New inclusive scarves bring comfort and pride to breast screening in the ACT

Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

As part of ACT Government’s ‘One Government, One Voice’ program, we are transitioning this website across to our . You can access everything you need through this website while it’s happening.

Released 16/05/2025

People from the LGBTIQA+ community who attend a breast screening appointment in the ACT will receive a rainbow scarf to foster inclusivity and encourage health screenings.

BreastScreen ACT has today launched the Inclusive Rainbow Threads Project ahead of the International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia, Intersexism, and Transphobia.

In collaboration with local artist LaToya Kennedy of Kalari Art, BreastScreen ACT has created vibrant rainbow scarves to encourage people from the LGBTIQA+ community to invest in their health and book in for a breast screen.

Minister for Health Rachel Stephen-Smith emphasised the importance of creating a safe and welcoming environment for all individuals accessing breast screening services in the ACT.

“The Inclusive Rainbow Threads Project is a positive step towards ensuring that breast and chest screenings are accessible and inclusive for everyone, regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation,” Minister Stephen-Smith said.

“The rainbow scarves will be given to individuals who identify as part of the LGBTIQA+ community and attend their breast screening appointment.

“By fostering an environment of support and respect, we aim to encourage regular screenings and promote the health and wellbeing of the LGBTIQA+ community in the ACT.”

The project is supported by BreastScreen ACT’s community of donors and supporters, Luton Properties, the ACT Government LGBTQIA+ and Social Inclusion Strategy Team, and the Canberra Hospital Foundation.

Through Canberra Hospital Foundation’s Pay It Forward initiative, members of the community can contribute by purchasing a scarf where a portion of the funds will pay it forward for someone in the LGBTQIA+ community who attends a screening.

This project builds on the installation of three new mammography machines at ACT community health centres in 2022-23.

Free mammograms are available to eligible Canberrans over the age of 40 years. People aged 50 to 74 years are actively encouraged to have mammograms every two years. It only takes about 20 minutes and no referral is needed.

More information on BreastScreen ACT can be found here: www.canberrahealthservices.act.gov.au/services-and-clinics/services/breastscreen-act.

Quotes attributable to Jodie Kirkness, BreastScreen ACT Quality and Promotions Manager:

“It’s important to make people feel safe and included when they come in for a breast screen. Health care should be accessible, inclusive and supportive for everyone – regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation.

“Research shows that people within this group experience increased discrimination, affecting access to health services and ultimately reducing the benefits of early detection.”

Quotes attributable to LaToya Kennedy of Kalari Art:

“As a proud Indigenous lesbian, I draw inspiration from my ancestors who have walked this land before us and who have managed and maintained this land for tens-of-thousands of years; and from my Indigenous and LGBTQIA+ communities who have taught me to always be strong and proud of who I am and where I come from.

“I also get inspiration from my surroundings, recreating elements of Country and telling stories through symbolic representation.”

“The design shows multiple aspects of traditional elements, such as meeting places, connection pathways, people, symbols that represent the LGBTQIA+ community, footprints, and animal tracks.”

“The design also demonstrates connections and unique relationships that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have with the country, land and the LGBTQIA+ community.”

– Statement ends –

Rachel Stephen-Smith, MLA | Media Releases

«ACT Government Media Releases | «Minister Media Releases

All rise and explore the law and its role in our community this Law Week

Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

As part of ACT Government’s ‘One Government, One Voice’ program, we are transitioning this website across to our . You can access everything you need through this website while it’s happening.

Released 16/05/2025

Canberrans are being called upon to deepen their knowledge of the law as the ACT prepares for its annual Law Week.

Running 16 to 23 May, the week includes a range of events to promote public understanding of the law and its role in society. The theme for 2025 is “exploring law, engaging communities, inspiring change”.

Attorney-General Tara Cheyne said with the government in the process of progressing important reforms, Law Week provides a timely opportunity for the community to learn more about the justice system and how it works.

“The law intersects with almost every aspect of our lives, although many of us don’t think about it until it affects us personally. Law Week is a chance for us to reflect on our unique legal system and acknowledge its important role in our society,” the Attorney-General said.

“Australia’s legal system is one of the key elements that ensure we live in a free and fair society that finely balances individual rights and community safety.

“The ACT Government is currently consulting on important bail reforms which would seek to improve the framework within which judicial officers need to make often complex decisions. To find out more or provide input visit www.yoursayconversations.act.gov.au/bail-reform.

“Another key initiative is the proposed introduction of an indicative sentencing framework, which has the potential to streamline criminal court proceedings, reduce uncertainty for defendants and victims, and allow for faster access to support services.

Law Week events in Canberra are being delivered by the ACT Law Society and its partners. This year they are also raising funds for Roundabout Canberra.

In addition to fundraising events there are also a number of free educational events, including a series of events for high school and college students at the ACT Courts on Friday 23 May, including:

  • Mock jury empanelment: An interactive role play highlighting the jury process and guided by Sheriff’s Officers.
  • Mock bail hearing:  You be the judge, a simulated court hearing delivered in an engaging, educational format.
  • Local justice organisations: An exhibit of organisations that work in the justice sector, with visits from Court Support Canines.
  • Educational court tours: Showing students the ACT Courts’ history and what happens inside a courtroom.

For more information on Law Week events, visit: https://actlawsociety.asn.au/about/law-week.

Quotes attributable to Benjamin Wickham, CEO at ACT Courts and Tribunals:

“This is our third annual open day as part of Law Week.  As well as the mock bail hearing, our Sheriffs will guide students through the jury empanelment process, and we will have a cohort of local justice agencies onsite to give visitors information about the vital services they provide to the community.

“The aim of this open day is to give people a view behind the scenes of the courts. Coming before a judge or a magistrate can be extremely stressful, and the open day gives people an opportunity to see how the justice system works and hopefully take away some of the fear and anxiety that people have about what happens here.”

