Four people charged after North West police seize significant quantity of ice during three separate searches

Source: New South Wales Community and Justice

Four people charged after North West police seize significant quantity of ice during three separate searches

Friday, 16 May 2025 – 10:40 am.

Police have charged four people following three separate searches in the North West this week, with officers seizing more than 3.5 kilograms of ice with a potential to cause significant harm to the Tasmanian community.
The ice seized could have resulted in more than 35,000 individual street deals.
A woman was charged with major trafficking after police seized 3.39 kilograms of methylamphetamine (ice) and a significant quantity of GHB during a routine screening at the Spirit of Tasmania terminal on Wednesday afternoon.
Western Drug and Firearms Unit along with Western CIB and a Tasmania Police Drug detection dog conducted a search of a vehicle at the terminal locating and seizing the ice, along with 5 litres of GHB.
A 27-year-old Bracknell woman has since been charged with trafficking (major offence), importation of a controlled drug, dealing with property suspected to be proceeds of crime and other minor drug offences.
She was detained to appear in the Devonport Magistrates Court yesterday.

In an unrelated incident, two people have also been charged with trafficking after police seized 63 grams of methylamphetamine during an alleged evade earlier this week.
Members of Taskforce Scelus attempted to intercept the vehicle during routine patrols at West Ulverstone on Tuesday afternoon, when the driver allegedly evaded officers.
Road spikes were successfully deployed and the driver and passenger – a 29-year-old West Ulverstone man and 24-year-old Newnham woman – were safely taken into custody.
During a subsequent search of the vehicle, police located and seized 63 grams of methylamphetamine, and more than $3000 in cash believed to be proceeds of crime.
Both the driver and passenger were jointly charged with trafficking and minor drug offences.
The man was also charged with evade police (aggravated circumstances), and multiple driving-related offences including unlicensed driving.
They were both remanded in custody with the male to appear at the Burnie Magistrates Court on Friday 16 May and the female to appear at the Burnie Magistrates Court on 4 June.

A third unrelated search at a Devonport residence yesterday morning resulted in a 51-year-old North West man and member of the Outlaws motorcycle gang being charged with multiple drug-related offences including selling a controlled drug.
During the search police located a quantity of methylamphetamine.
The man will be proceeded against for selling a controlled drug, possession of a controlled drug and use of a controlled drug.
He will appear in Devonport Magistrates Court at a later date.
Detective Inspector Michelle Elmer said the drugs seized during both incidents are highly addictive and have the potential to cause significant harm to the community.
“While the incidents were unrelated, the methylamphetamine seized by our officers in the North West in the past few days could have resulted in more than 35,000 individual street deals,” she said.
Western District Acting Commander Nathan Johnston said this week’s seizures sent a clear message to criminals – you will be targeted.
“Tasmania Police will continue to target offenders who attempt to import illicit substances into Tasmania by conducting both targeted and random screening of persons entering the state by sea and airports,” he said.
“Stopping these drugs before they reach our streets has prevented further harm to the Tasmanian community.”
Anyone with information about illicit substances is urged to contact police on 131 444 or Crime Stoppers anonymously on 1800 333 000 or online at crimestopperstas.com.au

Regional employment at strongest levels in a decade

Source: Jobs and Skills Australia

Regional employment at strongest levels in a decade

Ebony


News and updates
The March 2025 Regional Labour Market Indicator (RLMI) presents the latest results on labour market performance across Australia’s regions.

Global and domestic minimum tax

Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

Pillar Two implementation in Australia

Australia has implemented the Global Anti-Base Erosion Model RulesExternal Link (GloBE Rules) by introducing a global and domestic minimum tax.

The GloBE Rules provide for a coordinated system of taxation intended to ensure multinational enterprise groups (MNE groups) are subject to a global minimum tax rate of 15% in each of the jurisdictions where they operate. They are a key part of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/G20 Two-Pillar SolutionExternal Link, to address the tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy.

On 10 December 2024, primary legislation that implements the framework of the GloBE Rules in Australia received royal assent. The primary legislation also makes consequential amendments. These amendments include provisions necessary for the administration of top-up tax within the existing tax administration framework, consistent with the GloBE Rules.

On 23 December 2024, subordinate legislation containing the detailed computational rules was registered as a legislative instrument. This means the subordinate legislation is now in force, noting it is subject to the standard parliamentary process for legislative instruments, including a disallowance period.

The global and domestic minimum tax comprises of:

  • a global minimum tax which consists of 2 interlocking rules
    • the Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) – acts as the primary rule which broadly allows Australia to apply a top-up tax on multinational parent entities located in Australia if the group’s effective tax rate in another jurisdiction is below 15%
    • the Undertaxed Profits Rule (UTPR) – acts as a backstop rule which allows Australia to apply a top-up tax on constituent entities located in Australia if the group’s effective tax rate in another jurisdiction is below 15% and where the profit is not brought into charge under an IIR
  • a domestic minimum tax, which operates consistently with the GloBE Rules and provides Australia the ability to claim primary rights to impose top-up tax over any low-taxed profits in Australia, in priority over the IIR and UTPR.

The IIR and the domestic minimum tax will apply to fiscal years starting on or after 1 January 2024. The UTPR will apply to fiscal years starting on or after 1 January 2025.

The primary legislation can be found here:

The subordinate legislation can be found here:

ATO guidance

We are currently considering the need for guidance products to support the new measure, along with whether there is a need to update existing guidance. See Advice under development – international issues for more information.

As part of ongoing ATO consultation, we have been seeking feedback on guidance that will most usefully support implementation of the new measure. We will continue to seek feedback as Australia’s implementation of Pillar Two progresses.

You can also contact us if you have any feedback on priority issues for public advice and guidance.

Administering potential amendments

The Australian global and domestic minimum tax must be applied consistently with the GloBE RulesExternal Link for Australia to achieve qualification status. This requires maintaining consistent outcomes set out in specific OECD materials, including future publications and how and in what timeframe a jurisdiction addresses identified inconsistencies with its law. These OECD materials are the GloBE Model Rules, Commentary, and agreed Administrative Guidance.

An inconsistency may arise when Australia has yet to implement agreed Administrative Guidance or there has been a minor drafting oversight in the Australian law compared to OECD materials. Any potential amendment to Australian law to address inconsistencies remains a policy decision as a matter for the government and future governments.

