$10 million investment to give Dapto a southern ramp up

Source: Workplace Gender Equality Agency

The Albanese Government is making it easier to travel across the Illawarra with a $10 million investment to plan Dapto’s new south-facing ramps, matching a $10 million investment from the Minns Labor Government.

The announcement follows an initial consultation period, conducted by the NSW Government, which received over 4,000 ideas and suggestions from the local community, all of which will inform next steps of the planning process.

The jointly-funded planning work will explore south-facing ramps onto the M1 Princes Motorway from Emerson Road, or from Fowlers or Kanahooka Roads which have existing north-facing ramps.

The project will deliver better connections between suburbs to the south such as Shellharbour and Kiama to suburbs like Dapto, Horsley and Brownsville.

The north facing on and off-ramps at Fowlers and Kanahooka roads currently limit Princes Motorway access to residents travelling to or from the north, forcing commuters travelling to or from south of Dapto to detour via the Princes Highway.

This leads to inflated travel times and distances for Illawarra motorists, particularly during morning, evening and weekend peak periods.

The population of the Illawarra-Shoalhaven is expected to grow by around 100,000 extra people by 2041. As the population continues to grow and travel habits change, the southern ramps will simplify travel options across the region.

Quotes attributable to Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government Minister Catherine King:

“With the population of the southern Illawarra booming, it’s vital that our investment in essential infrastructure keeps up.

“These southern ramps are a simple intervention, but one that will have an incredibly positive impact on the way people travel around this region.

“Work is already underway with the NSW Government completing initial consultation and planning. This additional investment will assist with detailed planning and progressing the project so we can get shovels in the ground sooner.”

Quotes attributable to NSW Minister for Roads John Graham:

“The community has spoken, they want these ramps. Now that $20 million has been committed from State and Federal Government, the detailed work can be done to ensure south-facing ramps go from being a good idea, to an every day reality.”

Quotes attributable to Member for Whitlam Stephen Jones:

“The madness of the north-only ramps means my constituents have to double back and forth between the highway and motorway to cover simple trips. Dapto’s north-only ramps have been a headache for locals for too long. This funding means we can finally get on with the job.

“As new developments spring up in West Dapto, it’s vital we get these ramps up and running so people aren’t caught in endless traffic jams. These south-facing ramps will give people a direct route and ease the bottlenecks on our roads.”

Quotes attributable to NSW Member for Shellharbour Anna Watson:

“2023 was the year of commitment, where our community made the case for this investment. 2024 was the year of consultation, where Transport for NSW heard directly from residents and motorists what they want to see from this project.

With this additional funding from the Federal Government, 2025 can be the year of detailed planning and development, as we get closer to starting work on this vital project.

Unregistered builder convicted

Source: Australian Capital Territory Policing

Unregistered builder Mark (Najy) Rayes has been convicted and fined for taking more than $100,000 in payments from customers for services he did not provide.

Rayes, 47, was running an unregistered building and landscaping business when he committed the offences, between 2021 and 2023.

Consumer Affairs Victoria (CAV) investigated Rayes after receiving customer complaints. He was convicted and fined $15,000 for offences under the Australian Consumer Law and $1,000 for breaches of the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995.

People are reminded that when hiring someone to do a renovation, extension, repairs or other building work worth more than $10,000, the contractor must be registered as a building practitioner and provide a written contract.

Registered builders are subject to professional standards, which means consumers are more likely to end up with a job they are happy with.

Hiring someone who isn’t registered risks hiring someone who isn’t skilled and consequently, consumers may end up with poor quality work, as well as limited recourse if the builder walks away.

Jobs worth more than $16,000 must also be covered by domestic building insurance, which protects consumers if the builder dies, disappears or is declared insolvent. For this work, builders must provide:

  • a copy of the domestic building insurance policy, and
  • a certificate of currency covering the property.

CAV Director Nicole Rich is urging people who are renovating or getting building work done to make sure they are covered.

“For more complex jobs, it’s essential to make sure you only hire practitioners with the right cover and qualifications,” she said.

“The law is there to protect you. Doing your due diligence can help ensure the build or reno is completed to the standard you want and expect.”

Find a registered builder on the Victorian Building Authority website.

For more about planning a renovation or build, including what to do if things go wrong, go to our Building and renovating information.

Court Services Victoria – Family Violence Intervention Orders

Source: FairTrading New South Wales

On 15 November 2024, Court Services Victoria (CSV) implemented requested changes to the wording of Magistrates’ Court and Children’s Court family violence intervention orders (FVIOs).  

A coding error was made as part of those changes to a legacy system, leading to a line in the orders being omitted when printed.  