– Statement ends –

Tara Cheyne, MLA | Media Releases

«ACT Government Media Releases | «Minister Media Releases

Getting taxi service and ride-sourcing provider GST registration and income right

Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

Our focus

If you provide taxi, limousine or ride-sourcing services you must register for goods and services tax (GST) regardless of your turnover. You must collect and pay the GST and income tax on all your rides and all other business income.

We use a range of data sources, including data provided to the ATO by taxi and ride-sourcing platforms, to review the tax file number (TFN), Australian business number (ABN) and GST registration status and other activities of drivers in this industry.

If you’re a driver in this industry and don’t have a TFN, ABN and GST registration, you need to:

  • register now
  • collect, report and pay GST on all your future rides as required under the law
  • report all your income from your rides in your next tax return.

How to get it right

To get it right, you’ll need a TFN, an ABNExternal Link and register for GST. If you’re not using a tax professional for your tax affairs, the best way to securely register, report and pay your GST on all your future rides is to get a myIDExternal Link and register for ATO online services or Online services for business.

If you don’t register for GST, penalties and interest may apply. If you haven’t declared all your income for ride-sourcing in prior years you can amend a previous tax return.

You can also contact your tax professional to obtain advice specific to your business needs.

What we’ll do if you don’t register

We’ll continue to monitor drivers who don’t have a TFN, ABN or GST registration and those who haven’t declared all their assessable income.

If you’re a driver who, after 3 months, still chooses not to register and comply with your GST and income tax obligations, we may:

  • register you for GST
  • back-date your GST registration
  • instruct you to back-pay all the GST on your prior rides, plus interest
  • determine what income tax you need to pay on your taxable income
  • apply financial penalties, which you’ll also need to pay
  • instruct you to complete a number of online courses.

Keep up to date

Learn more by taking our free self-paced online courses at Essentials to strengthen your small businessExternal Link.

You can also:

  • subscribe to our free Small business newsletter to get updates that might impact your business
  • contact your tax professional to obtain advice specific to your business needs.


Crypto exchange $75k out of pocket for missing reporting deadlines

Source: Australian Department of Communications

AUSTRAC issued infringement notices of $75,120 to digital currency exchange provider Cointree Pty Ltd for the alleged failure to submit suspicious matter reports (SMRs) to AUSTRAC on time. 
The action came after Cointree voluntarily disclosed it had not met the reporting timeframes required by the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF Act).
AUSTRAC CEO Brendan Thomas said that failing to submit SMRs on time denies AUSTRAC and its law enforcement partners the opportunity to act on the information in a timely manner.

World-first reusable space debris collector set to revolutionise sector

Source:

16 May 2025

Paladin founder and CEO, Harrison Box, with Triton

University of South Australia based startup Paladin Space has demonstrated the world’s first space payload capable of capturing debris from multiple targets and storing it on satellites for recycling, reducing the cost of space debris removal and making the process more sustainable.

The company showcased their technology, called Triton, at a private demonstration event yesterday at UniSA’s Innovation & Collaboration Centre (ICC).

The next steps will be to demonstrate the technology in orbit, secure pilot customers and perform qualification testing for a space mission. The company is also expecting to share news of an overseas expansion in coming months.

South Australian Treasurer and Minister for Defence and Space Industries Stephen Mullighan says the potential of this innovative product demonstrates the impact South Australian based space startups are having in leading advances in space technology.

“Space start-ups play a critical role in accelerating the growth of the South Australian space industry and strengthening our economic resilience and relevance,” Minister Mullighan said.

“Paladin Space’s innovative technology, which has been developed right here in South Australia, is a perfect example of what’s possible when you foster an environment that nurtures bold ideas. It’s an example of homegrown ingenuity where South Australia is developing innovative ideas aimed at solving global challenges.”

Space debris is a growing issue that poses significant threats to satellites and space missions. The large volume of debris, combined with its high velocity, creates a collision risk with potential to damage satellites and space infrastructure.

A report by Northern Sky Research found that the ‘In-Orbit Servicing Market’ is expected to reach $4.7b by 2031, and roughly half of that market is debris removal and salvaging.

Founder of Paladin Space, Harrison Box says their product will be able to capture multiple pieces of debris in a single mission.

“Triton will make the process of debris removal more sustainable and cost effective while also being able to eject its contents on space targets, preserving the spacecraft in orbit to be reused for other missions,” he says.

Their solution means Triton will eject its contents from the parent satellite at a very specific time so that it’s trajectory will not interfere with anyone else’s satellites. Shortly after ejection, Triton will descend into the Earth’s atmosphere, causing it to burn up completely within a matter of hours.

The team are designing Triton to be compatible with future in-orbit recycling solutions so its contents can be delivered in-orbit as materials for manufacturing.

“We are designing Triton to be able to dock easily with these in-orbit manufacturing stations so that the contents it collects can be recycled into metal rods or sheets for manufacturing satellites,” Mr Box says.

“Not only is this practice sustainable, but incredibly cost effective for satellite manufacturers to ‘skip’ the launch phase of a mission and simply build their assets in space.”

The Triton container is designed to capture many small pieces of debris such as fragments from collisions, however, the product is scalable depending on the mission. If a customer wants a larger volume, they could achieve 600mm (0.6m) cubed, or smaller missions may only require 300mm (0.3m) cubed.

Paladin Space participated in UniSA’s space accelerator program Venture Catalyst Space in 2023, supported by the South Australian Space Industry Centre.

Deputy Director: Business Incubation at the University of South Australia Craig Jones says the novel technology has the potential to make a huge impact on the space debris market.

“Triton is on course to revolutionise the space debris industry and contribute to manufacturing in space, a mind-blowing proposition. We look forward to seeing it in action one day soon,” Jones says.