As explained in the Explanatory MemorandumExternal Link, the primary legislation includes a rule making power so that future OECD materials can be incorporated efficiently and in a timely manner. This can apply retrospectively to maintain Australia’s qualification.

While any decision regarding amendments is a matter for government, we expect future amendments to address inconsistencies may generally have retrospective application where relevant to maintain qualification.

We will apply our usual practical guidance for the administrative treatment of retrospective legislation for taxpayers that anticipate legislative amendments to address these inconsistencies, whether or not there has been a separate formal announcement.

  • Taxpayers can self-assess based on the existing law. Where the amendment to address the inconsistency would increase liabilities, taxpayers will need to amend their returns and pay the increased liability if the law is ultimately changed retrospectively.
  • We will not advise taxpayers to self-assess by anticipating law change to address inconsistencies. However if taxpayers choose to do so, we will not direct our compliance resources to checking whether self-assessments comply with existing law (pre-amendments), in respect of the anticipated law change. Where taxpayers anticipate a change, they should internally document the inconsistency identified between the Australian law and the OECD materials.

Taxpayers should also refer to our related guidance on Lodgment and payment obligations and related interest and penalties, which we will apply in relation to interest and penalties for taxpayers that anticipate legislative amendments to address inconsistencies.

If you identify any inconsistencies between Australian law and the OECD materials, share them with us or Treasury. We may also be able to confirm whether we consider the identified provision is inconsistent with the OECD materials. Contact us to discuss any inconsistencies at Pillar2Project@ato.gov.au.

Engaging with us for advice

Contact us about Pillar Two

You can direct questions about our administration or operation of the Australian global and domestic minimum tax to Pillar2Project@ato.gov.au.

Private ruling applications

Taxpayers can apply for a private ruling regarding the application of a relevant provision of a tax law relating to the global and domestic minimum tax.

The Commissioner of Taxation may decline to provide a ruling in respect of the global or domestic minimum tax in certain circumstances.

The Explanatory MemorandumExternal Link to the primary legislation provides some examples of situations where the Commissioner may determine it is unreasonable to provide a private ruling, including where:

  • the OECD Inclusive Framework has published new Administrative GuidanceExternal Link which Australia is planning on incorporating into domestic law but has not yet done so
  • the OECD Inclusive Framework has identified an issue which requires Administrative Guidance, or is drafting Administrative Guidance on a GloBE or domestic minimum tax issue, and has yet to publish an agreed version of that Administrative Guidance
  • issuing a ruling would require assumptions to be made on how other jurisdictions apply their respective domestic rules implementing the GloBE Rules and domestic minimum tax.

If you are considering applying for a private ruling, before submitting a private ruling or early engagement application contact us at Pillar2Project@ato.gov.au. This will allow us to facilitate preliminary discussions, where we will work with you to identify and clarify the issues and determine the most appropriate form of advice.

OECD guidance materials

OECD guidance materials are intended to promote a consistent and common interpretation of the GloBE RulesExternal Link to provide certainty for MNE groups and to facilitate coordinated outcomes under the rules.

OECD guidance materials released to date include:

More information

For more information, see:

When and how the Pillar Two rules apply

Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

The Australian Pillar Two rules

The Australian global and domestic minimum tax implements the Global Anti-Base Erosion Model RulesExternal Link (GloBE Rules) through primary and subordinate legislation, referred to together as the Minimum Tax law.

The primary legislation includes the:

  • Taxation (Multinational—Global and Domestic Minimum Tax) Act 2024 (Minimum Tax Act)
  • Taxation (Multinational—Global and Domestic Minimum Tax) Imposition Act 2024 (Minimum Tax Imposition Act)
  • Treasury Laws Amendment (Multinational—Global and Domestic Minimum Tax) (Consequential) Act 2024 (Minimum Tax Consequential Act)

The subordinate legislation includes the:

  • Federal Register of Legislation – Taxation (Multinational–Global and Domestic Minimum Tax) Rules 2024 (Australian Minimum Tax Rules)

The Minimum Tax law is to be interpreted in a manner consistent with specific Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidance materials for GloBE. Such materials include the GloBE Model Rules, commentary, and agreed administrative guidance.

When the rules apply

The primary legislation provides that the:

  • Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) and the domestic minimum tax apply to fiscal years starting on or after 1 January 2024.
  • Undertaxed Profits Rule (UTPR) applies to fiscal years starting on or after 1 January 2025.

Who the rules apply to

The Australian global and domestic minimum tax applies to constituent entities that are members of a multinational enterprise group (MNE group) with annual revenue of 750 million Euros or more in the consolidated financial statements of the ultimate parent entity (UPE).

Broadly, constituent entities are members of an MNE group which are not classified as excluded entities under the Minimum Tax law. An MNE group is a group, in most cases determined under accounting consolidation principles, for which there is at least one entity or permanent establishment that is not located in the jurisdiction of the UPE.

  • An entity means any legal person (other than a natural person) or an arrangement that is required to prepare separate financial accounts, such as a partnership or trust.
  • The primary legislation defines the term permanent establishment for the purposes of the Australian global and domestic minimum tax (explained further below).

If the MNE group’s annual revenue, as shown in the UPEs consolidated financial statements, meets or exceeds the revenue threshold in at least 2 of the 4 fiscal years preceding the test year, then the MNE group is in-scope.

The domestic minimum tax broadly applies to Australian constituent entities in MNE groups to which the global minimum tax applies.

Entities excluded from the rules

Certain entities of an MNE group are excluded from the operation of the Australian global and domestic minimum tax (known as GloBE excluded entities).

Some examples of excluded entities include government entities, international organisations, non-profit organisations, certain service entities and pension funds, as well as UPEs which are either an investment fund or a real estate investment fund.

The definition for GloBE excluded entities in the Minimum Tax law is based on the GloBE Rules. A subsidiary of a GloBE excluded entity is not automatically excluded and should be evaluated in its own respect.

Records must be kept that explain their determination as being an excluded entity.

Consequence of being a GloBE excluded entity

Broadly, if an entity in a MNE group is a GloBE excluded entity then it will:

  • not have an obligation to lodge returns for the purposes of the Australian global and domestic minimum tax
  • not be liable to top-up tax, since IIR, UTPR and the domestic minimum tax do not apply.

Where an MNE group is composed entirely of GloBE excluded entities, the group is excluded from the operation of the Australian global and domestic minimum tax completely.