CSV was notified about the error on 4 March 2025 and took immediate steps to rectify it.

All copies of family violence intervention orders printed from 6 March 2025 no longer omit the relevant line.  

A full post-incident review is underway.

CSV acknowledges and apologises for the error. The safety of all affected family members was CSV’s priority as we remedied the issue.

Affected family members or respondents can call the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria’s Service Centre on 03 9087 6116 between 9am and 7pm Monday to Friday.  

Contact: feedback@courts.vic.gov.au

The Australian labour market continues to ease

Source: Jobs and Skills Australia

The Australian labour market continues to ease

Vasilisa


News and updates
SALM reveals the number of SA2s with an unemployment rate of less than 5% decreased over the year to the June quarter 2024.

WILKIN ROAD, MURRAY BRIDGE NORTH (Grass Fire)

Source: South Australia County Fire Service

MURRAY BRIDGE NORTH

Haystack fire Wilkin Road Murray Bridge North

Issued for MURRAY BRIDGE NORTH near Murray Bridge in the Murraylands.

The CFS is currently responding to a haystack fire on Wilkin Road, Murray Bridge North. Machinery is being used to dismantle the haystack to help extinguish the fire. This process may generate smoke, which could be visible from Mannum Road. .

Message ID 0008406

Key regulatory changes for the telecommunications sector: new SoCI rules incoming, and Telco Bill introduced into Parliament

Source: Allens Insights (legal sector)

Over the past few months, the Government has introduced a number of important reforms to the Australian telecommunications regulatory landscape. These reforms will have a significant impact on all carriers and many carriage service providers. Taken together with the current Telecommunications Consumer Protections (TCP) Code amendment process, they constitute a significant uplift in regulatory obligations applicable to the sector.

The legislative reforms comprise:

  • Amendments to the Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2024 (Cth) (SoCI Act), which transfer and uplift certain obligations that apply to telecommunications providers under the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) (Telco Act) and take effect on 4 April 2025.
  • Rules that ‘switch on’ the obligation for carriers and certain carriage service providers (CSPs) to implement and maintain a Telecommunications Security and Risk Management Program (TSRMP Rules)1 have been made and will commence on 4 April 2025.
  • The Security of Critical Infrastructure Amendment (2025 Measures No. 1) Rules 2025 (Cth) (Amended Application Rules) which amend the Security of Critical Infrastructure (Application) Rules (LIN 22/026) 2022 (Cth) (Application Rules) have been made. Once these amendments take effect on 4 April 2025, they will have the effect of switching on the Asset Registration and Cyber Security Incident Notification Rules under the SoCI Act. 
  • On 12 February 2025, the Telecommunications Amendment (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2025 (Enhancing Consumer Safeguards Bill) was also introduced into Parliament but has not yet been passed. If passed, this Bill would have the effect of:
    • establishing a requirement for eligible CSPs to be registered as a condition of being permitted to supply services;
    • enabling the direct enforcement of industry codes by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA); and
    • amending and increasing the penalty amounts for infringement notices and civil penalties.

Key takeaways

Security regulation for critical telecommunications assets

Who will be captured?

All carriers and a subset of CSPs will be subject to all three positive security obligations under the SoCI Act with resect to critical telecommunications assets (as opposed to being subject to parallel obligations which are currently enlivened pursuant to the Telecommunications (Carrier Licence Conditions—Security Information) Declaration 2022 (Cth) and the Telecommunications (Carriage Service Provider—Security Information) Determination 2022 (Cth) (the Telco Security Information Instruments) with respect to asset registration and incident notification).

The subset of CSPs to be caught under these new rules (‘relevant carriage service provider asset’) are:

  • CSPs that meet the prescribed threshold of 20,000 active carriage services; and
  • CSPs that supply to the Government (except for bodies established by a law of the Government).

What will be captured?

The definition of Critical Telecommunication Asset has been expanded to include:

‘(b) any other asset that is:

(i) owned or operated by a carrier or a carriage service provider; and
(ii) used in connection with the supply of a carriage service’ (emphasis added)

Consistent with reforms to the SoCI Act implemented in December 2024, the effect of this amendment is to ensure that assets owned and operated by carriers/CSPs which are used in connection with the supply of a service (rather than used directly in the supply a service) are captured under the SoCI Act. This would include, for example, CRM systems and corporate IT networks that were not previously clearly captured.