“From placing second at an ICC global space hackathon, to participating in the Venture Catalyst Space program in 2023, we are incredibly proud to have played a small part in supporting this team to build their enterprise,” he says.

Box says UniSA’s support and infrastructure continue to be instrumental to the success of his business.

L-R, Harrison Box, Stephen Mulligan MP, Peter Stevens and Craig Jones

“The advice I received in the early days helped to shape everything from our pitch deck to the financial accounting for our business, including areas like employability, beach-head markets, problem validation and general customer acquisition practices.

“Having an office space to prototype and run our business from was also a game-changer that allowed Paladin Space to be put on the map, and I am still honoured to be a resident at the Innovation & Collaboration Centre – despite the team growing larger.”

Box says he plans to keep his company headquarters in South Australia as they grow for as long as the government continues to support the space industry.

Venture Catalyst Space, has supported 40 startups that have collectively raised almost $43 million in additional investment and grants, while creating almost 240 space jobs.

About Harrison Box:

  • Box has a Masters in Aerospace Engineering with first-class honours from the University of Glasgow.
  • He spent a year of his study at the University of California where he led a team to design and build a liquid rocket engine test stand in the Mojave desert.
  • During his time at university he worked as a Powertrain Engineer at Nissan and a Avionics Engineer for a flight hardware company before becoming a Systems Engineer for BAE Systems. He spent two years working for multiple fast-jets in various countries, then was a Concept Engineer doing a variety of R&D work on military fast-jets for the remaining year before moving to Australia and becoming a Senior Systems Engineer for a novel radar project.

Media contact: Megan Andrews, Megan.andrews@unisa.edu.au, 0434 819 275

Pillar Two interactions with other provisions

Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

Interaction with other provisions

Australia’s implementation of the Global Anti-Base Erosion Model RulesExternal Link (GloBE Rules) includes consequential amendments to Australia’s income tax law to clarify its interaction with Pillar Two. The amendments are included in the Multinational—Global and Domestic Minimum Tax (Consequential) Act 2024External Link.

In particular, the Consequential Act includes amendments to specific Australian cross-border tax provisions. These include rules concerning foreign income tax offsets, controlled foreign companies, hybrid mismatches and foreign hybrids.

Australia’s foreign income tax offset (FITO) rules do not provide a foreign tax credit for taxes paid under a foreign income inclusion rule (IIR) and foreign undertaxed profits rule (UTPR).

However, to the extent you satisfy the usual eligibility criteria and integrity rules, a FITO may be claimed in respect of foreign domestic minimum top-up tax (DMT) paid on income included in your Australian assessable income.

The amount of the FITO allowed in respect of foreign DMT taxes is subject to an additional safeguard.

New FITO integrity rule for foreign DMT taxes

The amount of DMT tax which an entity is treated as having paid is reduced by:

  • the amount of a refundable tax credit that is refunded to an entity because the credit exceeds income tax liability
  • consideration received for the transfer of a transferable tax credit to which an entity was entitled in respect of a foreign income tax of that jurisdiction
  • cash or cash equivalent amounts recognised as government grants under International Accounting Standard 20 (or a comparable accounting standard applicable under a foreign law)
  • a benefit of a kind specified by the Minister in respect of a specified jurisdiction.

This new integrity rule complements the existing FITO integrity rule. The existing rule reduces the amount of foreign income tax that an entity is considered to have paid:

  • to the extent it is entitled to refunds of the foreign income tax, or
  • by any other benefits worked out by reference to the amount of foreign income tax.

Example: New FITO integrity rule for foreign DMT

Entity A (a constituent entity located in unlisted country Jurisdiction A) is a Controlled Foreign Company (CFC), wholly owned by Aus Co, which is part of the same multinational enterprise group (MNE group).

Jurisdiction A has a corporate tax rate of 10% and has enacted a Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax.

Entity A receives a $6 grant from the government of Jurisdiction A (recognised as a government grant under an applicable accounting standard).

Entity A derived $85 of attributable income, which is wholly attributable to Aus Co. In arriving at the $85 of attributable income, a notional deduction of $10 for corporate income tax and $5 for a foreign DMT tax paid in Jurisdiction A is claimed.

Assuming other relevant conditions in the FITO rules are satisfied, the amount of FITO that could have been available for Aus Co would have been $15 (the combination of $10 CIT and $5 DMT), disregarding the new integrity rule.

However, under the new integrity rule, the FITO is reduced by the government grant ($6), capped at the amount of foreign DMT tax paid ($5).

Therefore, the FITO allowed is $15 – $5 = $10.

End of example

Controlled foreign company rules

The CFC rules work to attribute foreign income earned by a foreign company back to Australia in certain circumstances. The interactions between the CFC rules and Pillar Two are such that:

  • Tax imposed under CFC tax regimes (including Australia) are taken into account when calculating the effective tax rate of a jurisdiction for Pillar Two purposes.
  • Foreign DMT, IIR or UTPR taxes are excluded from the meaning of ‘subject to tax’ for CFCs and transferor trusts located in a listed jurisdiction under section 324 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936). This will also impact whether certain income is considered eligible designated concession income (EDCI) and therefore taxed in Australia.
  • Taxpayers are precluded from notionally deducting foreign IIR tax and foreign UTPR tax in calculating attributable income under section 393 of the ITAA 1936.
  • A notionally allowable deduction may be available for payments of foreign DMT tax.

Australia’s Qualified Domestic Minimum Tax (QDMT) is given priority in its application to Australian income and does not take into account taxes imposed under other CFC tax regimes.

Example: Eligible designated concessional income

Australian Entity A Co is an attributable taxpayer in respect of B Co, which is located in an overseas listed country. The listed country has implemented the IIR, UTPR and DMT.