Where an MNE group is not wholly comprised of GloBE excluded entities, some obligations may still apply in respect to excluded entities. For example:

How the rules apply

The Australian global and domestic minimum tax is applied to an entity with an IIR, DMT or UTPR top-up tax amount. Broadly, the top-up tax amount is calculated via the following steps:

  1. Calculate the effective tax rate (ETR) of a jurisdiction: The net income of each constituent entity located in the jurisdiction is determined, followed by the taxes attributable to the net income (subject to reporting simplifications). The ETR is determined by dividing the total taxes by the total net income. The mechanisms for calculating net income and attributable taxes are located in the Australian Minimum Tax Rules and refers to financial accounting data with GloBE specific adjustments.
  2. Calculate the top-up tax for the jurisdiction: MNE groups with an ETR in a jurisdiction below 15% are charged top-up tax relating to the jurisdiction. The tax charged is based on the difference between the 15% minimum rate and the ETR in the jurisdiction. While this is the base case, there are other situations in which top-up tax may arise under the Australian Minimum Tax Rules.
  3. Determine the top-up tax liability for the entity: The jurisdiction’s top-up tax is allocated among the relevant entities, determined by mechanisms located in the Australian Minimum Tax Rules. If the MNE group’s ETR in Australia is below 15%, constituent entities located in Australia will be allocated and liable for a domestic top-up tax amount. If the MNE group’s ETR in a foreign jurisdiction is below 15%, an IIR or UTPR top-up tax amount may be imposed on constituent entities located in Australia, depending on the MNE group’s structure and ordering rules located in the Australian Minimum Tax Rules. In some situations, stateless constituent entities with an ETR below 15% can also be allocated domestic top-up tax amounts.

Further detail can also be found in the OECD’s Pillar Two Model Rules Fact Sheets (PDF, 170KB)This link will download a file.

Top-up tax can also be applied to an MNE group in respect to joint ventures.

Special rules apply when calculating the top-up tax amounts for certain entities, groups, and arrangements. These rules are intended to cater for different tax regimes and holding structures and can classify entities based on various characteristics, including how they might be treated for tax or accounting purposes.

These special rules can apply to entities, groups and arrangements such as a GloBE permanent establishment, flow-through entity, GloBE JV or GloBE JV subsidiary, GloBE investment entity, minority-owned entity and multi-parented group. They may adjust:

  • The jurisdiction the constituent entity is treated as being located in, or whether it is considered stateless.
    • Stateless entities are effectively each treated as being located in a separate fictional jurisdiction for the purposes of calculating top-up tax.
  • Whether the ETR is calculated on a standalone basis separate from other constituent entities.
  • The income and taxes attributed to a certain jurisdiction.
  • Which entity is allocated and liable for the top-up tax.

Multinationals must thoroughly evaluate how their entities are treated in each jurisdiction when determining how the rules apply.

Location

Each constituent entity is treated as being in one jurisdiction only for a fiscal year, including where it changes its location. There are rules in Division 4 of Part 5 of the Minimum Tax Act to determine the location of entities and GloBE permanent establishments.

Where an entity changes its location, it is taken to be located in the jurisdiction in which it was located at the start of the fiscal year.

Most entities will be treated as being located in Australia if considered an Australian resident for tax purposes. If not an Australian resident, the location is generally the place of management or place of creation. Specifically, where an entity that is not a flow-through entity, is an Australian resident under section 6 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, and is not, for the purposes of a tax treaty, deemed a resident solely of a foreign country under the treaty’s tie-breaker rules, it is treated as being located in Australia.

Different rules may apply if the entity is considered a GloBE permanent establishment, fiscally transparent, or is dual located.

Dual located entities

If an entity is considered to be located in more than one jurisdiction (that is, dual located), section 10-60 of the Australian Minimum Tax Rules contains its own tie-breaker rules to determine location.

Where a tax treaty between the relevant jurisdictions contains a residency tie-breaker rule, and that rule deems an entity to be resident only of one of the jurisdictions for the purposes of the treaty, the entity will be located in that jurisdiction.

In other cases, the rules deem location broadly based on the amount of taxes paid or tangible fixed assets and payroll expenditure in each jurisdiction, or otherwise where the entity was created if the entity is the UPE.

Dual located parent entities

An override to the tie-breaker rules may apply if the overseas jurisdiction does not apply the IIR and the relevant entity is a parent entity.

Specifically, if an Australian resident parent entity is considered dual located, and section 10-60 of the Australian Minimum Tax Rules deems it as located in a jurisdiction that has not implemented the IIR, section 10-65 deems the parent entity as being located in Australia where Australia is not restricted from taxing the parent entity under the relevant tax treaty.

GloBE permanent establishments

The application of the rules to permanent establishments depends on whether the arrangement meets the definition of a GloBE permanent establishment. This concept is defined differently to how a permanent establishment is defined in other legislation, such as the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997.

GloBE permanent establishments are treated as constituent entities and subject to top-up tax. Any liabilities and obligations are placed on the main entity. A main entity:

  • is the entity that includes the financial accounting net income or loss of the GloBE permanent establishment in its financial accounts, and
  • must be located in a separate jurisdiction.

Section 19 of the Minimum Tax Act defines a GloBE permanent establishment to include the following simplified scenarios:

  1. Where an entity has a place of business in a jurisdiction, that constitutes a permanent establishment in accordance with an applicable tax treaty, if the income attributable to it is taxed by that jurisdiction in accordance with a provision similar to Article 7 of the OECD Model Tax Convention.
  2. Where there is no tax treaty, but the entity has a place of business in a jurisdiction and the income attributable to that place of business is taxed under the local income tax laws on a net basis similar to how its residents are taxed.
  3. Where a jurisdiction has no corporate income tax system, but the entity has a place of business in the jurisdiction that would have been treated as a permanent establishment under the OECD Model Tax Convention and had the right to tax in accordance with Article 7 of that Convention.
  4. Where scenarios 1–3 do not apply, a place of business through which an entity’s operations are conducted outside the jurisdiction in which the entity is located, if the income attributable to it is exempt from taxation in the entity’s jurisdiction.

Any top-up tax that would otherwise be allocated to a permanent establishment is imposed on the main entity. The allocation of income and taxes between the main entity and permanent establishment depends on the scenario type of the GloBE permanent establishment. For scenarios 1–3, it follows the attribution of income and expenses under the tax treaty, local tax laws where the permanent establishment is located, or the amounts that would have been attributed in accordance with Article 7 under the OECD Model Tax Convention.