Positive security obligations

  CARRIER ASSETS  ‘RELEVANT CSP’ ASSETS OTHER CSP ASSETS
Risk Management Program obligations

Obligation to protect asset3

Notification of changes4

Asset Registration obligation

Mandatory Cyber Incident Reporting

Government assistance, directions and information-gathering powers

The TSRMP Rules largely mirror the existing Security of Critical Infrastructure (Critical infrastructure risk management program) Rules (LIN 23/006) 2023 (Cth) with additions to reflect telecommunications-specific risks, including risks relating to the compromise, theft or manipulation of communications.

Some key points in the draft TSRMP Rules stand out in particular:

  • Carriers and Relevant CSPs will have until 3 October 2025 (ie, six months from 4 April 2025) to develop and implement their risk management program to address the following hazard vectors:
    • cyber and information security hazards
    • personnel hazards
    • supply chain hazards
    • physical security hazards and natural hazards.
  • With respect to cyber and information security hazards, the requirement to meet minimum cybersecurity maturity frameworks goes beyond that currently provided for under the existing CIRMP Rules for other asset classes. For both carriers and Relevant CSPs, maturity indicator 1 for the prescribed framework must be achieved by 3 October 2026. However for carriers only, maturity indicator 2 with respect to one of the following frameworks must be achieved by 3 October 2027:
    • Essential Eight;
    • Cybersecurity Capability Maturity Model (published by the US Department of Energy); or
    • 2020‑21 AESCSF Framework Core published by Australian Energy Market Operator Limited.
  • We understand that the obligation to achieve maturity indicator 2 is something that smaller carriers (unsuccessfully) tried to resist during the consultation process owing to the fact that it would result in an increase in their operating costs. However, the Government is of the view that, given the criticality of telecommunications networks to the economy, the higher maturity indicator is necessary. It is not a stretch to imagine that the obligation to achieve maturity indicator 2 might be imposed on other classes of critical infrastructure assets in the near future.
  • The TSRMP Rules will relate to all assets owned or operated by carriers and Relevant CSPs. This is materially broader than the existing concept of a ‘critical telecommunications asset’ which relates to those assets owned by a carrier/CSP and used to provide a carriage service. The effect of this is that the TSRMP must address both assets relating to a carriers/CSPs telecommunications network as well as those assets which do not (e.g. billing and charging systems).
  • Carriers and Relevant CSPs will need to provide an annual attestation in relation to their compliance with their risk management program.

The Amended Application Rules will transfer the existing registration obligations for carriers and CSPs, which are currently applicable by virtue of the Telco Security Information Instruments, to the SoCI Act. As per the above table, the obligation to provide ownership, operation, interest and control information to the Register of Critical Infrastructure Assets will apply to carriers and Relevant CSPs.

We understand that the existing equivalent obligations made under the Telco Security Information Instruments will continue to be in effect until 7 July 2025.

The reforms to the SoCI Act also transfer elements of the TSSR currently contained in Part 14 of the Telco Act into a new Part 2D of the SoCI Act.

  • Obligation to protect asset: the current obligation in section 313(1A) of the Telco Act requires carriers and CSPs to ‘do their best’ to protect their telecommunications networks and facilities from unauthorised interference or unauthorised access. The new section 30EB of the SoCI Act requires the responsible entity for a critical telecommunications asset prescribed by the rules to protect the asset, ‘so far as it is reasonably practicable to do so’ for the purposes of: (a) security; and (b) the protection of the asset from any hazard where there is a material risk that the occurrence of the hazard could have a relevant impact on the asset. This obligation will apply with respect to all critical telecommunications assets.
  • Notification of changes: all carriers will be required to notify the Secretary of certain changes, and proposed changes, to telecommunications services or telecommunications systems if the change, or proposed change, is likely to have a material adverse effect on the entity’s capacity to comply with the obligation to protect the asset for the purposes of security. The kinds of changes to be notified mirror those currently specified in section 314A(2) of the Telco Act. The TSRMP Rules (rule 17) prescribe a list of information that carriers must provide to the Secretary when notifying them of such a change or proposed change. In large part, this has the effect of codifying much of the information that was previously required to be provided under the CISC’s sample notification form.
  • Compliance with Minister’s directions to cease supply: the new section 30EF of the SoCI Act largely replicates the existing section 315A of the Telco Act, which enables the Minister for Home Affairs to issue a direction requiring a carrier or carriage service provider ‘not to use or supply, or to cease using or supplying’ a particular service that the Minister considers to be ‘prejudicial to security’. This obligation applies generally to responsible entities of a critical telecommunications asset and does not rely upon any rules prescribing the application of this section.

Other TSSR components that would be repealed from the existing Telco Act, including other direction-making powers of the Minister for Home Affairs, the Secretary of Home Affairs’ information gathering powers and requirements in relation to security capability plans are not proposed to be replicated into the SoCI Act.

