Interview with David Speers, Insiders, ABC

Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

David Speers:

Treasurer, thank you.

Jim Chalmers:

It’s been too long, David.

Speers:

It’s been too long. After a little bit of sleep, how do you reflect on what happened last night?

Chalmers:

It’s still sinking in, David. This was beyond even our most optimistic expectations. It was a history‑making night. It was one for the ages, genuinely. But to pick up on something that Sam said which I think is right, this victory does come as well with healthy helpings of humility as well because we know that there are a lot of challenges to address in our economy and more broadly we know that people are under pressure.

We know the global environment is uncertain, and we know that this second term has been given to us by the Australian people because they want stability in uncertain times, but not because they think we’ve solved every challenge in our economy or in our society more broadly, but because we’re better placed to work towards solving some of those challenges. So there is an element of humility and there’s a lot of gratitude to the Australian people.

Speers:

And I want to just ask you about your approach now to a second term. A second term with a big win and a big majority – bigger than you’ve had in the first term – and this question about how you use this political capital. Just give us a sense of how you are thinking about what you’ll do in this second term.

Chalmers:

Well, I think one of the major differences we have between some of the commentary and how we see our own government is this is an ambitious government. You think about some of the changes we’ve made, income tax cuts, some of the budget repair that we’ve done, the big investments in housing, the energy transformation, and particularly in healthcare, this is an ambitious government and we’re looking forward to implementing the agenda that we took to the election.

I think one thing that tempers some of the discussion I heard from yourself and the counterparts over there is, remember, nobody will control the Senate. It’s not an outcome like we saw under Prime Minister Howard.

Speers:

You’ll still have the Greens there.

Chalmers:

Well, not just them, in the Senate.

Speers:

I think it might, in fact, be just them that you’ll have to rely on, unless you have the Coalition, of course, for legislation.

Chalmers:

The point that I’m making is we have a big agenda, we’re looking forward to implementing it with confidence, with the confidence that comes from a big majority, a substantial majority in the House of Representatives.

Speers:

But I guess, I mean, I hear your point about reforms that you have done in that first term, but I guess what I’m getting at here is that budget challenge in particular. We do have deficits for the next 4 years under your budget plans of about $150 billion in total. It’s a structural deficit. Something needs to happen to fix that. Is that going to be a priority?

Chalmers:

Well, that will obviously require our ongoing attention, but we shouldn’t dismiss or diminish the really quite phenomenal progress that we’ve made in the budget in our first term, a couple of hundred billion dollar turnaround, 2 surpluses – that hasn’t happened for decades – so we’ve made progress.

But the way that Katy Gallagher and I see that challenge is that’s an ongoing challenge, including in a structural sense, where we have made progress in aged care, the NDIS and interest costs but clearly that will warrant ongoing attention.

Speers:

Does the scale of this win give you more confidence to do things that might not be politically popular?

Chalmers:

The way that I see the scale of this win, I thought, again not to dance on the political graves of our opponents, but there was a real kind of darkness at the heart of the Coalition campaign, this kind of backward‑looking pessimism which Australians rejected.

And in rejecting that, I think they embraced the kind of leadership that Anthony Albanese provides which is practical, pragmatic, it’s problem solving, and it’s very forward looking, and that’s the approach that we’ll take.

Speers:

So when we look at what you’re facing over the years ahead, the 3 years ahead, I mentioned the budget challenge, you’ve also got the Donald Trump challenge and the prospects of a global trade war and a lot going on. What are your priorities right now?

Chalmers:

Well, first of all, I think managing this global economic uncertainty. I’ve already had a briefing from the Treasury Secretary this morning at a quarter to 7.

Speers:

Already this morning?

Chalmers:

Yes, this morning, I had a briefing with Secretary Steven Kennedy. I’m grateful to him for providing that briefing of the initial –

Speers:

Do you talk during the campaign or is this the first sort of proper briefing?

Chalmers:

We speak but in not the same way that we would engage outside of caretaker.

Speers:

Now that he knows you’re back in the job for sure.

Chalmers:

So we had a discussion at a quarter to 7 this morning, back to work. Obviously, the immediate focus is on this global economic uncertainty, particularly the US and China part of that and what it means for us. And so I was able to be briefed on that, what’s happening in markets and what it means for the Australian economy. So clearly, that’s the immediate focus and again. I think one of the reasons why we got this big majority last night is because people recognise that if you wanted stability while the global economy was going crazy, then a majority Labor government was the best way to deliver that. So global economic uncertainty but our agenda is really clear.