The location of the GloBE permanent establishments falling under scenario 1–3 is where the place of business was determined to be. A GloBE permanent establishment falling under scenario 4 is considered stateless.

Flow-through entities

Broadly, under Chapter 10 of the Australian Minimum Tax Rules, an entity is a flow-through entity to the extent that it is fiscally transparent with respect to its income, expenditure, profit or loss in the jurisdiction the entity was created. A constituent entity is treated as fiscally transparent when the income, expenditure, profit or loss of that entity is treated as if it were derived or incurred by the direct owner in proportion to its ownership interest.

The Australian Minimum Tax Rules also have different classifications of an entity depending on whether it is fiscally transparent in its creation jurisdiction, its owner’s jurisdiction or both. Flow-through entities will be a:

  • Tax transparent entity if its owners treat it as fiscally transparent.
  • Reverse hybrid entity if the owners treat it as opaque.

These classifications impact the allocation of income and taxes between the constituent entity and its owners, noting there are special rules that apply to flow-through entities that are UPEs.

A flow-through entity that is a UPE or required to apply a qualified IIR will be treated as located where it was created. A flow-through entity that is neither a UPE nor required to apply a qualified IIR will be considered stateless.

GloBE joint ventures

Accounting joint ventures ordinarily are not considered constituent entities as their accounting results are not consolidated on a line-by-line basis in the consolidated financial statements of the UPE.

However, the Australian global and domestic minimum tax may still apply to certain joint ventures, provided it does not fall within an exclusion. The application of the rules to joint ventures depends on whether the arrangement meets the definition in section 26 of the Minimum Tax Act, referred to here as a GloBE JV. This section requires that:

  1. the entity’s financial results are reported under the equity method in the consolidated financial statements of the UPE of the MNE group for the fiscal year, and
  2. the UPE’s ownership interest percentage in the entity is at least 50%.

Subsidiaries consolidated for accounting purposes by the GloBE JV on a line-by-line basis may also be in scope and are referred to as GloBE JV subsidiaries.

Broadly, top-up tax for these entities is calculated separately from the MNE group, where the GloBE JV and GloBE JV subsidiaries are treated as constituent entities of a separate deemed group, and the GloBE JV as the UPE. In regard to which entity is allocated and liable for top-up tax:

  • IIR and UTPR tax in respect of a GloBE JV or GloBE JV subsidiary is imposed on the MNE group that holds the 50% ownership interest in the GloBE JV.
  • Domestic minimum tax is imposed directly on the GloBE JVs and GloBE JV subsidiaries.

Incorporated and unincorporated entities such as companies and partnerships may be considered GloBE JVs or GloBE JV subsidiaries.

Careful consideration of the treatment of the joint arrangement for accounting purposes and whether the arrangement meets definition of GloBE JV is needed to determine the arrangement’s obligations under Pillar Two. This is due in part because not all entities that are classified as joint ventures per the accounting standards will be GloBE JV or GloBE JV subsidiaries and vice versa.

For completeness, entities that are accounting joint operations (which are treated differently to accounting joint ventures under accounting standards) could still be constituent entities of the MNE group. For a joint operation to be a constituent entity, the portion of assets, income, expenses, and liabilities belonging to the joint operator that is a member of the MNE group must be included on a line-by-line basis in the consolidated financial statements of the UPE. In such cases, the top-up tax calculations in respect of the joint operation will be based on the amounts included in the consolidated financial statements.

Our web guidance in respect of JVs may be further updated in light of external Pillar Two consultation undertaken.

Safe harbours

The Minimum Tax law reflects the safe harbours developed by the OECD. Broadly, there are 4 safe harbours available.

  1. Transitional country-by-country (CBC) reporting safe harbour

The transitional CBC reporting safe harbour allows an MNE group to use CBC reporting and financial accounting data as the basis for the safe harbour calculation. Thereby eliminating the need to undertake detailed GloBE calculations.

This safe harbour applies to fiscal years beginning on or before 31 December 2026 but not including a fiscal year that ends after 30 June 2028. An MNE group may elect to use the safe harbour if it can demonstrate, based on their Qualified CBC Reports and Qualified Financial Statements, that it meets one of the following tests for a jurisdiction:

  • de minimis test
  • simplified effective tax rate test, or
  • routine profits test.

The effect of applying this safe harbour is that the MNE group’s jurisdictional top-up tax for that jurisdiction for the fiscal year is taken to be zero.

  1. Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (QDMTT) safe harbour

An MNE group may elect to apply the permanent QDMTT safe harbour. The permanent QDMTT safe harbour reduces the top-up tax of a jurisdiction to zero. This is for the purpose of applying an IIR or UTPR in Australia in respect of the jurisdiction, where that jurisdiction applies a QDMTT that has QDMTT safe harbour status. This provides a practical compliance solution to avoid needing to carry out both QDMTT and IIR or UTPR calculations in respect of a jurisdiction.

  1. Non-Material Constituent Entity (NMCE) simplified calculations safe harbour

MNE groups may elect to use the simplified calculations safe harbour, which includes a simplified method in determining the GloBE income or loss, GloBE revenue and adjusted covered taxes of a NMCE.

This permanent safe harbour allows MNE groups to use these simplified calculations for NMCEs in determining whether the de minimis test, routine profits test or effective tax rate test has been met for a jurisdiction under the safe harbour.

Broadly, an NMCE is a constituent entity that has not been consolidated in the UPE’s consolidated financial statements solely due to size or materiality.

Where an MNE group meets one of the simplified calculations safe harbour tests, the top-up tax for the jurisdiction is taken to be zero, with some limited exceptions. Simplified calculations are currently only available for NMCEs. Constituent entities other than NMCEs have to apply the usual GloBE computational rules as part of the simplified calculations safe harbour.

  1. Transitional UTPR safe harbour

The transitional UTPR safe harbour allows an MNE to reduce their UTPR top-up tax amount in respect of the UPE jurisdiction (only) to nil during the transitional period, if the UPE jurisdiction has a nominal corporate income tax rate of at least 20%. This safe harbour applies to fiscal years beginning on or before 31 December 2025 and ending before 31 December 2026.