However, the existing SoCI Act’s direction-making, information-gathering powers are broadly equivalent to these provisions.

New CSP registration requirements and enforcement powers for telco regulator

The Enhancing Consumer Safeguards Bill has been introduced by the Government to improve compliance and enforcement of telecommunications consumer protection rules for the benefit of consumers.6

These proposed reforms coincide with a review by the ACMA of the TCP Code and a draft revised version that has been the subject of public consultation (and much debate).

Registration of CSPs

Currently, there is no licensing or other registration framework that applies to CSPs under the Telco Act (unlike carriers, that must register a carrier licence with the ACMA).

The Enhancing Consumer Safeguards Bill proposes to establish a CSP registration scheme prohibiting:

  • CSPs from providing a listed carriage service to the public unless it is registered; and
  • carriers or wholesale CSPs from supplying listed carriage services to CSPs that are not registered.

The CSP registration scheme is proposed to apply to ‘eligible carriage service providers’, being CSPs that enter into the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman (TIO) scheme and supply:

  • a standard telephone service;
  • public mobile telecommunications service; or
  • a carriage service that enables end-users to access the internet.7

ACMA will also have the power to:

  • impose conditions on the registration of CSPs;
  • refuse a CSP’s registration based on prescribed grounds for refusal (eg the application contains false or misleading material, the applicant has engaged in or is likely to engage in a contravention of the TIO scheme, or the applicant has engaged in conduct that poses a significant risk to consumers); and
  • revoke the registration of a registered CSP.

Mandatory industry codes

The ACMA does not currently have the power to directly enforce industry codes rather, it must first direct a provider to comply with the code or issue a formal warning.8 The ACMA can currently only take stronger enforcement action if the provider continues to not comply with its directions or warnings.

The Enhancing Consumer Safeguards Bill proposes to make compliance with an industry code mandatory and to make breaches of the obligation to comply with registered industry code a civil penalty provision that is directly enforceable by the ACMA at first instance.

Pecuniary penalties

Currently, maximum civil penalties differ greatly across the Telco Act and the current maximum civil penalty for non-compliance with a direction by the ACMA to comply with a registered industry code is $250,000.9

The Enhancing Consumer Safeguards Bill proposes to increase maximum penalties that can be ordered by the court for individual contraventions to the greater of:

  • 30,300 penalty units (~$9.999 million);
  • three times the benefit obtained by the relevant entity and its related bodies corporate from the contravening conduct; or
  • if the court cannot determine the benefit, 30% of the adjusted turnover of the body corporate during the breach turnover period for the contravention.

Infringement notices given to bodies corporate

Currently the Telco Act only permits the Minister for Communications to increase infringement notice penalties for breaches of either the general carrier licence conditions or CSP rules.

The proposed amendments to the Telco Act will allow the Minister for Communications to increase infringement notice penalty amounts for any breach where the ACMA can already issue an infringement notice.

What’s next?

Organisations in the telecommunications sector should consider the steps required to ensure compliance with the latest reforms. This might include:

Advice under development

Source:

We develop public advice and guidance to help super funds understand and meet their reporting and legislative obligations.

Our Advice under development – super issues page provides details of advice and guidance products under development for key superannuation issues. It outlines the specifics, purpose, expected completion dates, and contact points for each piece of guidance currently under consideration.

If you’re waiting for updates on a draft law practice statement, an addendum to a ruling, or other guidance, check this page for updates.

We encourage you to regularly review this resource to help you stay informed.

Looking for the latest news for Super funds? You can stay up to date by visiting our Super funds newsroom and subscribingExternal Link to our monthly Super funds newsletter and CRT alerts.

Open forums

Source:

What open forums offer

Open forums are interactive webinars with guest speakers from the ATO and the Tax Practitioners Board.

These webinars give you and your staff an opportunity to:

  • hear about the latest updates and upcoming changes to the tax, super and registry systems
  • ask questions.

Your attendance may contribute towards your continuing professional educationExternal Link (CPE) with the Tax Practitioners Board.

Upcoming open forums

You can register for one of our open forums using the ‘Register for this session’ link in the following table.

Details of open forums

Open forum sessions

Session topics

An update from the ATO

Wednesday 9 April 2025

2:00 pm to 3:30 pm AEST

Register for this sessionExternal Link

Helping small businesses

  • Quarterly updates on key focus areas.
  • Moving from quarterly to monthly reporting.
  • Boosting tax incentives.
  • Taxable Payments Reporting System (TPRS).
  • Online learning resources and support.

Cyber security

  • ATO impersonation scams
    • Including scam case studies and advice.
  • Cyber safety
    • Including advice on enhancing your cyber hygiene.