We have to build more homes now, we’ve got to get this energy transformation right, we’ve got to do more to embrace technology – particularly the AI opportunity. There’s a huge agenda there for us and what our agenda boils down to is obviously weathering and withstanding this global economic uncertainty in the near term, but also making sure that we make the Australian people the primary beneficiaries of all of this churn and change that we’re seeing in the world, and so we’ve got a big agenda there and I’m really looking forward to rolling it out.

Speers:

And just on the briefing you had this morning, is there any noticeable change in the outlook for the global economy?

Chalmers:

I think the spectrum of scenarios is much broader now. We know that the direct impact on us from the tariffs is manageable and relatively modest, but there is a huge downside risk in the global economy. I think what’s happening, particularly between the US and China does cast a dark shadow over the global economy.

And we’re not uniquely impacted by that, but we’re really well placed, we are quite well prepared because of the progress that Australians made over the course of the last 3 years. So we go in that with a sense of, we’re realistic about how this could play out in the world, but we are optimistic about Australia’s place in it.

Speers:

So that is still the number one concern for Australia?

Chalmers:

Certainly, for every country, including Australia. But global economic uncertainty really is the big influence on my thinking and my work on day one of a second term and we need to have the ability – and we will have the ability – to manage that uncertainty at the same time as we roll out our domestic agenda – Future Made in Australia, housing, energy, technology, human capital, competition policy.

Speers:

The great difficulty you face and the government faced in the first term was inflation and all of those interest rate rises. We saw one rate cut earlier this year – are you looking forward to in the second term seeing a few more rate cuts?

Chalmers:

Look, I’m not going to count my chickens on that front. Certainly the market expects there to be a number of interest rate cuts, I don’t make those sorts of predictions. We saw a rate cut in February, and I think that did have an impact on the way people see their prospects.

Consumer confidence has actually started rebounding from the middle of last year, the tax cuts, petrol prices coming down, and then the interest rate cut has slowly rebuilt confidence off a very low base and so if we do see more interest rate cuts over the course of the rest of the year, I think that will be a very helpful way to boost confidence in the economy, particularly consumer sentiment, and also provide some cost‑of‑living relief for people.

Speers:

Nearly every economist says productivity needs to be one of your top priorities as well. Is there more you can do to squeeze more productivity out of the economy?

Chalmers:

Yes, and I’m looking forward to rolling out the changes we announced on a national regime for occupational licensing, the non‑compete clauses change, the competition policy I’m working up with the states, reviving national competition policy – big priority for me as Treasurer – so there is an agenda there.

But also don’t forget, we commissioned from the Productivity Commission 5 big pieces of work on the main drivers – the main pillars of productivity in our economy – we’ll see that in the third quarter of this year. I’m looking forward to receiving that because we’ve got an agenda on productivity, but we can do more, and we will do more.

The best way to think about the difference between our first term and the second term that we won last night, first term was primarily inflation without forgetting productivity, the second term will be primarily productivity without forgetting inflation.

Speers:

That’s interesting, so the priority does shift now to productivity.

Chalmers:

And a much broader sense of it – human capital, competition policy, technology, energy, the care economy – these are where we’re going to find the productivity gains, and not quickly, but over the medium term.

Speers:

Looking at the politics of what happened last night, there were clearly surprises for you and for all of us watching what happened.

Chalmers:

I was trying to keep a lid on it on the panel.

Speers:

You can let loose now. What surprised you the most?

Chalmers:

Petrie I think, as David said. Petrie, if we can cling on there, that would be an extraordinary outcome. But I’m really grateful for what you said before, David, about Queensland and about these really quite remarkable women that Queensland is sending to the national parliament. You think about Madonna Jarrett, Renee Coffey, Kara Cook, Corinne Mulholland in the Senate, we’ve won back that second Senate seat in Queensland, and people will be hearing a lot about Corinne Mulholland. So very, very proud of the contribution that Queensland is making to this second term of an Albanese Labor government.

Speers:

You won’t be so lonely as a Queenslander in the Labor caucus. Just explain to us how it works, if you now have a much stronger Queensland contingent, does that need to be reflected on the front bench?

