Tanzania

Source:

There’s currently an Mpox outbreak in parts of Africa, including in Tanzania. You’ll need to pass through Mpox screening, including body temperature checks, at all points of entry into Tanzania (see ‘Health’). To travel to Zanzibar, you’ll need inbound travel insurance from the Zanzibar Insurance Corporation. This insurance coverage is limited, so make sure you have other insurance coverage for your travel. Violent crime and terrorism are risks in Tanzania. Be alert to your surroundings and pay close attention to your personal security.

ATO releases new small business benchmarks for 100 industries

Source:

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has released a new set of updated financial benchmarks to help small business owners take the pulse of their business.

Updated annually, the ATO’s benchmarks act as a health check, allowing small business owners to compare their performance including average expenses against other businesses in the same industry.

Quotes attributable to ATO Assistant Commissioner Tony Goding:

‘The benchmarks are a valuable tool for small businesses wanting to stay in good financial health.’

‘Think of our benchmarks like a routine test you take with your GP each year. These can help small businesses diagnose their strengths or spot the early warning signs.’

‘Whether you’re running a pizza shop, pet store or a plumbing business, the benchmarks can help you see how your business stacks up.’

‘If your numbers are outside of the benchmark range compared to others in your industry it may be time for a closer look at your business plan.’

‘Businesses that remain within industry benchmarks are generally less likely to attract the ATO’s attention.’

‘While we never use the benchmarks in isolation, small businesses who fall outside the ATO’s benchmarks are more likely to trigger a closer examination from us to identify if they are making mistakes or deliberately doing the wrong thing.’

The ATO takes non-compliance with tax seriously. Small businesses avoiding their tax obligations are participating in the shadow economy which puts pressure on Australians who are doing the right thing.

Deliberate shadow economy behaviours contribute nearly 60% of the gross small business income tax gap or around $11.2 billion per annum in missing tax. Approximately $8.9 billion of this is associated with under reporting of income and over claiming of deductions.

‘The benchmarks are just one of the tools we use to tackle the shadow economy, along with community tip-offs and data matching.’

‘It’s all about levelling the playing field for honest businesses who are being undercut by their dishonest competitors that aren’t paying the tax they’re supposed to,’ Mr Goding added.

The benchmarks cover 100 industries and over 2 million small businesses around the country. The industries include:

  • Accommodation and food
  • Building and construction trade services
  • Education, training, recreation and support services
  • Health care and personal services
  • Manufacturing
  • Other services
  • Professional, scientific and technical services
  • Retail trade
  • Transport, postal and warehousing.

Small business owners who need help understanding how to improve their business performance can consult a business adviser or registered tax professional. The ATO’s online learning platform Essentials to strengthen your small businessExternal Link can support small business owners to prepare for these conversations, as well as further understand their tax and super obligations.

The benchmarks are accessible on the ATO website and via the ATO app business performance check tool. The key benchmark ratios can also be downloaded from data.gov.au.

Example

The below example shows a small business using the ATO benchmarks to compare its performance to similar businesses in the same industry.

Anna’s pizza shop

Anna operates a pizza shop as a sole trader. Anna wants to know how her business compares to her competitors and how she can improve her business.

Anna searches online for ‘pizza shop benchmarks’ and finds the ATO small business benchmarks. She follows the instructions to download the ATO app. Then, she goes to the business performance check tool.

Anna enters her details into the business performance check tool. She learns the key ratio of cost of sales to turnover for her shop is 44%.

While this is within the range for businesses in her industry with a turnover of $550,300, Anna sees that the range for cost of sales starts at 37%. She realises some of her competitors have lower cost of sales.

Anna looked at other suppliers in the market and got a better deal to reduce her business’s expenses and improve profits.

Notes to journalists

Airports report record aeronautical revenues despite slower growth in passenger numbers

Source: Australian Ministers for Regional Development

Click to enlargeAustralia’s four largest airports, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth and Sydney, each reported their highest ever aeronautical revenues in 2023-24, the ACCC’s latest Airport Monitoring Report shows.

The 24.3 per cent increase in revenues to $2.6 billion occurred despite the four major airports collectively handling fewer passengers than before the pandemic. While domestic and international passengers grew by 13.7 per cent to 114.6 million since 2022-23, passenger numbers remained 4.7 per cent below 2018-19 levels.