Improving lodgment performance, part 2 of 3 – why a lodgment deferral request may not be granted

  • What are unforeseen or exceptional circumstances?
  • Information to include in your lodgment deferral request.
  • Why a lodgment deferral may not be the best option.

An update from the ATO

Thursday 8 May 2025 

11.30 am to 1:00 pm AEST

Register for this sessionExternal Link

eInvoicing

  • eInvoicing developments in Australia.
  • The rising popularity of eInvoicing.
  • eInvoicing and the Federal Budget.
  • Peppol around the world.
  • What is eInvoicing?
  • Benefits of eInvoicing.
  • How eInvoicing helps you and your clients.

Improving lodgment performance, part 3 of 3 – are you requesting deferrals to support your practice?

  • When lodgment deferrals may not be the best option.
  • Why we are looking at what’s being requested across the profession.
  • What this means for you.

NFP (not-for-profit) self-review return

  • What is the NFP self-review?
  • Who needs to lodge and when.
  • NFP governing documents requirement.

31 March lodgment deadline approaches for over 100,000 not-for-profits

Source:

Commencing for the 2023–24 income year, more than 100,000 non-charitable not-for-profits (NFPs) with an active Australian business number (ABN) are now required to lodge an annual self-review return to notify of their eligibility to self-assess as income tax exempt.

The new reporting requirement was introduced in the 2021–22 Federal Budget to enhance transparency and integrity in the tax, super and registry system by ensuring only eligible non-charitable NFPs access that income tax exemption. The law hasn’t changed but the reporting of eligibility has.

The ATO has extended the due date for the 2023–24 income year self-review return until 31 March 2025, to help NFPs lodge their first return. Future self-review returns will be due by 31 October annually.

Charitable NFPs registered with the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) are not required to lodge the self-review return.

ATO Assistant Commissioner Jennifer Moltisanti encouraged NFPs to act now, review their affairs and lodge their first self-review return.

‘With the 31 March deadline fast approaching, it is important that all NFPs who are required to lodge the 2023–24 income year self-review return do so in time. NFPs must meet this requirement to continue self-assessing as income tax exempt,’ Ms Moltisanti advised.

‘Thousands of NFPs have already lodged their first return. It doesn’t take much time to complete the return and lodge’.

‘We know the NFP population is made up of diverse groups that include community service organisations and sporting clubs right across Australia.’

‘It is important all NFPs are aware of their obligations and don’t delay lodging their first return. We will support NFPs that are genuinely trying to do the right thing, however, we will review those who intentionally ignore their obligations.’

‘If you don’t understand the new reporting requirements, we encourage you to act early and ask for help – from the ATO or your registered tax professional,’ Ms Moltisanti said.

Some NFPs, when completing their self-assessment, may realise that they instead need to register with the ACNC as a charitable NFP to access the income tax exemption. Others may come to the conclusion that they have incorrectly assumed that they were entitled to a tax exemption.

‘If you’ve mistakenly assessed as income tax exempt in the past it is important you don’t worry. You can contact our dedicated team and we can help you work it out.’

‘Similarly, if you realise that your organisation should instead be registered with the ACNC as a charitable NFP, you can still lodge the NFP self-review return and we will help you with the next steps,’ Ms Moltisanti said.

The ATO has developed the NFP self-review return flowchart to provide a step-by-step guide on how to access and lodge the return online through Online services for business. NFPs can also phone the ATO’s self-help phone service on 13 72 26 to lodge by phone or use their registered tax agent.

The return only asks for information that NFPs should already know:

  • section 1: organisational details. Prior to lodging we recommend checking that ABN contact details are up to date
  • section 2: the NFP category that best reflects the main purpose of the organisation and therefore which category the NFP is claiming the income tax exemption against
  • section 3: summary and declaration.

NFPs can also phone the ATO’s dedicated NFP Advice Service on 1300 130 248 if they require further assistance.

‘We are committed to supporting NFPs and helping them to meet their obligations.’

The ATO continues to ensure NFPs have the support and information they need to lodge. For more information visit ato.gov.au/NFPtaxexempt.

Notes to journalists

Renewal of Bilateral Local Currency Swap Agreement with Bank of Japan

Source: Airservices Australia

The Reserve Bank of Australia and Bank of Japan have renewed the Bilateral Local Currency Swap Agreement for a further three years.

The initial swap agreement between the two central banks was signed in 2016 and has been renewed for three-year periods since that time. Each agreement is designed to enhance the financial stability of the two countries, and allows for the exchange of local currencies between the two central banks of up to A$20 billion or JPY 1.6 trillion.