Chalmers:

Well, I think there’s a stronger contingent in a number of states, and so I always think you can never have too many Queenslanders, that’s why I was so pleased to see Anika Wells join the ranks of the Cabinet not that long ago. We’ve been really long on influence but short on numbers, and now we’re hopefully going to be long on influence and long on numbers.

Speers:

You’d be keen for another Cabinet or Ministry spot, at least from Queensland.

Chalmers:

I’m a Queenslander, and I think that most of the Cabinet should be Queenslanders, that’s just how we’re born and raised, but there’s a lot of good people around the country. Claire Clutterham in Sturt’s amazing.

Speers:

Do you expect there will be a bit of a refresh of the Ministry?

Chalmers:

That remains to be seen and I haven’t been focused on that at all. The Prime Minister will allocate the portfolios when the dust has settled on the count. We know who will be putting their hands up for ministries but that’s not a big part of my job, it’s not a big part of my focus.

Speers:

Now, finally, I just want to ask about the leadership and your future. You did say last night that you absolutely would support Anthony Albanese running again for a third term.

Chalmers:

Yes.

Speers:

What does that mean for your own leadership ambitions?

Chalmers:

Look, I’ve said on probably countless occasions now, if I can sit on the back deck in some period 20 years down the track and think that I was Treasurer in a great Labor government led from go to whoa by Anthony Albanese, I’d be very happy with that.

And I pay tribute to the Prime Minister. I can’t think of a campaign where a Prime Minister has campaigned more effectively than Anthony Albanese over the course of the last 5 weeks. I think he is the biggest explanation for why we turned around the trouble that we were in at the end of 2024 to the position that we won last night. It was an extraordinary campaign, and I think he deserves to be very proud. My expectation and my hope is that he serves a full term and runs again.

Speers:

You’re a student of Labor Prime Ministers past. How does Anthony Albanese now sit in the pantheon?

Chalmers:

He’s a Labor hero, and I think the outcome last night and the fact that his leadership has meant that we are surrounded now by even more terrific colleagues. Ali France in Dickson, unbelievable life story, I think he deserves to be very proud about that. But again, coming back to where we started, there is a humility here because we know that there’s a bunch of stuff that we have to address together, but he has every right to feel very proud, and we’re very proud of him.

I’m personally incredibly proud of him. I rang him during the day yesterday and told him how proud I was of him, and he deserves the lion’s share of the credit for what happened last night.

Speers:

Did you talk last night?

Chalmers:

No, not last night. I was with you all night sitting – I was sitting a metre and a half from you for about 6 hours probably in the end. I’ll probably have a yak with him today, but I rang him during the day before the result was known, and I said his was an extraordinary campaign, he’s got a lot to be proud of and we are certainly proud to be part of his team.

Speers:

Well, Treasurer Jim Chalmers, we do appreciate you backing up this morning. Thank you for joining us.

Chalmers:

Thanks, David.

Kingston man charged with drug trafficking

Source: New South Wales Community and Justice

Kingston man charged with drug trafficking

Monday, 5 May 2025 – 11:40 am.

A 30-year-old Kingston man has been charged with drug trafficking and driving offences after being intercepted by Southern Road Policing officers on Friday night.
Police will allege the man was intercepted in Huonville, when officers located a large quantity of drugs, including MDMA, cannabis, methamphetamine and cocaine in his vehicle.
He was charged with trafficking in a controlled substance and driving whilst disqualified and will appear in court on 23 July.
Our road policing officers operate across the district to reduce serious and fatal crashes, and target those drivers believed to be involved in drug trafficking and other serious offences.

Reduce risk this autumn, register your burn-off online

Source:

Following a year that saw CFA volunteers respond to 936 incidents caused by escaped burn-offs, CFA and Triple Zero Victoria are urging landowners to take extra precautions before lighting up.

With fire restrictions easing across the state, some residents are now taking the opportunity to burn-off grass, stubble, weeds and undergrowth to maintain and prepare their properties.

While encouraged, landowners are reminded to register any planned burn-offs online through the Fire Permits Victoria website at www.firepermits.vic.gov.au/notify and ensure regulations and applicable local laws are followed.