The consolidated commentaryExternal Link provides further information on the safe harbours available and applicable tests where relevant. For details, download the OECD Commentary to the GloBE Rules and refer to Annex A – Safe Harbours: Global Anti-Base Erosion Rules (Pillar Two).

The Australian Minimum Tax Rules also include its own de minimis exclusion in Part 5-5 that can apply for particular jurisdictions.

Additional simplifications

To ensure qualification of Australia’s global and domestic minimum tax, we are unable to provide concessions, simplifications or safe harbours that are inconsistent with the outcomes provided for in the GloBE Model Rules and administrative guidance.

More information

For more information, see:

Lodging, paying and other obligations for Pillar Two

Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

Lodgments

New lodgment requirements

Four new lodgment requirements are introduced as part of the Australian global and domestic minimum tax, consistent with the Global Anti-Base Erosion Model RulesExternal Link (GloBE Rules). These are:

  1. GloBE Information Return (GIR)
  2. Foreign lodgment notification
  3. Australian IIR/UTPR Tax Return (AIUTR)
  4. Australian DMT Tax Return (DMTR).

We are currently developing forms for the foreign lodgment notification, the AIUTR and the DMTR. We anticipate that the foreign notification, AIUTR and DMTR will be combined in one form.

The forms are being developed in consultation with external stakeholders through the Pillar Two Global and Domestic Minimum Tax Working Group and Digital Service Provider Working GroupExternal Link. These products will be available to taxpayers via Online services for business, Online services for agents and some business software providers in advance of the first lodgments, due by 30 June 2026.

GIR and foreign lodgment notification

The GIR is an information return:

  • developed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Inclusive Framework
  • containing data to enable tax administrators to assess a multinational enterprise groups’ (MNE groups) compliance with the GloBE Rules.

Under Subdivision 127-A of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (TAA), the default requirement is for each Australian group entity in an MNE group to lodge a GIR. Broadly, a group entity is an entity or arrangement that, through relationships of ownership or control, have their assets, liabilities, income, expenses and cash flows included in the consolidated financial statements of the Ultimate Parent Entity (UPE).

Consistent with the GloBE Rules, Subdivision 127-A of the TAA provides the ability for group entities to nominate another entity in the MNE group to lodge one single GIR on their behalf. This can comprise of:

  • a designated local entity (DLE) lodging with the ATO or a foreign UPE
  • a designated filing entity (DFE) lodging with a foreign government agency.

When lodging the GIR with a foreign government agency and not locally with the ATO, to effectively fulfill each Australian group entity’s GIR lodgment obligation:

  • The GIR must be lodged on-time in that foreign jurisdiction (if not met, the group will still have Australian filing obligations).
  • Notification must be given to the Commissioner of Taxation by either each Australian group entity itself or the nominated DLE by lodging a foreign lodgment notification form, which we are currently developing.
  • The foreign government agency that the GIR is lodged with must have a Qualifying Competent Authority Agreement (QCAA) with Australia. The GIR will then be exchanged with the ATO as per the QCAA and in line with the dissemination approach agreed by the OECD Inclusive Framework.
    • If the GIR is lodged with a foreign government agency but it’s not exchanged with the ATO within the time period specified in the QCAA, the ATO may by written notice require that the GIR be locally lodged with the ATO.
    • We will provide details on our website of any QCAAs that Australia enters into with foreign jurisdictions.

An Australian group entity is required to give a GIR to the Commissioner even if the amount of Australian IIR/UTPR tax or Australian DMT tax is nil.

There is also still an obligation to lodge the AIUTR and DMTR even if the GIR has been lodged overseas.

AIUTR and DMTR

The AIUTR and DMTR are Australian domestic tax returns. They are currently being developed to enable the triggering of Australia’s domestic assessment and pay provisions. The GIR is an information only return and does not result in a top-up tax assessment.

The AIUTR is for the global minimum tax, while the DMTR is for the domestic minimum tax.

Under Subdivision 127-A of the TAA, each group entity:

  • is required to lodge an AIUTR where they have an Australian IIR/UTPR tax amount (including a nil amount)
  • is required to lodge a DMTR where they have an Australian DMT tax amount (including a nil amount).

Entities have the option to nominate the DLE appointed to lodge the GIR to also file the AIUTR and DMTR on their behalf. An entity’s lodgment obligation will be fulfilled where the DLE lodges by the respective lodgment due date.

Note: Excluded entities don’t have an obligation to lodge the AIUTR or DMTR, nor do they have an obligation to lodge the GIR and foreign lodgment notification form.

Example 1: Australian headquartered group does not nominate a DLE

Paddington MNE group is an Australian headquartered MNE group which is in scope of Pillar Two. The Australian entities have not nominated a DLE and have not lodged the GIR overseas through a DFE.

As a result, each Australian entity is required to lodge the GIR. In addition, each Australian entity is required to lodge the AIUTR and DMTR with the ATO (subject to any applicable exemptions for the AIUTR and DMTR).

Generally, we anticipate that where there is an Australia UPE, the GIR will be lodged in Australia.

End of example

Example 2: Australian headquartered group nominates DLE

Assume the same facts as Example 1 except that Herbert Limited has been appointed to be the DLE for GIR, AIUTR and DMTR purposes in respect to the Paddington MNE group. 

As the DLE, Herbert Limited lodges the GIR, AIUTR and DMTR on behalf of all Australian entities that have a lodgment obligation.  The effect is that each group entity that has a lodgment obligation is taken to have lodged at the time the DLE lodges the returns.

Each group entity that has a lodgment obligation is taken to have satisfied their lodgment obligations on time if Herbert Limited lodges the GIR and the AIUTR and DMTR electronically, in the approved form and by the due date.

End of example

Example 3: Foreign headquartered group

Archie Enterprises is the UPE of a foreign headquartered applicable MNE group with Australian operations.

The MNE group nominates Archie Enterprises to file the GIR with a foreign revenue agency on behalf of the group. Australia has an applicable QCAA with that foreign jurisdiction. All Australian group entities are discharged of their obligation to lodge the GIR with the Commissioner if Archie Enterprises lodges the GIR with their foreign revenue agency by the due date.

However, all Australian entities are still required to lodge the AIUTR and DMTR (subject to any applicable exemptions) and give a completed foreign notification form to the ATO. In this circumstance a nominated DLE can lodge the AIUTR, DMTR and foreign notification form on behalf of the Australian entities.