The listed country applies a QDMT, which includes an item of income from B Co in its Effective Tax Rate (ETR) calculation. This income is otherwise exempt for corporate income tax purposes in the listed country.

In determining whether the item of income has been subject to tax in a listed country, the taxpayer is required to disregard any imposition of GloBE taxes (IIR, UTPR and DMT). The item is still considered as EDCI.

The taxpayer is also entitled to a notional deduction for any foreign DMT paid in respect of the EDCI included in its notional assessable income.

End of example

Hybrid mismatch rules

The operation of Australia’s hybrid mismatch rules broadly continues to operate unaffected by the Australian global and domestic minimum tax.

Foreign DMT, IIR or UTPR and other foreign minimum taxes are disregarded when determining if an amount of income is subject to foreign income tax per the hybrid mismatch rules under section 832-120 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. This ensures that a hybrid mismatch can be identified irrespective of whether a jurisdiction has implemented an IIR, UTPR or DMT.

The disregarding of such taxes also applies in the context of Australia’s targeted integrity rule in Subdivision 832-J. Specifically, a foreign GloBE tax does not impact whether a payment of interest or an amount under a derivative financial arrangement is subject to foreign income tax at a rate of 10% or less. However, the application of foreign IIR, UTPR and DMT taxes may still be a relevant factor under the principal purpose test in determining whether it is reasonable to conclude that an entity entered a scheme with the requisite purpose.

Foreign hybrid rules

Similarly, Australia’s foreign hybrid rules broadly continues to operate unaffected by the Pillar Two regime.

Australia’s foreign hybrid rules ensure that an entity that qualifies as a ‘foreign hybrid’ is treated as a partnership (rather than a company) for Australian tax purposes.

One of the requirements for entities to be treated as foreign hybrids is that no foreign income tax is imposed on the entity itself. References to ‘foreign income tax’ do not include foreign IIR, UTPR and DMT taxes and other foreign minimum taxes, ensuring that the foreign hybrid rules are not impacted by a foreign jurisdiction’s decision to impose such taxes at the level of the foreign hybrid entity.

Example: Foreign hybrid limited partnership

Polar LLP is located in Jurisdiction A. AusCo, located in Australia, is a limited partner of Polar LLP. Under the corporate income tax regime of Jurisdiction A, Polar LLP is treated as fiscally transparent, and the imposition of taxes are on partners of Polar LLP of which AusCo is one.

Assuming all other relevant conditions are met under Australia’s foreign hybrid rules, Polar LLP is treated as a fiscally transparent partnership for Australian tax purposes. One of the requirements to be met is that foreign income tax is imposed on the partners of Polar LLP (including AusCo) and not on Polar LLP itself.

Jurisdiction A implements a IIR, UTPR and DMT, and legislates for these GloBE and DMT related liabilities to be imposed on limited partnerships (such as Polar LLP) instead of on its partners.

AusCo is required to disregard the imposition of those taxes on the partnership and will continue to treat Polar LLP as a foreign hybrid limited partnership under Division 830.

End of example

More information

For more information, see:

Four people charged after North West police seize significant quantity of ice during three separate searches

Source: New South Wales Community and Justice

Four people charged after North West police seize significant quantity of ice during three separate searches

Friday, 16 May 2025 – 10:40 am.

Police have charged four people following three separate searches in the North West this week, with officers seizing more than 3.5 kilograms of ice with a potential to cause significant harm to the Tasmanian community.
The ice seized could have resulted in more than 35,000 individual street deals.
A woman was charged with major trafficking after police seized 3.39 kilograms of methylamphetamine (ice) and a significant quantity of GHB during a routine screening at the Spirit of Tasmania terminal on Wednesday afternoon.
Western Drug and Firearms Unit along with Western CIB and a Tasmania Police Drug detection dog conducted a search of a vehicle at the terminal locating and seizing the ice, along with 5 litres of GHB.
A 27-year-old Bracknell woman has since been charged with trafficking (major offence), importation of a controlled drug, dealing with property suspected to be proceeds of crime and other minor drug offences.
She was detained to appear in the Devonport Magistrates Court yesterday.

In an unrelated incident, two people have also been charged with trafficking after police seized 63 grams of methylamphetamine during an alleged evade earlier this week.
Members of Taskforce Scelus attempted to intercept the vehicle during routine patrols at West Ulverstone on Tuesday afternoon, when the driver allegedly evaded officers.
Road spikes were successfully deployed and the driver and passenger – a 29-year-old West Ulverstone man and 24-year-old Newnham woman – were safely taken into custody.
During a subsequent search of the vehicle, police located and seized 63 grams of methylamphetamine, and more than $3000 in cash believed to be proceeds of crime.
Both the driver and passenger were jointly charged with trafficking and minor drug offences.
The man was also charged with evade police (aggravated circumstances), and multiple driving-related offences including unlicensed driving.
They were both remanded in custody with the male to appear at the Burnie Magistrates Court on Friday 16 May and the female to appear at the Burnie Magistrates Court on 4 June.

A third unrelated search at a Devonport residence yesterday morning resulted in a 51-year-old North West man and member of the Outlaws motorcycle gang being charged with multiple drug-related offences including selling a controlled drug.
During the search police located a quantity of methylamphetamine.
The man will be proceeded against for selling a controlled drug, possession of a controlled drug and use of a controlled drug.
He will appear in Devonport Magistrates Court at a later date.
Detective Inspector Michelle Elmer said the drugs seized during both incidents are highly addictive and have the potential to cause significant harm to the community.
“While the incidents were unrelated, the methylamphetamine seized by our officers in the North West in the past few days could have resulted in more than 35,000 individual street deals,” she said.
Western District Acting Commander Nathan Johnston said this week’s seizures sent a clear message to criminals – you will be targeted.
“Tasmania Police will continue to target offenders who attempt to import illicit substances into Tasmania by conducting both targeted and random screening of persons entering the state by sea and airports,” he said.
“Stopping these drugs before they reach our streets has prevented further harm to the Tasmanian community.”
Anyone with information about illicit substances is urged to contact police on 131 444 or Crime Stoppers anonymously on 1800 333 000 or online at crimestopperstas.com.au

Regional employment at strongest levels in a decade

Source: Jobs and Skills Australia

Regional employment at strongest levels in a decade

Ebony


News and updates
The March 2025 Regional Labour Market Indicator (RLMI) presents the latest results on labour market performance across Australia’s regions.