An online registration is the fastest and simplest option and allows 000 Call-takers to prioritise emergency calls. Unregistered burn-offs can not only cause a spike in calls to Triple Zero (000) but also unnecessary callouts for firefighters.

Landowners will be looking to take advantage of the mild autumn conditions and authorities expect a surge in burn-off registrations over the coming weeks.

Triple Zero Victoria Chief Operating Officer Nicole Ashworth encouraged residents to plan ahead and register their burn-off online.

‘When someone calls 000 to report seeing smoke we can confirm if it’s recorded on the burn-off register,” Ms Ashworth said.

‘So, check the weather, plan ahead and notify us online through Fire Permits Victoria’s website – it’s fast, easy and most importantly, allows our call-takers to focus on emergency calls.’

Ms Ashworth said the Yarra Ranges, Cardinia, Greater Geelong and Macedon Ranges council areas saw the highest number of burn-off notifications last year.

Acting CFA Chief Officer Garry Cook said the Fire Permits Victoria website is the preferred platform for community members to register their burns and is just one of many safety steps to take this autumn.

“By registering your burn-off, it allows emergency services to verify the fire is not an emergency, manage fire risk effectively and avoid placing unnecessary strain on local brigades,” Garry said.

“In 2024, over 19,084 volunteer hours were utilised responding to incidents involving escaped burn-offs. Our message is clear – please don’t leave your burn-off unattended.

“We ask landowners have enough people and water on hand to monitor, contain and extinguish their burn-off safely and consistently monitor wind conditions before and after the burning day.”

If you wish to start your burn-off immediately (within 2 hours), you can register calling 1800 668 511, however early online registration is preferred.

For more information about burning off safely, visit www.cfa.vic.gov.au/burnoff.

Before you notify us, ensure you: 

  • Follow regulations or laws by CFA and local council. 
  • Notify your neighbours if the burn will generate fire and smoke. 
  • Check the weather forecast for the day of the activity and a few days afterward.
  • Postpone your activity if high fire risk conditions develop. 
  • Establish a gap in vegetation or fire break of no less than three metres cleared of all flammable material. 
  • Have enough people to monitor, contain and extinguish the burn safely and effectively. Never leave a burn-off unattended. 

Media contacts: CFA Media 1300 232 633  Triple Zero Victoria 1300 783 462

Submitted by CFA media

Review of decision-making criteria in the Bail Act

Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

As part of ACT Government’s ‘One Government, One Voice’ program, we are transitioning this website across to our . You can access everything you need through this website while it’s happening.

Released 05/05/2025

The ACT Government is inviting feedback on potential reforms to the Bail Act 1992.

Today ACT Attorney-General Tara Cheyne MLA will be releasing a discussion paper Review of decision-making criteria in the Bail Act 1992. The discussion paper’s purpose is to assist with the development of legislation to modernise the ACT’s bail laws. The most recent significant reforms to the Bail Act were in 2004.

Minister Cheyne said that bail is one of the most challenging and complex elements of the criminal justice system because it contemplates what limitations are put on someone’s liberty when they have not been convicted of an offence.

“The step we are taking today is not a reflection that our bail laws are flawed, but it is recognition that the legislation is complex, difficult to follow, and will benefit from a review against the latest evidence and observations about how it is operating,” Minister Cheyne said.

Whether bail is granted or not is based on an assessment that a decision-maker has made about the level of risk a person poses, and whether that risk can be managed if the person is in the community.

The Bail Act is the framework for that risk assessment. It provides detail about what must be considered—and what may be considered—in undertaking the risk assessment and in making the decision.

“Ultimately, we want the decision-maker to have regard for all of the relevant information available to them so that their risk assessment is the most informed it can be. The discussion paper is seeking feedback on what information the decision-maker should be taking into account,” Minister Cheyne said.

The discussion paper sets out a potential decision-making framework for a risk assessment to be undertaken through the lenses of the interests of the victim, the interests of the accused, and the interests of community safety and justice integrity.

“The better informed the decision, the greater likelihood there is for persons who present the greatest risk to be managed appropriately, for detention to be limited where it is unnecessary, and for any conditions applied to someone released on bail to be appropriate for the circumstances and level of risk.

“Importantly, we want the broader community to have an understanding of and confidence in what is being taken into account when a decision is made about whether bail is granted, and, where it is granted, how that information is informing any conditions that are placed on a person to manage that risk,” Minister Cheyne said.

