Living End will ignite the stage with breakneck riffs, pounding rhythms and anthems like Prisoner of Society and White Noise.

Their explosive energy has seen them tear up arenas and festivals for more than 20 years. Summernats 38 will be no exception.

The Screaming Jets – Friday night

Pub rock icons The Screaming Jets are known for classics such as Better and Helping Hand.

They’re sure to deliver the grit and sweat that have defined them for over 30 years.

Killing Heidi – Friday night

Killing Heidi will bring nostalgia and energy with hook-laden anthems like Mascara and Weir.

Their set will leave no doubt why they’re still one of Australia’s most-loved live acts.

Across the weekend, DJ and remix artist Chunky Dip will keep the crowds dancing late into the night.

2026 major event upgrades

Alongside Summernats’ biggest entertainment lineup there will be major upgrades. These include:

  • Double Skid Row: dual lanes for more tyre-frying chaos
  • pedestrian overpasses: faster, easier access to all the best spots
  • non-stop entertainment: Hot Wheels stunts, FMX High Air, carnival rides and air shows
  • expanded park-up zones: more space for entrants to showcase their cars
  • improved spectator areas: additional grandstands, shade and chill zones.

The Summernats experience

Summernats is four days of intense auto action. It features:

  • Australia’s top street machine competition
  • the world’s largest burnout competition
  • horsepower heroics
  • cruising
  • a massive automotive retail trade show.

The annual event brings major economic benefits to the ACT.

In 2025, it attracted over 47,500 visitors from across Australia and overseas.

Beyond the cars, Summernats is about community, fun and the party. And, of course, the music.

Find more about Street Machine Summernats 38 on the Summernats website.

Read more like this:


Get ACT news and events delivered straight to your inbox, sign up to our email newsletter:


Serious crash at Mount Schank

Source: New South Wales – News

Police and emergency services are responding to a serious crash at Mount Schank.

About 6.30pm Wednesday 27 August, police and emergency services were called to Glenelg River Road, 10km south of Mount Gambier, following reports of a two-car crash.

Glenelg River Road is closed between Whitehead Road and Laslett Road.

Please avoid the area.