Global and domestic minimum tax

Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

Pillar Two implementation in Australia

Australia has implemented the Global Anti-Base Erosion Model RulesExternal Link (GloBE Rules) by introducing a global and domestic minimum tax.

The GloBE Rules provide for a coordinated system of taxation intended to ensure multinational enterprise groups (MNE groups) are subject to a global minimum tax rate of 15% in each of the jurisdictions where they operate. They are a key part of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/G20 Two-Pillar SolutionExternal Link, to address the tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy.

On 10 December 2024, primary legislation that implements the framework of the GloBE Rules in Australia received royal assent. The primary legislation also makes consequential amendments. These amendments include provisions necessary for the administration of top-up tax within the existing tax administration framework, consistent with the GloBE Rules.

On 23 December 2024, subordinate legislation containing the detailed computational rules was registered as a legislative instrument. This means the subordinate legislation is now in force, noting it is subject to the standard parliamentary process for legislative instruments, including a disallowance period.

The global and domestic minimum tax comprises of:

  • a global minimum tax which consists of 2 interlocking rules
    • the Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) – acts as the primary rule which broadly allows Australia to apply a top-up tax on multinational parent entities located in Australia if the group’s effective tax rate in another jurisdiction is below 15%
    • the Undertaxed Profits Rule (UTPR) – acts as a backstop rule which allows Australia to apply a top-up tax on constituent entities located in Australia if the group’s effective tax rate in another jurisdiction is below 15% and where the profit is not brought into charge under an IIR
  • a domestic minimum tax, which operates consistently with the GloBE Rules and provides Australia the ability to claim primary rights to impose top-up tax over any low-taxed profits in Australia, in priority over the IIR and UTPR.

The IIR and the domestic minimum tax will apply to fiscal years starting on or after 1 January 2024. The UTPR will apply to fiscal years starting on or after 1 January 2025.

The primary legislation can be found here:

The subordinate legislation can be found here:

ATO guidance

We are currently considering the need for guidance products to support the new measure, along with whether there is a need to update existing guidance. See Advice under development – international issues for more information.

As part of ongoing ATO consultation, we have been seeking feedback on guidance that will most usefully support implementation of the new measure. We will continue to seek feedback as Australia’s implementation of Pillar Two progresses.

You can also contact us if you have any feedback on priority issues for public advice and guidance.

Administering potential amendments

The Australian global and domestic minimum tax must be applied consistently with the GloBE RulesExternal Link for Australia to achieve qualification status. This requires maintaining consistent outcomes set out in specific OECD materials, including future publications and how and in what timeframe a jurisdiction addresses identified inconsistencies with its law. These OECD materials are the GloBE Model Rules, Commentary, and agreed Administrative Guidance.

An inconsistency may arise when Australia has yet to implement agreed Administrative Guidance or there has been a minor drafting oversight in the Australian law compared to OECD materials. Any potential amendment to Australian law to address inconsistencies remains a policy decision as a matter for the government and future governments.

As explained in the Explanatory MemorandumExternal Link, the primary legislation includes a rule making power so that future OECD materials can be incorporated efficiently and in a timely manner. This can apply retrospectively to maintain Australia’s qualification.

While any decision regarding amendments is a matter for government, we expect future amendments to address inconsistencies may generally have retrospective application where relevant to maintain qualification.

We will apply our usual practical guidance for the administrative treatment of retrospective legislation for taxpayers that anticipate legislative amendments to address these inconsistencies, whether or not there has been a separate formal announcement.

  • Taxpayers can self-assess based on the existing law. Where the amendment to address the inconsistency would increase liabilities, taxpayers will need to amend their returns and pay the increased liability if the law is ultimately changed retrospectively.
  • We will not advise taxpayers to self-assess by anticipating law change to address inconsistencies. However if taxpayers choose to do so, we will not direct our compliance resources to checking whether self-assessments comply with existing law (pre-amendments), in respect of the anticipated law change. Where taxpayers anticipate a change, they should internally document the inconsistency identified between the Australian law and the OECD materials.

Taxpayers should also refer to our related guidance on Lodgment and payment obligations and related interest and penalties, which we will apply in relation to interest and penalties for taxpayers that anticipate legislative amendments to address inconsistencies.

If you identify any inconsistencies between Australian law and the OECD materials, share them with us or Treasury. We may also be able to confirm whether we consider the identified provision is inconsistent with the OECD materials. Contact us to discuss any inconsistencies at Pillar2Project@ato.gov.au.

Engaging with us for advice

Contact us about Pillar Two

You can direct questions about our administration or operation of the Australian global and domestic minimum tax to Pillar2Project@ato.gov.au.

Private ruling applications

Taxpayers can apply for a private ruling regarding the application of a relevant provision of a tax law relating to the global and domestic minimum tax.

The Commissioner of Taxation may decline to provide a ruling in respect of the global or domestic minimum tax in certain circumstances.

The Explanatory MemorandumExternal Link to the primary legislation provides some examples of situations where the Commissioner may determine it is unreasonable to provide a private ruling, including where:

  • the OECD Inclusive Framework has published new Administrative GuidanceExternal Link which Australia is planning on incorporating into domestic law but has not yet done so
  • the OECD Inclusive Framework has identified an issue which requires Administrative Guidance, or is drafting Administrative Guidance on a GloBE or domestic minimum tax issue, and has yet to publish an agreed version of that Administrative Guidance
  • issuing a ruling would require assumptions to be made on how other jurisdictions apply their respective domestic rules implementing the GloBE Rules and domestic minimum tax.