End of example

Legislative instrument

Entities may be exempt from certain lodgment aspects of the Australian global and domestic minimum tax because the Commissioner makes a legislative instrument (LI) that exempts them.

Specifically, subsections 127-35(5) and 127-45(5) of Schedule 1 of the TAA allow the Commissioner to create a LI specifying circumstances in which a group entity need not lodge an AIUTR and DMTR respectively.

We are currently undertaking work to develop such an LI. For completeness, any relief from lodgment may only be available for the AIUTR or DMTR. The Commissioner cannot exempt entities from lodging the GIR or foreign notification form.

If you have particular views on the types of scenarios, circumstances or classes of entities which should be considered for exemption under an LI, send your suggestions to Pillar2Project@ato.gov.au.

Lodgment due dates

The GIR, foreign notification form, AIUTR and DMTR are required to be lodged

  • 18 months after the end of the first fiscal year, and
  • 15 months after the end of the subsequent fiscal years.

The Commissioner has the ability to extend the lodgment deadline for the AIUTR and DMTR, but not the GIR or the foreign notification form.

Lodgment due dates for the first fiscal year

Year-end date

Lodgment due date

Fiscal years ending before 31 December 2024 (fiscal years less than 12 months)

30 June 2026

31 December 2024

30 June 2026

31 January 2025

31 July 2026

28 February 2025

31 August 2026

31 March 2025

30 September 2026

30 April 2025

31 October 2026

31 May 2025

30 November 2026

30 June 2025

31 December 2026

31 July 2025

31 January 2027

31 August 2025

28 February 2027

30 September 2025

31 March 2027

31 October 2025

30 April 2027

30 November 2025

31 May 2027

Obligations and liabilities for specific entity types

GloBE permanent establishments

For GloBE permanent establishments located in Australia, all lodgment and payment obligations are placed on its main entity. The main entity is required to give the Commissioner a GIR, AIUTR, and DMTR in respect of the GloBE permanent establishment. The GIR and foreign lodgment notification requirements apply to the main entity as if it were located in Australia.

GloBE joint ventures

GloBE joint ventures (JVs) and GloBE JV subsidiaries are not required to separately lodge the GIR or the AIUTR. However, disclosure requirements regarding GloBE JVs and GloBE JV subsidiaries are required in the GIR for applicable MNE groups that hold ownership in GloBE JVs. GloBE JVs and GloBE JV subsidiaries of applicable MNE groups are also required to lodge the Australian DMTR under section 127-55 of the TAA.

Extended application to unincorporated entity types

Targeted rules accommodate different entity types to ensure obligations and liabilities imposed can be administered effectively.

For trusts, partnerships and other unincorporated entities, Subdivision 128-B of the TAA extends the entities to which obligations and liabilities in respect of the Australian global and domestic minimum tax apply.

Extended application under the TAA

Entity type 

Entity subtype 

Entity that obligation, offences and joint and several liability is applied to

Provision

Trusts

n/a

The trustees, regardless of whether the trustee is a member of the applicable MNE group

128-15

GloBE partnerships

Not a GloBE JV or GloBE JV subsidiary

The partners, regardless of whether the partner is a member of the applicable MNE group.

128-20

GloBE partnership

Unincorporated GloBE JV

Each partner of the unincorporated JV that is a group entity of the applicable MNE group.

128-25

GloBE partnership

Unincorporated GloBE JV subsidiary

Each partner that is the GloBE JV, or another GloBE JV subsidiary, or a group entity of the applicable MNE group.

128-25

Not trust or GloBE partnership

Unincorporated GloBE JV

Each group entity of the applicable MNE group that holds a direct ownership interest in the GloBE JV.

128-25

Not trust or GloBE partnership

Unincorporated GloBE JV subsidiary

The GloBE JV and each group entity of the applicable MNE group that holds a direct ownership interest in the GloBE JV.

128-25

Not trust or GloBE partnership

Unincorporated group entities

Each group entity of the applicable MNE group to which a portion of the unincorporated group entity’s assets, income, expenses, cashflows and liabilities belong, or that is a member of the management committee of the unincorporated group entity.

128-25

Note: Both columns under entity type (entity type and entity subtype) must be met for the relevant provision to apply.

Generally, any entity listed above that the extended application applies to can discharge the obligation or liability.

Liability

Top-up tax liabilities

Global and domestic minimum tax is payable by entities that have a top-up tax amount for the fiscal year.

  • The global minimum tax brings the total effective tax in another jurisdiction up to 15% by charging:
    • Australian IIR tax equal to the sum of its IIR top-up tax amounts
    • Australian UTPR tax equal to the sum of its UTPR top-up tax amounts.
  • The domestic minimum tax brings the total effective tax in Australia up to 15% by charging:
    • Australian DMT tax equal to the sum of its domestic top-up tax amounts.

An entity becomes liable for top-up tax on the same day the return that gives rise to the assessment is due, generally 15 months after fiscal year end and 18 months after the first fiscal year end. Shortfall interest charge, general interest charge and penalties can also apply. Where an Australian group entity is a member of a tax consolidated group, the head entity is allocated the top-up tax amounts for the purposes of liabilities for DMT and UTPR tax.

The Multinational – Global and Domestic Minimum Tax Rules 2024 and associated Explanatory Statement (PDF, 1.3MB)This link will download a file detail the mechanisms for allocating and computing top-up tax amounts.

Joint and several liability

All group entities of the MNE group become jointly and severally liable to pay top-up tax, meaning the ATO can collect global or domestic minimum tax amounts or related charges from any group entity in the MNE group. Generally, any group entity can discharge the liability on behalf of all group entities in the group.

Specifically, section 128-5 of the TAA provides that if an amount is payable by a group entity of an applicable MNE group, that group entity and each other group entity of that group is jointly and severally liable to pay that amount. An amount includes top-up tax, general interest charge, shortfall interest charge, and penalties.

Additional joint and several liability rules apply to GloBE JVs of an applicable MNE group. Where GloBE JVs and GloBE JV subsidiaries are liable to pay top-up tax, each of these entities and the group entities of the MNE group that have direct ownership interest in the JV are jointly and severally liable to pay the amount.

There are exceptions to this. Joint and several liability does not apply:

  • to entities that meet the conditions in subsection 820-39(3) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, or
  • where Australian law prohibits the entity from entering into an arrangement under which it becomes subject to such a liability.