Community and stakeholder feedback is sought on the discussion paper until Friday, 13 June. The discussion paper will be available online later today at www.yoursayconversations.act.gov.au/bail-reform.

– Statement ends –

Tara Cheyne, MLA | Media Releases

«ACT Government Media Releases | «Minister Media Releases

Tax time toolkit for investors

Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

Our commitment to you

We are committed to providing you with accurate, consistent and clear information to help you understand your rights and entitlements and meet your obligations.

If you follow our information and it turns out to be incorrect, or it is misleading and you make a mistake as a result, we will take that into account when determining what action, if any, we should take.

Some of the information on this website applies to a specific financial year. This is clearly marked. Make sure you have the information for the right year before making decisions based on that information.

If you feel that our information does not fully cover your circumstances, or you are unsure how it applies to you, contact us or seek professional advice.

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute this material as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).

Taxable NFP organisations

Source: New places to play in Gungahlin

Taxable or exempt organisations

Not all NFP organisations are exempt from income tax. NFPs can be either exempt or taxable.

To be exempt from income tax, an NFP must meet the requirements to self-assess as income tax exempt or be a registered charity that is endorsed by us as income tax exempt.

NFP organisations that seek to advance the common interest of their members and do not benefit the broader community won’t generally meet the requirements for income tax exemption.

Examples of taxable NFPs include:

  • social clubs and fraternal organisations
  • some business and professional associations
  • clubs whose main purpose is providing hospitality services for members
  • political parties.

Some NFP organisations are taxable and may have to lodge income tax returns and pay income tax. If you are a taxable NFP, find out if you can apply the mutuality principle when calculating your taxable income.

To work out if you need to lodge an income tax return or if you should notify us of a ‘non-lodgment advice’ also known as a ‘return not necessary’, check if your organisation is:

Incorporated associations and unincorporated associations are treated as a company for income tax purposes under tax law.

Taxable NFP companies

NFP companies are organisations, incorporated and unincorporated, that operate for its purpose and not for the profit or gain (direct or indirect) of its individual members. Their governing documents must prohibit them from making any distributions to their members, whether in money, property or otherwise.

Taxable NFP companies have special arrangements for lodging tax returns and special rates of income tax. An NFP company with taxable income of:

Income tax rates for the 2023–24 income year

Your reporting requirements and specific rates depend on if your NFP company is a base rate entity.

NFP company that is a base rate entity

Taxable income range

Rate of tax

How to report

$0–$416

Nil

Submit a non-lodgment advice, also known as a return not necessary, to avoid receiving a reminder to lodge letter.

$417–$762

55% for every dollar over $416

Lodge a company tax return.

For help with lodging, see Not-for-profit guide to company tax return.

From $763 and above

25% on the whole amount of your taxable income

Lodge a company tax return.

For help with lodging, see Not-for-profit guide to company tax return.

NFP company that is not a base rate entity

Taxable income range

Rate of tax

How to report

$0–$416

Nil

Submit a non-lodgment advice, also known as a return not necessary, to avoid receiving a reminder to lodge letter.

$417–$915

55% for every dollar over $416

Lodge a company tax return.

For help with lodging, see Not-for-profit guide to company tax return.

$916 and above

30% on the whole amount of taxable income

Lodge a company tax return.

For help with lodging, see Not-for-profit guide to company tax return.

Example 1: income tax payable by NFP company with $900 taxable income

An NFP company has taxable income of $900 in the 2023–24 financial year.

Base rate entity

For an NFP company that is a base rate entity the income tax payable is $225. This is calculated by multiplying the whole $900 of taxable income by 0.25.

Not a base rate entity

For an NFP company that is not a base rate entity the income tax payable is $266.20, which is calculated by taking 2 steps:

  • Step 1 – determine the amount of taxable income above $416, by subtracting $416 from $900. This leaves $484 in taxable income.
  • Step 2 – multiply $484 taxable income by 0.55.

End of example

Example 2: income tax payable by NFP company with $2,000 taxable income

An NFP company has taxable income of $2,000 in the 2023–24 financial year.

Base rate entity

For an NFP company that is a base rate entity, the income tax payable is $500 and is calculated by multiplying the whole $2,000 of taxable income by 0.25.