If you are considering applying for a private ruling, before submitting a private ruling or early engagement application contact us at Pillar2Project@ato.gov.au. This will allow us to facilitate preliminary discussions, where we will work with you to identify and clarify the issues and determine the most appropriate form of advice.

OECD guidance materials

OECD guidance materials are intended to promote a consistent and common interpretation of the GloBE RulesExternal Link to provide certainty for MNE groups and to facilitate coordinated outcomes under the rules.

OECD guidance materials released to date include:

More information

For more information, see:

When and how the Pillar Two rules apply

Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

The Australian Pillar Two rules

The Australian global and domestic minimum tax implements the Global Anti-Base Erosion Model RulesExternal Link (GloBE Rules) through primary and subordinate legislation, referred to together as the Minimum Tax law.

The primary legislation includes the:

  • Taxation (Multinational—Global and Domestic Minimum Tax) Act 2024 (Minimum Tax Act)
  • Taxation (Multinational—Global and Domestic Minimum Tax) Imposition Act 2024 (Minimum Tax Imposition Act)
  • Treasury Laws Amendment (Multinational—Global and Domestic Minimum Tax) (Consequential) Act 2024 (Minimum Tax Consequential Act)

The subordinate legislation includes the:

  • Federal Register of Legislation – Taxation (Multinational–Global and Domestic Minimum Tax) Rules 2024 (Australian Minimum Tax Rules)

The Minimum Tax law is to be interpreted in a manner consistent with specific Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidance materials for GloBE. Such materials include the GloBE Model Rules, commentary, and agreed administrative guidance.

When the rules apply

The primary legislation provides that the:

  • Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) and the domestic minimum tax apply to fiscal years starting on or after 1 January 2024.
  • Undertaxed Profits Rule (UTPR) applies to fiscal years starting on or after 1 January 2025.

Who the rules apply to

The Australian global and domestic minimum tax applies to constituent entities that are members of a multinational enterprise group (MNE group) with annual revenue of 750 million Euros or more in the consolidated financial statements of the ultimate parent entity (UPE).

Broadly, constituent entities are members of an MNE group which are not classified as excluded entities under the Minimum Tax law. An MNE group is a group, in most cases determined under accounting consolidation principles, for which there is at least one entity or permanent establishment that is not located in the jurisdiction of the UPE.

  • An entity means any legal person (other than a natural person) or an arrangement that is required to prepare separate financial accounts, such as a partnership or trust.
  • The primary legislation defines the term permanent establishment for the purposes of the Australian global and domestic minimum tax (explained further below).

If the MNE group’s annual revenue, as shown in the UPEs consolidated financial statements, meets or exceeds the revenue threshold in at least 2 of the 4 fiscal years preceding the test year, then the MNE group is in-scope.

The domestic minimum tax broadly applies to Australian constituent entities in MNE groups to which the global minimum tax applies.

Entities excluded from the rules

Certain entities of an MNE group are excluded from the operation of the Australian global and domestic minimum tax (known as GloBE excluded entities).

Some examples of excluded entities include government entities, international organisations, non-profit organisations, certain service entities and pension funds, as well as UPEs which are either an investment fund or a real estate investment fund.

The definition for GloBE excluded entities in the Minimum Tax law is based on the GloBE Rules. A subsidiary of a GloBE excluded entity is not automatically excluded and should be evaluated in its own respect.

Records must be kept that explain their determination as being an excluded entity.

Consequence of being a GloBE excluded entity

Broadly, if an entity in a MNE group is a GloBE excluded entity then it will:

  • not have an obligation to lodge returns for the purposes of the Australian global and domestic minimum tax
  • not be liable to top-up tax, since IIR, UTPR and the domestic minimum tax do not apply.

Where an MNE group is composed entirely of GloBE excluded entities, the group is excluded from the operation of the Australian global and domestic minimum tax completely.

Where an MNE group is not wholly comprised of GloBE excluded entities, some obligations may still apply in respect to excluded entities. For example:

How the rules apply

The Australian global and domestic minimum tax is applied to an entity with an IIR, DMT or UTPR top-up tax amount. Broadly, the top-up tax amount is calculated via the following steps:

  1. Calculate the effective tax rate (ETR) of a jurisdiction: The net income of each constituent entity located in the jurisdiction is determined, followed by the taxes attributable to the net income (subject to reporting simplifications). The ETR is determined by dividing the total taxes by the total net income. The mechanisms for calculating net income and attributable taxes are located in the Australian Minimum Tax Rules and refers to financial accounting data with GloBE specific adjustments.
  2. Calculate the top-up tax for the jurisdiction: MNE groups with an ETR in a jurisdiction below 15% are charged top-up tax relating to the jurisdiction. The tax charged is based on the difference between the 15% minimum rate and the ETR in the jurisdiction. While this is the base case, there are other situations in which top-up tax may arise under the Australian Minimum Tax Rules.
  3. Determine the top-up tax liability for the entity: The jurisdiction’s top-up tax is allocated among the relevant entities, determined by mechanisms located in the Australian Minimum Tax Rules. If the MNE group’s ETR in Australia is below 15%, constituent entities located in Australia will be allocated and liable for a domestic top-up tax amount. If the MNE group’s ETR in a foreign jurisdiction is below 15%, an IIR or UTPR top-up tax amount may be imposed on constituent entities located in Australia, depending on the MNE group’s structure and ordering rules located in the Australian Minimum Tax Rules. In some situations, stateless constituent entities with an ETR below 15% can also be allocated domestic top-up tax amounts.