Penalties

What administrative penalties can apply

The existing uniform penalty provisions contained in Schedule 1 of the TAA apply, with base penalty amounts similar to those imposed for significant global entities. This means, for example:

  • Penalties for failure to lodge on time, which can apply to entities that do not lodge an approved form by the due date. The base penalty amount is multiplied by 500.
  • Penalties for false and misleading statements or for taking a position that is not reasonably arguable. The base penalty amount is doubled.

In addition, an administrative penalty can apply for failing to keep records about the global and domestic minimum tax.

OECD guidance on penalties

The OECD has released guidance on transitional penalty relief, which outlines that administrators should consider providing a soft landing for MNE groups during a transition period.

This includes recommending administrators consider not applying penalties or sanctions in connection with the filing of the GIR during the transition period where an MNE group has taken ‘reasonable measures’ to ensure the correct application of the GloBE rules. ‘Reasonable measures’ is not defined and should be understood in light of each jurisdiction’s existing rules and practices.

ATO guidance on penalties

We are currently considering consultation feedback received to date about the application of penalties to the global and domestic minimum tax. We will explore the need for updated guidance in future consultation.

Record keeping

The legislation inserts Subdivision 382-C in Schedule 1 in the TAA which provides record keeping requirements on the Australian global and domestic minimum tax.

Broadly, the provision requires an Australian group entity, as well as GloBE JVs and GloBE JV subsidiaries, of an MNE group, to keep records that fully explain whether it has complied with the global and domestic minimum tax legislation. This includes, but is not limited to, all records that explain and show the basis of every disclosure in the GIR, AIUTR and DMTR lodged or exchanged with the Commissioner.

Excluded entities, which may not have an obligation to lodge, are still required to keep records relating to their status as an excluded entity.

Records must be kept in writing in English, or in a format that is readily accessible and convertible to English and must enable the entity’s liability to top-up tax to be readily determined.

Records must be kept until either:

  • the end of 8 years after those records were prepared or obtained
  • 8 years after the completion of the transactions or acts to which those records relate
  • the end of the period of review for an assessment to which those records relate (if extended), whichever is the later.

Australian record keeping requirements for the GIR

As part of the requirement to keep records that fully explain whether you have complied with the global and domestic minimum tax legislation, you are required to keep records that support the disclosures in the GIR. This is notwithstanding that the UPE or DFE of the MNE group may lodge the GIR with a foreign government agency.

The records required to be kept are dependent on the information required to be provided under the dissemination approach, agreed upon by the OECD Inclusive Framework. The dissemination approach sets out which sections of the GIR are to be distributed to each country based on the MNE group’s structure and the requirements of the rule order. More specifically, the UPE country receives the complete GIR, countries with taxing rights receive the detailed calculations for those jurisdictions in which it has taxing rights in relation to, and all countries receive the corporate structure. Based on this, the ATO should receive:

  • general information, such as the group’s corporate structure and summary information
  • detailed top-up tax computations for those jurisdictions in respect of which Australia has taxing rights (including computations in relation to Australia itself)
  • detailed sections relating to safe harbours and exclusions where Australia has taxing rights (including Australia itself)
  • the whole GIR where there is an Australian UPE
  • computations for Australian DMT tax.

Broadly, this means records must be kept for all disclosures in the GIR in relation to overseas jurisdictions where Australia has taxing rights.

Where there is a foreign UPE and Australia does not have taxing rights for an overseas jurisdiction, records must be kept that support that Australian CE has no IIR/UTPR taxing rights as per the agreed rule order. Records must still be kept for all detailed disclosures in the GIR in relation to Australia itself.

Records must also be kept in relation to the MNE group structure regardless of whether Australia has taxing rights over a foreign jurisdiction.

Where there is an Australian UPE, records must be kept for all disclosures in the GIR.

More information

For more information, see:

Call for information – Serious harm – Roper Gulf Region

Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

A 51-year-old male has been arrested in relation to a domestic violence incident that occurred in Borroloola yesterday afternoon.

Around 2pm, the Joint Emergency Services Communication Centre received reports that a female had been struck by a vehicle while walking down a roadway in the community.

Police and clinic staff attended, and the victim was conveyed to the clinic suffering significant injuries to her ankle. She will be transported to Royal Darwin Hospital today for further treatment.

The alleged offender, who is known to the victim, fled the scene prior to police; however, he was arrested this morning at the Borroloola Police Station after handing himself in. He remains in police custody with charges expected to follow.

Police urge anyone with information about the incident to make contact on 131 444. Please quote reference number NTP2500050231. Anonymous reports can be made through Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or via https://crimestoppersnt.com.au/.

If you or someone you know are experiencing difficulties due to domestic violence, support services are available, including, but not limited to, 1800RESPECT (1800737732) or Lifeline 131 114.

UPDATE: Arrest – Serious Assault – Alice Springs

Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

The Northern Territory Police Force have arrested a man in relation to the serious assault that occurred in Alice Springs yesterday afternoon.

Around 12am, detectives attended a residence on Gap Road and arrested the 22-year-old man.

He currently remains in custody.

The victim remains in hospital receiving treatment and a crime scene remains open in on Gregory Terrace, between Todd Street and Hartley Street, with members of the public advised to avoid the area.

Initial enquiries indicate both the offender and victim were known to each other and not Alice Springs residents.

Investigations into the assault and the large altercation remain ongoing.

Serious crash Two Wells

Source: New South Wales – News

Emergency services are at the scene of a serious crash at Two Wells.

Just before 5am, Friday 16 May, police and emergency services were called to Port Wakefield Highway, Two Wells (near the intersection with Port Gawler Road) after reports of a crash between a car and truck. On arrival, the driver of the car was trapped and fire crews quickly worked to remove them from their vehicle. The driver was subsequently airlifted to hospital with life threatening injuries.

The driver of the truck, a 30-year-old-man from Mallala, was uninjured and was taken to hospital for mandatory blood tests.

Major Crash investigators are making their way to the scene.

Port Wakefield Road is closed to all northbound traffic from Port Gawler Road and diversions are in place via Old Port Wakefield Road. Road users are asked to avoid the area.

Anyone who witnessed this crash or has dashcam is asked to contact police. You can anonymously provide information to Crime Stoppers online at https://crimestopperssa.com.au or free call 1800 333 000.

Get ready for business

Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

Our focus

New businesses sometimes make mistakes with their registration, reporting and recordkeeping responsibilities. It’s important new business owners understand their obligations to ensure they’re getting it right from the start.

If your hobby has turned into a profit-making business, you are responsible for your tax, super and registration obligations. Setting up your business correctly from the start will make it easier to meet these obligations.

How to get it right

If you’re planning on starting, or have recently started a new business, we have Ready for business information to help you navigate your obligations.

Here are the top 7 things you need to know when starting a business.

  1. Use digital tools and maintain accurate records to help you manage daily activities and cash flow. Explore our key rules and free resources to strengthen your business practices.
  2. There are some registrations you will need to complete when you start a business, for example registering for an ABN or a business name.
  3. You can claim a tax deduction for most business expenses if they are directly related to earning your income. Remember to keep records and only claim the business portion of mixed-use expenses.
  4. The type of business structure you set up will affect your tax and registration requirements. It’s important to choose the right business structure and understand your obligations.
  5. If you’re an employer, it’s important you know you have extra responsibilities and obligations.
  6. You need to lodge and pay your taxes on time. You can prepay your estimated income tax liability, through pay as you go (PAYG) instalments. You can voluntarily enter PAYG instalments to help you smooth out your cashflow and avoid a large tax bill when you lodge your tax return.
  7. Businesses that maintain accurate records, lodge and pay on time and avoid errors not only steer clear of penalties and general interest charge but also become more resilient when facing challenges.

Example: Barry’s photography hobby takes flight

Barry works an office job Monday to Friday and enjoys taking photos of birds in his spare time. Barry has become well known by members of his local community as a talented photographer.

Over the past 12 months Barry has been approached to photograph local events and demand for his skills is increasing. Barry charges a fee for each event and is now earning money from his photos.

With the growing interest, Barry cuts back on his office work and starts to invest more time into photography. Barry sets up a website, sets up a booking system and starts advertising his services online. He also buys more photography equipment to improve his production quality, so he can earn more from each event.

Barry wants to know if his photography side hustle is a business. He looks at all his activities together and determines he is running a business because he:

  • intends to make a profit to supplement his salary and wage income
  • set up a regular schedule for these activities
  • operates in a business-like way (he has a plan and system for making a profit).

End of example

Know your responsibilities as an employer

Whether you’re hiring your first worker, or you’re an experienced employer, it’s important you understand and meet your employer obligations. This includes:

Keep up to date

Learn more by taking our free self-paced online courses at Essentials to strengthen your small businessExternal Link.

You can also:

  • subscribe to our free Small business newsletter to get updates that might impact your business
  • contact your tax professional to obtain advice specific to your business needs.

Special Commission of Inquiry into Healthcare Funding report

Source: Australian Green Party

​The delivery of the Special Commission of Inquiry into Healthcare Funding report follows almost 70 hearing days and an extensive consultation with health policy experts, patients, consumers, and NSW Health staff involved in the delivery of care at every level.​
The rep​or​t ​has made 41 recommendations across 12 key areas including workforce, education and training, funding and procurement processes. Over the coming months, the NSW Government will carefully consider and develop a response to these findings.
NSW Health Secretary Susan Pearce AM has today thanked every one of the people working in our healthcare system throughout NSW. Their dedication, skill, and commitment to providing the very best patient care have been recognised by the Inquiry throughout the pages of the report.
“The Honourable Justice Beasley acknowledges the strength of the NSW Health system, its openness in its contribution to the Inquiry, and the commitment of our people to improving the public health system for the benefit of the people of NSW,” Ms Pearce said.
While the focus will understandably be on recommendations made and areas for improvement, it is very important to note the comments of the Honourable Justice Beasley, who said:
“…the NSW public health system is a very good one. It comprises doctors, nurses, other clinicians, and workers who are well trained, highly skilled, and dedicated. It is well managed.
“It is not, and is unlikely to be in the near future, entirely mistake or incident free, but any person experiencing an illness or injury who attends a NSW public hospital, facility or service, is very likely to receive treatment and care comparable to the best that is provided in any other developed country.”
On the central issue of healthcare funding, the Honourable Justice Beasley said:
“The money allocated to the NSW public health system by a combination of the NSW and Commonwealth Governments is generally not wasted. Likewise, the local health districts and specialty health networks do not waste their budgetary allocation.”
Ms Pearce said this is not to say that there are not areas for improvement across the public health system.
“We work in a huge and complex public health system and there always has been and always will be room for improvement and innovation, as we strive continuously to enhance patient experiences and outcomes,” she said.
“A crucial part of this ongoing effort is providing the support and creating the conditions to allow our staff to do what they do best – care for patients. I agree with the Honourable Justice Beasley, who said: “The health workforce is NSW Health’s greatest asset. It is the key to a strong and sustainable system into the future.”
“We have longstanding recruitment issues, particularly in regional, rural and remote areas, which are challenging for staff and communities in these areas, as well as in some clinical areas and practice disciplines. This continues to be an area of focus.”
“So, while I am the first to acknowledge that we have significant challenges to address, it is also true that we are addressing all these challenges from a position of strength, with one of the best healthcare systems in the world, staffed by the best workforce in the world.”
“For those who may try to portray the Inquiry, or NSW Health, as something it is not, it should be noted the opening paragraph of the Inquiry Report says:
“This Special Commission of Inquiry should at least be welcomed as a refreshing change to other Commissions conducted in Australia and NSW in recent years. Rather than being an inquiry into the failure of government and its agencies, or into their poor conduct, misconduct or unlawful conduct, it has been an inquiry into how a government service might be improved.”
“More than that, I was heartened to see the Honourable Justice Beasley not only noted NSW Health’s cooperation with the Inquiry, but that this… “cooperation extended to facilitating evidence from witnesses, who on many occasions expressed a form of disagreement or criticism about how things were done, or offered a different viewpoint to that of the NSW Ministry of Health or management.”
“Disagreement and criticism of the way things are done are not unwelcome. Every day in NSW Health, as the Inquiry noted, a genuine exchange of ideas about the ways in which the delivery of healthcare can be improved is critical.”
“This includes supporting staff who raise concerns or make complaints to pursue these matters. I want everyone who works in NSW Health to know they can speak up if they feel they need to. I strongly encourage them to do so constructively. It is vital to ensuring we continue to provide the world class health service the Special Commission of Inquiry has recognised in its report,” Ms Pearce said.