Non base rate entity

For an NFP company that is not a base rate entity, the income tax payable is $600 and is calculated by multiplying the whole $2,000 of taxable income by 0.30.

End of example

Taxable trusts and partnerships

Taxable trusts and partnerships must lodge a return every year regardless of net income.

For help completing your tax return, see Income tax return for partnerships and trusts.

Other taxable companies

Clubs, societies, and associations whose constituent documents don’t prohibit them from making distributions to their members are treated as other taxable companies.

Incorporated associations and unincorporated associations are treated as a company for income tax purposes under tax law.

Other taxable companies must lodge a tax return each year, regardless of their taxable income. There is no tax-free threshold and they have the same rates of tax as other companies.

For the 2023–24 income year, the rate of tax is:

  • 25% if the company is a base rate entity
  • 30% if the company isn’t a base rate entity.

The taxable income of a club, society or association is calculated in the same way as a company for tax purposes.

Income tax rates for the 2023–24 income year – other taxable companies

Income category

Rate of tax

Base rate entity

25%

Not a base rate entity

30%

For help completing your tax return, see Not-for-profit guide to company tax return.

Mutuality principle

To work out your NFPs taxable income, you must know how amounts received from members are treated. Under the mutuality principle:

  • receipts derived from mutual dealings with members are not assessable income (these are called mutual receipts)
  • expenses incurred to get mutual receipts are not deductible.

Notify of a non-lodgment advice

Who can use a non-lodgment advice

If you are:

How to notify us

As an NFP company, you can give us non-lodgment advice for an income year by either:

To make the request, you must be listed as an authorised contact on ATO records to act on behalf of the organisation. If you need to update your authorised contacts, see Notify us of changes to your not-for-profit.

Phoning us

Speak with a customer service representative using our Lodge and Pay enquiry phone number. Due to privacy reasons, you must be an authorised contact already listed on ATO records. We’ll ask you to confirm your identity and authorisation to access the account.

Using a form

You can download and complete the NFP company non-lodgment adviceExternal Link.

Registered tax agent

A registered tax agent can submit the non-lodgment advice on your behalf using Online services for agents.

Capital gains tax

Capital gains tax (CGT) applies to NFP clubs, societies and associations that are treated as companies for income tax purposes, in the same way as it does for other companies that pay income tax.

Pay as you go instalments

Pay as you go (PAYG) instalments is a system for paying amounts towards the expected tax liability on your business and investment income for the financial year.

Consolidations

Wholly-owned corporate groups may have the option of consolidating for income tax. Consolidation is optional but cannot be reversed. The consolidated group operates as a single entity for income tax purposes, lodging a single tax return and paying a single set of PAYG instalments.

When a group consolidates, it is a ‘one in, all in’ situation, where all of the head company’s eligible wholly-owned subsidiary members become part of the group.

There are specific rules about the types of entities that can be a head company or a subsidiary member of a consolidated group.

140-2025: Services Restored: Monday 05 May 2025 – COLS

Source: New South Wales Government 2

05 May 2025

Who does this notice affect?

All importers and customs brokers who are required to lodge imported cargo documentation to the department for biosecurity assessment. 

Information

Resolved time: 

As of: 09:25 Monday 05 2025 (AEST).

The unplanned service disruption to the Cargo Online Lodgement System (COLS) has been resolved. Clients can now submit lodgements as normal.

Action

No action required.…

‘Silver lining’ effect for many women who separate in midlife

Source:

05 May 2025

A new study challenges a common assumption that Australian women who divorce or separate in midlife are destined for a bleak future.

While finances can be a struggle and personal happiness declines in the short term, it gradually increases within a few years, often exceeding pre-divorce levels.

That’s one finding from a South Australian study that tracked over 1400 women who had divorced or separated, comparing them with a control group of over 2500 women who remained in long-term relationships.

Life satisfaction was tracked over multiple decades, using data from nine waves of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health. The findings have been published in the Journal of Happiness Studies.

Researchers from the University of South Australia (UniSA) and the University of Adelaide said that social support, perceived control, and income satisfaction influenced how well women adjusted after their relationships dissolved.

Lead author, UniSA clinical psychology master’s student Olivia Arcangeli, says that divorce and separation are among the most stressful experiences of adulthood, yet little is known about the impact of later-life relationship dissolution.