“The increase in aeronautical revenues in 2023-24 was driven in large part by the continued recovery in international passenger numbers, which rose by 32.1 per cent at the four airports monitored in our report,” ACCC Commissioner Anna Brakey said.

“Domestic passenger numbers also grew by 6.7 per cent.”

Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne airports also substantially increased their operating profits from aeronautical activities in 2023-24.

“Sydney Airport was once again clearly the most profitable of the four major airports for aeronautical services in 2023-24, both in aggregate and on a per-passenger basis,” Ms Brakey said.

In 2023-24 Sydney Airport recorded an aeronautical operating profit of $570.5 million, which represented a 20.2 per cent return on its aeronautical assets. Sydney Airport advised that both its aeronautical revenues and operating profits in the year were inflated by back-payments received during the 2023-24 financial year from its contractual agreements with airlines. The agreements started on 1 July 2022, but the terms were not agreed to until the 2023-24 financial year.

Brisbane and Melbourne airports reported aeronautical operating profits of $194.7 million and $198.9 million respectively, despite Brisbane Airport catering to far fewer passengers than Melbourne Airport. Both airports reported a 64.1 per cent increase in aeronautical operating profit in 2023-24.

Perth Airport was the only monitored airport to report a fall in aeronautical profits, down by 29.1 per cent to $70.7 million after a significant increase in security and depreciation expenses.

Car parking profits and ‘landside access’ revenues up

Operating profits from car parking grew for all four airports in 2023-24. Brisbane Airport made the largest profits, increasing by 21.1 per cent to $113.4 million. Melbourne Airport made an operating profit of $108.1 million from car parking, followed by Sydney Airport with $95.6 million and Perth Airport with $70.7 million.

All four monitored airports reported operating profit margins above 60 per cent for the second year in a row for their car parking operations.

“Car parking remains a very profitable business for the monitored airports as they report strong demand for parking,” Ms Brakey said.

“Brisbane Airport made an operating profit of 76.6 cents for every dollar of revenue it collected from car parking.”

Sydney Airport was the most expensive for 30 to 60 minute parking and parking for up to 24 hours at the terminal, while Melbourne Airport was the cheapest in both categories.

Long-term parking at a distance from the terminal booked online was most expensive at Perth and Sydney airports and cheapest at Melbourne Airport.

“To save money, motorists are encouraged to book online, if possible, instead of paying the drive-up rates, and should consider using free waiting zones at the airports,” Ms Brakey said.

Revenues from landside transport access services, such as rideshare operators, taxis and buses, grew by 18 per cent to $69.6 million, as vehicle numbers rebounded. All four airports continued to report a growth in rideshare services.

Airports maintain their ‘good’ quality of service rating, despite falling satisfaction from airlines

All four airports maintained an average overall rating of ‘good’ for the quality of service and facilities in 2023-24.

These results were mainly due to high ratings by passengers, continuing consistent trends over the last 10 years.

Ratings by airlines generally fell, and all four airports received only a ‘satisfactory’ result. The most common airline concerns related to aircraft parking facilities, baggage facilities, common user check-in facilities, aerobridges and public amenities.

“The airports all maintained their ‘good’ rating for quality of service, which is based on surveys of passengers and airlines, as well as objective measures such as the number of check-in kiosks per passenger,” Ms Brakey said.

“However, the falling satisfaction from airlines indicates the airports have some work to do.”

Airports have recommenced investment after Covid

After years of relatively little investment due to the pandemic, the airports have invested $985.1 million in aeronautical facilities in 2023-24, a figure set to increase in coming years.

Melbourne airport’s $502.3 million investment accounted for more than half the total investment in aeronautical assets in 2023-24. This included work on runway overlays, taxiways and terminals, such as the replacement of passenger screening equipment as well as works to resurface the north-south runway and replace the lighting system.

Other major projects underway, or recently announced, include new runways for Melbourne and Perth, new terminals for Perth and Brisbane, upgrades to terminals in Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne.

A new airport will also open at Western Sydney in 2026.

“While the four major airports held back on investment during the pandemic period, this is starting to change now there is more certainty around demand for travel,” Ms Brakey said.

“These significant capital works should help increase capacity at our major airports, leading to more flight options for travellers.”