Further detail can also be found in the OECD’s Pillar Two Model Rules Fact Sheets (PDF, 170KB)This link will download a file.

Top-up tax can also be applied to an MNE group in respect to joint ventures.

Special rules apply when calculating the top-up tax amounts for certain entities, groups, and arrangements. These rules are intended to cater for different tax regimes and holding structures and can classify entities based on various characteristics, including how they might be treated for tax or accounting purposes.

These special rules can apply to entities, groups and arrangements such as a GloBE permanent establishment, flow-through entity, GloBE JV or GloBE JV subsidiary, GloBE investment entity, minority-owned entity and multi-parented group. They may adjust:

  • The jurisdiction the constituent entity is treated as being located in, or whether it is considered stateless.
    • Stateless entities are effectively each treated as being located in a separate fictional jurisdiction for the purposes of calculating top-up tax.
  • Whether the ETR is calculated on a standalone basis separate from other constituent entities.
  • The income and taxes attributed to a certain jurisdiction.
  • Which entity is allocated and liable for the top-up tax.

Multinationals must thoroughly evaluate how their entities are treated in each jurisdiction when determining how the rules apply.

Location

Each constituent entity is treated as being in one jurisdiction only for a fiscal year, including where it changes its location. There are rules in Division 4 of Part 5 of the Minimum Tax Act to determine the location of entities and GloBE permanent establishments.

Where an entity changes its location, it is taken to be located in the jurisdiction in which it was located at the start of the fiscal year.

Most entities will be treated as being located in Australia if considered an Australian resident for tax purposes. If not an Australian resident, the location is generally the place of management or place of creation. Specifically, where an entity that is not a flow-through entity, is an Australian resident under section 6 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, and is not, for the purposes of a tax treaty, deemed a resident solely of a foreign country under the treaty’s tie-breaker rules, it is treated as being located in Australia.

Different rules may apply if the entity is considered a GloBE permanent establishment, fiscally transparent, or is dual located.

Dual located entities

If an entity is considered to be located in more than one jurisdiction (that is, dual located), section 10-60 of the Australian Minimum Tax Rules contains its own tie-breaker rules to determine location.

Where a tax treaty between the relevant jurisdictions contains a residency tie-breaker rule, and that rule deems an entity to be resident only of one of the jurisdictions for the purposes of the treaty, the entity will be located in that jurisdiction.

In other cases, the rules deem location broadly based on the amount of taxes paid or tangible fixed assets and payroll expenditure in each jurisdiction, or otherwise where the entity was created if the entity is the UPE.

Dual located parent entities

An override to the tie-breaker rules may apply if the overseas jurisdiction does not apply the IIR and the relevant entity is a parent entity.

Specifically, if an Australian resident parent entity is considered dual located, and section 10-60 of the Australian Minimum Tax Rules deems it as located in a jurisdiction that has not implemented the IIR, section 10-65 deems the parent entity as being located in Australia where Australia is not restricted from taxing the parent entity under the relevant tax treaty.

GloBE permanent establishments

The application of the rules to permanent establishments depends on whether the arrangement meets the definition of a GloBE permanent establishment. This concept is defined differently to how a permanent establishment is defined in other legislation, such as the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997.

GloBE permanent establishments are treated as constituent entities and subject to top-up tax. Any liabilities and obligations are placed on the main entity. A main entity:

  • is the entity that includes the financial accounting net income or loss of the GloBE permanent establishment in its financial accounts, and
  • must be located in a separate jurisdiction.

Section 19 of the Minimum Tax Act defines a GloBE permanent establishment to include the following simplified scenarios:

  1. Where an entity has a place of business in a jurisdiction, that constitutes a permanent establishment in accordance with an applicable tax treaty, if the income attributable to it is taxed by that jurisdiction in accordance with a provision similar to Article 7 of the OECD Model Tax Convention.
  2. Where there is no tax treaty, but the entity has a place of business in a jurisdiction and the income attributable to that place of business is taxed under the local income tax laws on a net basis similar to how its residents are taxed.
  3. Where a jurisdiction has no corporate income tax system, but the entity has a place of business in the jurisdiction that would have been treated as a permanent establishment under the OECD Model Tax Convention and had the right to tax in accordance with Article 7 of that Convention.
  4. Where scenarios 1–3 do not apply, a place of business through which an entity’s operations are conducted outside the jurisdiction in which the entity is located, if the income attributable to it is exempt from taxation in the entity’s jurisdiction.

Any top-up tax that would otherwise be allocated to a permanent establishment is imposed on the main entity. The allocation of income and taxes between the main entity and permanent establishment depends on the scenario type of the GloBE permanent establishment. For scenarios 1–3, it follows the attribution of income and expenses under the tax treaty, local tax laws where the permanent establishment is located, or the amounts that would have been attributed in accordance with Article 7 under the OECD Model Tax Convention.

The location of the GloBE permanent establishments falling under scenario 1–3 is where the place of business was determined to be. A GloBE permanent establishment falling under scenario 4 is considered stateless.

Flow-through entities

Broadly, under Chapter 10 of the Australian Minimum Tax Rules, an entity is a flow-through entity to the extent that it is fiscally transparent with respect to its income, expenditure, profit or loss in the jurisdiction the entity was created. A constituent entity is treated as fiscally transparent when the income, expenditure, profit or loss of that entity is treated as if it were derived or incurred by the direct owner in proportion to its ownership interest.

The Australian Minimum Tax Rules also have different classifications of an entity depending on whether it is fiscally transparent in its creation jurisdiction, its owner’s jurisdiction or both. Flow-through entities will be a:

  • Tax transparent entity if its owners treat it as fiscally transparent.
  • Reverse hybrid entity if the owners treat it as opaque.

These classifications impact the allocation of income and taxes between the constituent entity and its owners, noting there are special rules that apply to flow-through entities that are UPEs.