“When long-term relationships end during midlife (age 45-50), people still have decades ahead of them, but also less time to re-establish themselves financially and in other ways,” Arcangeli says.

“We found that within three to four years, divorced and separated women returned to their pre-dissolution levels of life satisfaction. This contrasts with a similar study in Germany, which showed that women still had not returned to pre-divorce levels of happiness five to six years after their relationship ended.”

The difference between the two countries may be attributed to more lenient attitudes towards divorce in Australia, where there is far less stigma around divorce than in Germany.

University of Adelaide psychology lecturer, Dr Anastasia Ejova, says the Australian study showed that life satisfaction levels for divorced and separated women matched those of married and partnered women approximately 13.5 years after their relationship ended, and continued growing somewhat faster, slightly exceeding the control group’s life satisfaction in the last few years of measurement.

“This finding can be explained through the lens of post-traumatic growth, whereby individuals who experience major crises may develop increased insight and gratitude regarding their circumstances, which in turn increases their wellbeing,” Dr Ejova says. “We would ideally need to keep following the women for another few years to see whether the faster growth post-separation is sustained.”

Women whose life satisfaction levels fell sharply in the years surrounding the relationship breakup experienced greater long-term happiness afterwards.

The researchers say this could be linked to feelings of relief after dealing with high levels of stress and conflict during their relationship.

Among the control group, happiness levels also rose later in the marriage, consistent with the view that many marital problems were able to be resolved over time.

Women with strong support networks, a sense of control over their lives, and a greater ability to manage on their available income reported higher life satisfaction post separation.

The effects of re-partnering, having children, and education were either non-significant or unexpected.

Unlike previous research on men and women, this study did not find re-partnering to improve life satisfaction levels post-divorce for Australian women. The researchers note it is possible that the benefits of re-partnering are more likely to be seen in men.

In addition, despite an assumption that children present significant emotional and financial challenges for divorcees, the study showed minimal differences in happiness levels post-divorce between women with and without children.

“The findings highlight the need for targeted support services for middle-aged women going through divorce and separation,” Arcangeli says.

“Providing access to counselling, financial advice and social support networks could help women navigate the emotional and economic challenges of separation more effectively, making a big difference to their long-term wellbeing.”

Notes for editors

“Does Time Heal All Wounds? Life Satisfaction Trajectories in Australian Middle-Aged Women Before and After Relationship Dissolution” is published in the Journal of Happiness Studies.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-024-00853-5

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Media contact: Candy Gibson M: +61 434 605 142 E: candy.gibson@unisa.edu.au

Five youths charged by Hobart police after stealing from bottle shop

Source: New South Wales Community and Justice

Five youths charged by Hobart police after stealing from bottle shop

Monday, 5 May 2025 – 9:44 am.

Four youths will appear in the Hobart Youth Justice Court in July, whilst another will be dealt with under the Youth Justice Act 1997 after being charged over stealing from a Hobart bottle shop last night.
A 14-year-old boy was charged with robbery and possess a controlled plant.A 13-year-old boy was charged with robbery and bail offences.A 13-year-old girl was charged with robbery and stealing.A 14-year-old boy was charged with robbery and bail offences.An 11-year-old girl will be dealt with by way of youth diversion under the Youth Justice Act 1997.
Tasmania Police is committed to protecting the community and local businesses, and detecting and preventing anti-social and criminal behaviour to make our public spaces safer for everyone.
Our community deserves to feel safe at home, out in public and in their workplaces.
We will continue to target anti-social and criminal behaviour and where appropriate, necessary and authorised by law, we will be charging those who offend, and putting them before a magistrate.
Anyone who witnesses illegal or anti-social behaviour should report it to police on 131 444, or triple-zero (000) in an emergency.
Information can also be provided to Crime Stoppers at crimestopperstas.com.au. You can stay anonymous.

139-2025: Assistance dogs travelling on cruise vessels within domestic Australian waters

Source: New South Wales Government 2

5 May 2025

Who does this notice affect?

This notice affects assistance animal handlers travelling on cruise ships between Australian ports (not leaving Australian waters), cruise line operators and pet transport agents.

What has changed?

The department currently grants approval for assistance dogs to travel on cruise ships within mainland Australian waters, where the cruise ship is under biosecurity control. The department also requires these assistance dogs to be…