Background

Under direction from the Australian Government, the ACCC monitors the prices, costs and profits of aeronautical and car parking services at Australia’s four largest airports. The ACCC also monitors the quality of these services under the Airports Act.

The possible ratings for airport quality of services are ‘very poor’, ‘poor’, ‘satisfactory’, ‘good’ or ‘excellent’.

The ACCC measures operating profit by earnings before interest, taxes and amortisation (EBITA). Operating profit margin is EBITA as a percentage of revenue.

Aeronautical operations are those that directly relate to providing aviation services, including runways, aprons, aerobridges, departure lounges and baggage handling equipment.

$5 Banknote Theme Celebrates First Nations Connection to Country

Source: Airservices Australia

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) is today announcing the theme for the updated $5 banknote, which will honour the enduring emotional, spiritual, and physical connection of First Nations peoples to Country.

Assistant Governor (Business Services) Michelle McPhee says, ‘The theme encompasses the deep connection First Nations peoples have to the land, the waters and the sky.’

‘This inspiring theme will guide the creation of an artwork that will feature on the redesigned banknote.’

‘The selection of a theme follows an Australia-wide campaign, which led to more than 2,100 theme nominations from the public.’

‘We extend our gratitude to everyone who made a submission.’

Theme for the $5 Banknote

For Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, Country is more than just the land. Country is the land, the waters, and the sky. All are connected. The imagery on the $5 banknote should recognise the enduring connection that First Nations peoples have to Country – as an emotional and spiritual connection, as much as a physical one.

An important context for this connection is the overturning of the concept of terra nullius. This action recognised the existence of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s relationship to Country for thousands of years. The artist is invited to reflect how this decision has shaped a positive future for First Nations peoples.

Key to this theme is the recognition of First Nations communities’ contribution to the restoration and conservation of our environment. Using traditional ecological knowledge First Nations peoples continue to act as custodians to sustain and conserve Country. There is an opportunity for all Australians to learn from Australia’s original stewards on how to nurture and protect our fragile world.

The theme should be represented in a way that recognises the diversity of First Nations peoples, across Australia and the Torres Strait. In acknowledging connection and caring for Country the theme should be inclusive, recognising the nature of Country varies, but it is all connected – the land, waters and sky. The artwork should avoid being tokenistic or stereotypical. The tone for the banknote is of a hopeful future, where First Nation peoples’ connection to Country is celebrated and respected.

Background

Before selecting the theme, the RBA engaged with First Nations organisations across the country to build awareness and encourage the submission of ideas.

The $5 Redesign Imagery Selection Panel, which includes First Nations representatives and representatives from the RBA and Note Printing Australia, selected the theme.

The new design will replace the portrait of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, while the reverse side will continue to feature the Australian Parliament. The new design will reflect the chosen theme and incorporate artwork from a First Nations artist.

Police detect 43 speeding drivers during targeted operation in North

Source: New South Wales Community and Justice

Police detect 43 speeding drivers during targeted operation in North

Monday, 17 March 2025 – 10:47 am.

Police detected 43 speeding drivers during a three-hour highway operation in the North on Friday afternoon.
Members of Northern Road Policing Services targeted speeding during the operation, with one driver caught overtaking an unmarked police vehicle while travelling at 138km/h. 
The driver – who was intercepted by police – was already disqualified from driving.  
He will appear in court at a later date.
Police also intercepted a P1 licence holder – with a 100km/h restriction on their licence -who was travelling at 125km/h. 
The P-plater was fined $353.50 and received three demerit points.
In addition to the 43 speeding drivers, police also intercepted  a driver whose vehicle registration had been expired for nine months.
Acting Sergeant Daniel Midson said the results were disappointing. 
“Road safety is everyone’s responsibility, and we are urging all road users to make safer choices,” he said.
“Tasmania Police is committed to reducing the number of deaths and injuries on our roads, which is why we conduct a range of enforcement activities to make our roads safer for everyone.”
To report dangerous driving, call police on 131 44 or Triple Zero (000) in an emergency.
Footage can also be uploaded to the Tasmania Police evidence portal at https://www.police.tas.gov.au/report/

Man charged with trafficking following vehicle search

Source: New South Wales Community and Justice

Man charged with trafficking following vehicle search

Monday, 17 March 2025 – 10:39 am.

A man has been charged with trafficking after police seized quantities of methamphetamine and MDMA during a vehicle search on Friday evening.
Police from Central North intercepted the vehicle on Mole Creek Road just before 7.30pm, locating and seizing the drugs as well as ammunition and a stolen firearm part.
During a subsequent search of a private residence at Gravelly Beach, members of Central North, Northern Criminal Investigation Division and Launceston Uniform located and seized further quantities of MDMA, further ammunition, and two firearm silencers.
A 26-year-old Gravelly Beach man was arrested and charged with trafficking, firearms offences and minor drug offences.
He will appear in the Launceston Magistrates Court in May.

Charges laid over fatal Glenorchy crash

Source: New South Wales Community and Justice

Charges laid over fatal Glenorchy crash

Monday, 17 March 2025 – 10:29 am.

A 41-year-old woman has been charged in relation to a fatal crash on Main Road, Glenorchy on 5 April 2024.
Following extensive crash investigations, the woman has been charged with causing death by negligent driving and drive without due care and attention.
She will appear in the Hobart Magistrates Court on 2 May 2025.

Export grants supporting Aussie businesses

Source: Australian Attorney General’s Agencies

The Albanese Labor Government is rolling out larger grants for Australian exporters to help them take on the world through the Export Market Development Grants (EMDG) program.

Since the most recent grant round opened in November 2024, the government has delivered over $74 million in grant agreements to over 700 Australian exporters.

The average value of grant agreements executed in the most recent round has risen to $53,000. This is more than double the average grant amount for businesses than was provided under the former coalition government.

When we came to government, it was clear that the declining size of grants significantly reduced the value of the program for our exporters. We have worked to improve the program, so that exporters have greater support and the program is more effective.

Since its inception in 1974, the EMDG program has supported more than 51,000 Australian businesses to market their products and services in over 180 countries. It is administered by the Australian Trade and Investment Commission.

The government is committed to continuously improve businesses’ experience in applying for EMDG, and has appointed Mr Timothy Yeend to conduct the next independent review in accordance with section 106A of the Export Market Development Grants Act 1997.

Mr Yeend is trade expert with over 30 years’ experience working on trade and international business issues. He is a current board member of Tourism Australia and former Associate Secretary at the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. His knowledge of trade and what support export businesses need to compete on the global stage, coupled with his experience in government, will provide a solid foundation for this legislative review.

Consultations will commence in May 2025, with the final report to be provided to government by November 2025, in accordance with legislative timeframes.

Signs of a slowing recruitment market

Source: Jobs and Skills Australia

Signs of a slowing recruitment market

Linda


News and updates
Figures reflect a labour market that is steady but slowing, with fewer new job openings and cautious hiring plans. Read more.

How pumped hydro can be a viable large-scale energy asset for private investors

Source: Allens Insights (legal sector)

Financing the next generation of PHES projects 11 min read

Interest in pumped hydro energy storage (PHES) continues to grow as the need for affordable, long-term, firm and weather-independent dispatchable electricity becomes increasingly critical to Australia’s energy transition. However, its high upfront capital costs and complex planning, procurement, and delivery processes, in contrast with its low operational expenses, is prompting debate over its viability as a mainstream asset class and optimal funding strategies.

PHES assets in Australia are predominantly government-owned, reflecting an era when electricity generation was seen as a public utility and a national asset. The privatisation of many segments within the energy sector raises questions about the future ownership and funding of large-scale PHES assets in today’s market-driven environment.

In this Insight, we explore the challenges and opportunities related to the financing of PHES projects in Australia and outline possible offtake structures to ensure a successful project.

Key takeaways

  • Government corporations have traditionally owned and procured PHES assets in Australia.
  • Significant capital costs, extensive civil engineering, underground works and long lead times have made private sector ownership and access to debt capital markets for PHES challenging.
  • Recent advancements seen in the BESS sector underpinned by the development of innovative funding and offtake structures present a potential pathway by which PHES could follow and become a mainstream asset class.
  • In NSW in particular, there is significant government support for PHES projects, with the LDS LTESA and the new Energy Security Corporation focusing on investing in long-duration storage, and in South Australia the proposed Firm Energy Reliability Mechanism.

Background

Australia has a PHES fleet of approximately 1.6 GW across the Wivenhoe, Tumut 3 and Shoalhaven power stations, with an additional 2.2 GWs of generation expected to come online with the completion of the Snowy 2.0 expansion project. There is also a significant pipeline of privately procured PHES projects in various stages of feasibility and planning.

The scale, capital intensity and inherent complexities of delivering a PHES project has meant that, to date, every project that has come to market in Australia has been funded using some form of government support. The most recent example is the Kidston PHES, which reached financial close in 2021. Whilst a privately owned asset, the project was funded with a combination of equity capital, a government grant and a concessional loan.

A question therefore arises as to whether PHES should continue to seen as public infrastructure necessitating government investment, or market evolution will result in future PHES being funded exclusively by the private sector.

Could a PHES be privately funded?

In our view, yes, though in the short term, the success of PHES will depend on a combination of both private and public sector investment. The private sector faces a unique set of challenges when it comes to the development and funding of PHES projects.

PHES projects have long lead times and are capital-intensive. Upfront development costs are very high, and the construction period typically ranges between three to four years. Up to 80% of asset-life costs can be on upfront capital expenditure, which typically runs into several billions of dollars. As a consequence, PHES is beyond the investment horizons of many private sector investors and the future success of the sector will be contingent on investors gaining access to debt capital markets.

While the recent $3.5 billion debt financing of Snowy 2.0 is an encouraging example of the willingness of mainstream financiers to lend to PHES, it is a government-procured project backed by an AAA-rated counterparty. Privately procured PHES projects with more limited funding sources will be subject to much more stringent credit requirements. Recent examples of cost and time delays on major PHES projects and the trend towards collaborative contracting and pricing models represent potential challenges from a bankability perspective.

Prospective financiers will focus heavily on the developer’s chosen procurement model to ensure that there is firm pricing and transferred risk to limit volatility and exposure. Where there are elements of flexibility or uncapped pricing (for example as seen with approaches to managing geotechnical risk on recent government projects), we are seeing developers seeking to forward-solve these issues by implementing robust risk mitigation measures, including, alternative contracting methods, highly structured delay and performance liquidated damages regimes and intricate risk allocation arrangements.

In addition to enhanced procurement regimes, prospective financiers to PHES projects have, through market soundings, also indicated that highly conversative modelling assumptions and tighter financing terms will be required. As seen with other nascent renewables assets classes during their ascendancy (such as wind, solar and now BESS), developers will likely be required to also build in large contingency packages, contingent undrawn lines, accept front-ended repayment profiles, more stringent cash sweep and upside sharing mechanisms and lower gearing levels.

Access to debt capital markets will also be contingent on investors demonstrating that PHES as an asset class is commercially viable in the context of private ownership. Traditionally, governments have adopted a model of utilising PHES projects as a form of system support (ie where there has been a shortfall of supply during periods of peak demand). In contrast, private sector investors will need to monetise projects and demonstrate positive price differentials between pumping and generation.

Owing to the capital cost of PHES, the initial wave of privately held projects will be financed utilising multi-source funding structures. At least initially, it is expected that multilateral agencies which are spearheading Australia’s push to net zero, such as ARENA, the CEFC and NAIF, will provide concessional/grant funding alongside mainstream commercial debt. The limited pool of civil contractors with PHES experience in Australia, combined with a lack of a domestic OEM market will likely result in developers satisfying key credibility requirements for international export credit agencies to also participate in the financing of Australian PHES projects.

Unlocking private funding for PHES projects

Despite the challenges in financing PHES assets, recent market developments and potential future changes could pave the way for greater private funding of PHES projects.

The sheer scale of PHES projects means there is a limited pool of available investment-grade offtakes, and as a consequence, many pipeline PHES developers are seeking to underpin project economics through government revenue underwriting schemes such as the Long-term Energy Support Agreements (LTESA) and Capacity Investment Scheme Agreements (CISA).

While initially met with scepticism, these agreements are starting to be viewed favourably by financiers, representing a fixed revenue line against which debt sizing can be made. This has been demonstrated by the successful project financings of the Orana BESS project in mid-2024 (the first standalone financing of an LTESA) and recently EnergyAustralia’s Wooreen BESS project (the first standalone financing of a CISA). Both projects also demonstrate the potential upside these products offer to developers, with the revenue underwrite providing scope to trade all or part of a project’s capacity in the merchant market.

A potential challenge however is whether or not the LTESA and CIS programs are in fact ‘fit-for-purpose’ in the context of PHES, owing to their capital intensity and the quantum that these government support agreements will have to underwrite over the long term. There is a view by some market participants that a more traditional model, whereby the government acquires an equity interest in projects, would be better suited to PHES and would go some way towards solving a number of the key bankability concerns pipeline developers are currently grappling with.

The NSW Government has sought to address this issue through the Long Duration Storage (LDS) LTESA, which provides a tailored agreement for LDS projects (including PHES) to account for the fundamental differences in their operational and market context.

Key features of the LDS LTESA that benefit PHES projects are:

  • an underwriting mechanism that grants the operator a series of two-year options to access a variable annuity payment in the form of a top-up to net operational revenue – rather than short-term swaps, which are granted under the generation LTESA;
  • a minimum availability threshold of 97% rather than a minimum generation guarantee; and
  • a contract term of up to 40 years for PHES projects, compared to 20 years for a generation LTESA and 10 years for firming LTESAs.

The ACEN Phoenix PHES project was recently awarded an LDS LTESA, marking the first time a PHES project has been awarded an LTESA. AEMO Services has indicated that the next LDS tender round will open in the second quarter of 2025 and is encouraging projects with short lead times to participate in order to meet the 2030 minimum objective. This directive does not rule out PHES projects, with many of the PHES currently under development in Australia having expected completion dates of 2030 or earlier. PHES projects with longer lead times are encouraged to participate in future LDS tenders to help meet the 2034 minimum objective.

While there is no active mechanism in any other jurisdiction, the South Australian Government has announced its proposed Firm Energy Reliability Mechanism (FERM), which is similar to the NSW LDS LTESA tenders and Federal Capacity Investment Scheme, providing a revenue underwrite for long-duration capacity projects. All existing and new generators in South Australia with long-duration firm capacity >30MW (excluding coal) and that can dispatch for a period of at least eight continuous hours must participate in the FERM process, but are not required to bid for financial contracts. The South Australian Government is considering responses to the FERM and is expected to release an update in 2025. With NSW as the frontrunner in supporting LDS projects and SA proposing some support, other jurisdictions may consider similar regimes based on their progress.

In June 2024, the NSW Energy Security Corporation (ESC) was established to accelerate the state’s renewable energy transition. In February 2025, the government announced the first Investment Mandate for the ESC. The Investment Mandate sets out how the ESC will invest in renewable energy projects where private sector investments alone are insufficient. The ESC has been allocated $1 billion and will co-invest with private investors on PHES, as well as large-scale batteries, community batteries and virtual power plants.

The Investment Mandate did not provide a breakdown of how the $1 billion would be allocated amongst these projects. However, with a clear mandate to invest in PHES projects, there is hope that the ESC may be able to help address some of the challenges faced by private investment as set out above.

PHES is often referred to as a ‘water battery’. It is therefore unsurprising that revenue models which have underpinned the recent meteoric rise of the BESS market are similarly being adopted by PHES developers who are currently in the planning phase.

In particular, the rise of virtual offtake arrangements (ie where the offtaker makes virtual nominations that are effectively separate from the physical operation of the asset). These structures (and the significant capacity size of PHES) allow a developer to retain day-to-day control over the underlying PHES asset, split capacity across multiple offtakers, provide potential for greater equity upside (although also give rise to greater risk on the downside), and importantly can be treated off-balance sheet from an accounting perspective.

We are anticipating a further evolution of the virtual offtake market, particularly if storage projects can secure an underlying LTESA or CISA, which can give them a base level of security to trade the remaining capacity. Revenue sharing, caps and firmed supply (or a mixture of a number of structures) could be possible, and we expect the PHES market to take inspiration from the BESS market.

Actions you can take now

If you are considering entering the PHES space and exploring funding options, it is important to:

  • engage with financiers (both private and government, and concessional providers) early;
  • engage external counsel early and seek guidance on key bankability issues throughout the planning and feasibility phases;
  • develop your revenue stack during the planning phase (in consultation with financiers) and take into consideration the quickly evolving offtake market in the BESS sector;
  • for those projects in NSW:
    • prepare for the next LDS LTESA round which is slated to be undertaken before the second half of this year; 
    • engage with the ESC to explore how it will invest its $1 billion in the context of a PHES project; and
  • for those projects in South Australia, engage with the South Australian government and monitor for updates on the FERM process.