A flow-through entity that is a UPE or required to apply a qualified IIR will be treated as located where it was created. A flow-through entity that is neither a UPE nor required to apply a qualified IIR will be considered stateless.

GloBE joint ventures

Accounting joint ventures ordinarily are not considered constituent entities as their accounting results are not consolidated on a line-by-line basis in the consolidated financial statements of the UPE.

However, the Australian global and domestic minimum tax may still apply to certain joint ventures, provided it does not fall within an exclusion. The application of the rules to joint ventures depends on whether the arrangement meets the definition in section 26 of the Minimum Tax Act, referred to here as a GloBE JV. This section requires that:

  1. the entity’s financial results are reported under the equity method in the consolidated financial statements of the UPE of the MNE group for the fiscal year, and
  2. the UPE’s ownership interest percentage in the entity is at least 50%.

Subsidiaries consolidated for accounting purposes by the GloBE JV on a line-by-line basis may also be in scope and are referred to as GloBE JV subsidiaries.

Broadly, top-up tax for these entities is calculated separately from the MNE group, where the GloBE JV and GloBE JV subsidiaries are treated as constituent entities of a separate deemed group, and the GloBE JV as the UPE. In regard to which entity is allocated and liable for top-up tax:

  • IIR and UTPR tax in respect of a GloBE JV or GloBE JV subsidiary is imposed on the MNE group that holds the 50% ownership interest in the GloBE JV.
  • Domestic minimum tax is imposed directly on the GloBE JVs and GloBE JV subsidiaries.

Incorporated and unincorporated entities such as companies and partnerships may be considered GloBE JVs or GloBE JV subsidiaries.

Careful consideration of the treatment of the joint arrangement for accounting purposes and whether the arrangement meets definition of GloBE JV is needed to determine the arrangement’s obligations under Pillar Two. This is due in part because not all entities that are classified as joint ventures per the accounting standards will be GloBE JV or GloBE JV subsidiaries and vice versa.

For completeness, entities that are accounting joint operations (which are treated differently to accounting joint ventures under accounting standards) could still be constituent entities of the MNE group. For a joint operation to be a constituent entity, the portion of assets, income, expenses, and liabilities belonging to the joint operator that is a member of the MNE group must be included on a line-by-line basis in the consolidated financial statements of the UPE. In such cases, the top-up tax calculations in respect of the joint operation will be based on the amounts included in the consolidated financial statements.

Our web guidance in respect of JVs may be further updated in light of external Pillar Two consultation undertaken.

Safe harbours

The Minimum Tax law reflects the safe harbours developed by the OECD. Broadly, there are 4 safe harbours available.

  1. Transitional country-by-country (CBC) reporting safe harbour

The transitional CBC reporting safe harbour allows an MNE group to use CBC reporting and financial accounting data as the basis for the safe harbour calculation. Thereby eliminating the need to undertake detailed GloBE calculations.

This safe harbour applies to fiscal years beginning on or before 31 December 2026 but not including a fiscal year that ends after 30 June 2028. An MNE group may elect to use the safe harbour if it can demonstrate, based on their Qualified CBC Reports and Qualified Financial Statements, that it meets one of the following tests for a jurisdiction:

  • de minimis test
  • simplified effective tax rate test, or
  • routine profits test.

The effect of applying this safe harbour is that the MNE group’s jurisdictional top-up tax for that jurisdiction for the fiscal year is taken to be zero.

  1. Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (QDMTT) safe harbour

An MNE group may elect to apply the permanent QDMTT safe harbour. The permanent QDMTT safe harbour reduces the top-up tax of a jurisdiction to zero. This is for the purpose of applying an IIR or UTPR in Australia in respect of the jurisdiction, where that jurisdiction applies a QDMTT that has QDMTT safe harbour status. This provides a practical compliance solution to avoid needing to carry out both QDMTT and IIR or UTPR calculations in respect of a jurisdiction.

  1. Non-Material Constituent Entity (NMCE) simplified calculations safe harbour

MNE groups may elect to use the simplified calculations safe harbour, which includes a simplified method in determining the GloBE income or loss, GloBE revenue and adjusted covered taxes of a NMCE.

This permanent safe harbour allows MNE groups to use these simplified calculations for NMCEs in determining whether the de minimis test, routine profits test or effective tax rate test has been met for a jurisdiction under the safe harbour.

Broadly, an NMCE is a constituent entity that has not been consolidated in the UPE’s consolidated financial statements solely due to size or materiality.

Where an MNE group meets one of the simplified calculations safe harbour tests, the top-up tax for the jurisdiction is taken to be zero, with some limited exceptions. Simplified calculations are currently only available for NMCEs. Constituent entities other than NMCEs have to apply the usual GloBE computational rules as part of the simplified calculations safe harbour.

  1. Transitional UTPR safe harbour

The transitional UTPR safe harbour allows an MNE to reduce their UTPR top-up tax amount in respect of the UPE jurisdiction (only) to nil during the transitional period, if the UPE jurisdiction has a nominal corporate income tax rate of at least 20%. This safe harbour applies to fiscal years beginning on or before 31 December 2025 and ending before 31 December 2026.

The consolidated commentaryExternal Link provides further information on the safe harbours available and applicable tests where relevant. For details, download the OECD Commentary to the GloBE Rules and refer to Annex A – Safe Harbours: Global Anti-Base Erosion Rules (Pillar Two).

The Australian Minimum Tax Rules also include its own de minimis exclusion in Part 5-5 that can apply for particular jurisdictions.

Additional simplifications

To ensure qualification of Australia’s global and domestic minimum tax, we are unable to provide concessions, simplifications or safe harbours that are inconsistent with the outcomes provided for in the GloBE Model Rules and administrative guidance.

More information

For more information, see: